So... Is this an actual right wing film or eloborate Jewish tricks?
Just finished and I honestly can't tell
>>136005011
>Geman
It's Jewish tricks anon.
>>136005011
>Just finished and I honestly can't tell
Jewish tricks obvi. Hitler wouldn't have shot the dog.
It's jewish tricks, but the one that has the opposite effect, like Man in the high castle
>If the nazis took over there'd be no gays, no blacks and there wouldn't high arts like a fat woman bleeding on a canvas
>That's pretty good guess I like Hitler now
>>136005011
Attempted but backfired Jewish trick
It's new tricks made to look pro hitler. Like the other guy said hitler wouldn't shoot the dog. It's well known he loved animals and was a vegetarian. The characters excuse for why he did it was stupid arrogant as well.
The ending is a long spiel about how hitler is "in every German" and forces white/german guilt, since, you know, he IS evil.
It was entertaining but honestly just watch "adolf hitler: the greatest story never told" instead.
>>136005011
It's not exactly bad, German directors have a habit of inadvertently making somewhat sympathetic Hitler films like Downfall.
>>136005011
It's critial of right-wing parties, implying they could be closer to NS than visible at first-glance. However, the acting is brilliant, and if you were expecting a German movie to red-pill anyone you need to lurk more.
>>136005011
It was intended as jewish tricks, but came out as an accidental redpill.
The most interesting part is that the NSDAP had stringent animal rights laws, and would sentence animal abusers to concentration camps.
So its interesting when Hitler, who loved dogs more than just about anything else in the world, kills a dog for biting him in the movie. If I remember correctly, when the guy asks Hitler why he shot the dog, he answers that if something is a dangerous threat to you, you must end it by any means. Its an interesting parallel to jews.
It's supposed to be a warning of how another Hitler could quickly gain support.