If you aren't a radical centrist you are most likely

>>136091686
If you call people brainlets you are most likely a joo

>>136091742
t. brainlet who doesn't understand centrism
have fun sponsoring expensive wars because that's the right wing thing to do.

>radical centrist
>democrat
Your idea of a compromise between the two sides of the political spectrum is "open borders, gun grabbing, and cultural relativism."
Please suck a dick. There was literally "one" centrist in the election, and neither of the main parties liked him.

>>136092450
>taking flags seriously

File: Adolf_Hitler.jpg (136KB, 1165x1549px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 1165x1549px

>>136091686
I am a Radical Centrist. It's called National Socialism. It combines right-wing and left-wing elements in such a way as to create a society custom-tailored to the people of the nation.

The question is, why are you calling yourself a Radical Centrist? I don't think you are one. I think I'm one. why don't you explain to me what exactly it is you believe, and then I will explain that you aren't a centrist at all, you are 99% certain to be a neoliberal retard whose idea of "policy" is actually a collection of pre-fabricated talking points which you chose not out of a desire to be effective, but because you simply fear resistance and criticism and so adopt positions which are popular and as such are difficult to assault without appearing extreme.

Because that is what you are, I am certain of it. You lack the intellectual integrity to actually assemble a real political philosophy and so you uniformly choose the path of least resistance every single time. Name me one thing which you believe which most people are not at least ambivalent towards. Name me one thing which you believe that most people do not understand adequately to have a real opinion on,and as such are wrong about.

Tell me. Prove that you are actually a centrist, because I, by definition, actually am, whereas you, by definition, are almost certainly not. And for fun--go look up what the word "Radical" actually means, because I guarantee you that you do not.

>>136092610
The point still stands. Anyone who has a grand fucking problem with Trump beyond the white house chaos and the fact that he capitulates to certain systems that he simply doesn't have to (the whole fed circuit shit show was a Jacksonian moment waiting to happen) isn't as much a "centrist" as they are a gibbering partisan who realizes how much worse at disguising bullshit the rest of their party is.
>Saves a supreme court that's stacked against the second from years of abuse.
>Cuts into illegal migration and outsourcing.
>Cuts spending on stupid shit like SRS in the military. Hopefully "religious exceptions" for Sikhs and the like will be removed as well.
>Causes the DNC to implode, hopefully leading to a renaissance in the form of a new left that can focus on workers' rights and doesn't pull itself into pretzels over made-up bullshit.
>Stands in opposition to bullshit special interests that are interested in dragging us into another stupid war.

But yeah, you're a centrist, because you see one person with a blue hat, one person with a red, and go "HAHAH, WEAR A PURPLE HAT, MORONS!"

Fuck off and read a book instead of pretending you know shit about any of this.