http://imgur.com/5Le7qug
http://imgur.com/feRGo3S
http://imgur.com/F37tIcm
http://imgur.com/URK0muf
http://imgur.com/8ngVS8z
http://imgur.com/Mv1NihK
http://imgur.com/kahK8Ug
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/08/03/propaganda-reports-of-hr-mcmasters-letter-to-susan-rice-presented-to-deceive/amp/
> The signals are often subtle but also follow a familiar pattern. The latest round of anti-McMasters stories are transparently part of that effort.
> The long knives are out after National Security Advisor McMasters, and those knives are transparently connected to a very familiar and historic ideological world-view.
> Example: Circa News writer, Sara Carter, today pushes a story about HR McMasters giving Susan Rice access -via a letter of approval- to ongoing classified intelligence; at least that’s the way the narrative engineers who pick up the ball from Carter are selling it.
> Except it’s not true; that angle/narrative is entirely false.
> In the letter (included below) National Security Advisor HR McMasters simply gave former NSA Susan Rice permission to continue accessing historic classified intelligence that she created and received while Mrs. Rice was President Obama’s NSA lead.
> McMasters is NOT giving Rice ongoing access to new intelligence information, or current classified intelligence information. His letter was simply authorizing her to reference and have access to the historic intel work product she previously, personally and specifically was involved in.
> Obviously Rice’s prior NSC work-product remains classified and as such cannot leave the control of the National Security Council. Classified NSC information can be as innocuous as emails or memos to colleagues on the NSC during her tenure as NatSec Advisor, or it could be her schedule and calendar of events. The McMasters letter simply allows Rice to have continued access to prior content she was in charge of. Nothing more.
https://imgur.com/jnzs5rN
> The controversial stories being shouted from the rooftops are a nothingburger. However, they do serve to provide examples of how the motives of those pushing them should be reviewed with a great deal of skepticism and cynicism.
> Regardless of your position on him, there’s no doubt specific knives, with specific motives, are out to get rid of McMasters. –Breitbart Has Another Hit HERE– Pay attention to what organizations are pushing this agenda; and more importantly, if you look at the specific authorship behind the writing, you’ll discover the uni-directional point of focus.
> There’s always an ongoing battle for priority in policy. Pay attention to who and how these priorities are being pushed…