Even if you don't believe that humans are responsible for

>>136126313
Go fuck a tree, hippy.

File: IMG_2058.jpg (61KB, 620x465px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 620x465px

>>136126458
Not an argument

Those two things are separated issues anon
If you are a real conservative, yes you want to preserve the nature
But neocons are just capitalists, not conservative.
And the global warming is an exagerated scam to put global co2 taxes to fund the UN
If it's real why doesn't any country start building sea walls like the dutch?
Seems to me all the money the climate change scientiest are receiving is just so they can make even more documentaries about climate change and not coming up with actual solutions.
Scientific media telling people in the 80's that we would all be living under the sea in 2010 didn't help either

>>136126313

Releasing CO2 into the atmosphere is not "pollution" except in the context of global warming.

>>136126313
Pollution is veritably detrimental to us and our environment. Anthropogenic climate change hasn't been successfully proven or correlated to any climate model. It's not even been proven global warming is especially dangerous to our environment. Imagine if the Sahara encroaches a bit further south and Greenland becomes tillable. Big deal, but is it a real big deal?

>>136127139
>Those two things are separated issues anon

No they aren't CO2 it's pollution.

Plain and simple.

>>136126313
Fuck the ecosystem and fuck the government, but first and foremost fuck cucks like you. If you had and real concerns at all about the environment you would have offed yourself long ago.

>>136126313
Companies are not allowed to pollute the ecosystem.

>>136126313
Why should you be allowed to pollute for free? You think those turds clean themselves up? Never mind your selfish use of oxygen (that you've taken from a PoC btw) and reckless release of CO2 and CH4 which are toxic greenhouse gases that contribute to global warming.
Heh. Bet you don't even pay your oxygen taxes.