I thought basic research is the only thing everyone agreed the government could do better than the almighty free market. Why aren't there more big projects?
Universities are already a cluster fuck of too much taxpayers money so it's not like the government can be scared of picking winners
Who says there aren't 10 Manhattan projects going on right now? It's not like we would know.
Tax reformist who push 'opt in' or more discrete public voting on where tax dollars are probably the only way we'll see more public 'moonshot' and other such things get attempted/funded.
All the public can do is sorta hope the DoE Ignition facility , Lockheed Skunkworks, or whatever university someday reaches sustained fusion. If shown how much money/political energy is wasted on 'climate change' and 'green energy' I think the public could be encouraged to dump it instead into applied physics research to actually solve the issue at it's core...
>>136045126
True.
You can at least infer some of the levels of spending with all the DoE 'national labs', doing projects for the DoD, and staffed by SAIC and their ilk ... atop normal military spending like Lockheed where it's intentially difficult to decouple what the dollars ultimately get spent other than $500mm+ per plane contracts.
>>136046400
Agreed, DOD/DOE should be on it. My experience in the last two years has been the labs playing games and compromising natl security. Tried to warn the higher ups but was blackballed... oh well... Waiting for the whole thing to blow, now...