Tell me again, what's wrong with being gay? No meme re

Why do you need to know?

>>135951791
It's not the buttfucking. It's the garbage culture of shameless debasement that all you buttfuckers embrace.

You spread disease, violence, pedophilia and drug use. You won't stop supporting every other minority interest that has the same exact problems, and you celebrate that too.

You're not degenerates because you fuck men, you fuck men because you are a degenerate.

>>135952281
i disagree. homosexuality is a sin and a public threat.

>>135951791
>no meme replies

You came to the wrong shop bucko

Because it is literally against the core instinct of an animal. At least other animals that have gay sex still have children and pass on their genetics.

File: 327890.png (89KB, 206x250px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 206x250px

>>135952481

YEP. Most gays aren't the little cute boy types who like cuddling with another cute boy and shit. They're disgusting dog fuckers and anal prolapsers

>>135952481
What the fuck

>>135951791
God hates it, and God is right about everything.

>>135952589
>sin
We can't argue based on faith, brother. The muzzies have all sorts of religious bullshit that we both know is fucked, and that is "what they believe in".

Now, how is anal sex a public threat?

File: buttmad turkish holocaust denier is annoyed by based water filter salesman.jpg (72KB, 700x504px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 700x504px

>>135952281
very nice.
i love reading someone else's terse explanation of something i cant/havent put into words.
do you write, anon?

>>135952938
> Implying anal sex is the only thing we worry about.

>>135951791
Gays are not truly gay. The uninvented and unadultured definition of gay is joyous and gays today are the opposite of this-- which explains why they off themselves more than the general populous. If the people we call gay today truly want a joyous identity then they will stop identifying themselves as being gay and just live the way they were made before they started calling that being gay.

File: Screen-Shot-2015-06-29-at-1.43.53-PM.png (983KB, 807x674px) Image search: [Google]

983KB, 807x674px

>>135951791
i think its sin, but besides that nothing


what is wrong however is pushing this agenda that everyone is a little gay and confusing a whole generation of children as to their sexual identity that had been established for thousands of years

we should not be stoneing gays, but bullshit like this only acts to cloud the whole subject and make what is abnormal normal.

>>135952938
>We can't argue based on faith, brother.
We're gonna rightfully do it anyway.

On a more practical note, fags destroy community cohesion. Why? They just do. They ruin everything. Just like the Mexicans and Blacks. Have a bunch of them around and the happiness from the world is sucked right out because they are all awful.

>>135953181

Then, outside of the diseases, drug addiction, mental illnesses and criminally deviant behaviors that correlate strongly with homosexuality, what are you worried about?

>>135953330
this

gays hate themselves, because deep down they want to be normal and can't, so they ruin it for everyone else.

>>135953330
Then you're as ignorant as a muzzie.
>why?
>because.
Wow, really stopped me in my tracks there. What a way to inspire others to follow your system of beliefs.

>>135951791
Tell me why every society that tolerated gays, either destroyed itself or was easily conquered.

>>135953330
To be more clear, I don't outright hate gays. Try to speak to God and have faith. Ask Him to make you straight. Ask Him what is wrong with you. Don't take that offensively, because there is something wrong with all of us. Maybe I'm not gay, but I lust for women pretty badly. "Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's wife," I am guilty of this and should ask the Lord for help just like a gay should ask the Lord for help with his immoral thoughts.

Being proud of homosexuality is the wrong thing to do. It's like being proud of any sort of degeneracy. I'm not allowed to be proud, neither should a gay person.

>>135951791
>Tell me again, what's wrong with being gay?
Not creating offspring and expecting strangers to take care of you when you're old.

>>135951791

depends on what you mean by 'wrong'

there are many, many things wrong with being gay, but before I can explain them you need to more clearly define your terms.

>>135951791
It prevents them from procreating.

Being attracted to the same sex isn't wrong, it's just how you're brain is programmed

Homosexual intercourse is inherently wrong though, as the anus is not a sexual organ.

There's also a huge amount of disgusting degeneracy that comes with homosexuals, such as the many inappropriate public displays some of us see weekly.

>>135952870
this

>>135951791
My dude, as long as you don't contract Leftism, the terrible disease that afflicts so many gay folks, there's nothing wrong with being gay. Even from a religious point of view, it's a problem between you and your god(s), nothing to do with me.

>>135954059
Do you consider masturbation wrong, or oral sex wrong? Neither of those body parts were designed for sexual use.

Humans get creative, and do all sorts of stuff that nature did not intend.

>>135953775
Read >>135953933
I wouldn't kill gays nor would I throw them off a roof. I would discourage them from "PRIDE" and encourage humility in them. Be bashful of your gayness, not proud of it. The Lord actually doesn't want anyone to be prideful, but thankful. I would ask for gays to seek God and genuinely ask for a cure.

File: fucking shit.jpg (31KB, 604x340px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 604x340px

is this some kind of pandering shit?

File: 2B5C28E200000578-0-image-a-2_1439555792851.jpg (49KB, 634x354px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 634x354px

>>135953775

It's nurture not nature primarily and it's tolerance leads to degeneracy in society.
Go back to how it was, men did it, other men knew they did it and they knew how to get it. If you got caught then you deserved to because you were careless

File: wtf birthingindividuals.jpg (59KB, 639x678px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 639x678px

>>135953692
>gays hate themselves, because deep down they want to be normal and can't, so they ruin it for everyone else.

SOUNDS ABOUT RIGHT

>>135954271
I can agree with this. The behavior itself is indulgent. We should all seek to be less indulgent.

>>135952481
jesus christ how horrifying

>>135954059
>>135954211
Homosexuality is not biological. I know several gay people who stoped being gay and some of them are happily married to beautiful women.

>>135954211
>Do you consider masturbation wrong, or oral sex wrong? Neither of those body parts were designed for sexual use.

What body part do you think masturbation is?

STOP SAYING "ANAL SEX"

if i cut a hole in someone else's back, and started thrusting my dick in and out, would that be sex? no, it wouldn't

why would it be any different than sticking it up someone's poophole?

it's not anal """""sex"""""", it's fecal masturbation

File: IMG_3743.jpg (27KB, 400x225px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 400x225px

>>135951791

>>135954271
>genuinely ask for a cure.
Go fuck yourself.

File: 1498913929564.jpg (6KB, 204x258px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 204x258px

>>135951791
nothing at all, anon. You do you

>>135951791
>what's wrong with being gay?
Relatively speaking, nothing. The problem is
1. Sodomy
2. Revolving your entire personality around it
Tumblr and the city of San Francisco seem to not understand this, though.

File: 1494614088310.png (298KB, 600x512px) Image search: [Google]

298KB, 600x512px

>>135954513
what about oral though?

File: IMG_5550.jpg (44KB, 268x390px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 268x390px

>>135954429

File: 3374889.gif (1MB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 320x240px

>>135954271
>gay

There is no gay. They're straight dudes who subconsciously hate women due to mother issues and/or problems with girls in their youth. Also brainwashing. This masculinity that can't find an appropriate outlet with a women due to a lot of pent-up passive aggression and self-hatred is then acted out with other males.

That's why they're typically into complete degradation and filth.

File: image.png (443KB, 1506x3976px) Image search: [Google]

443KB, 1506x3976px

>>135951791

>>135951791

Nothing, not everybody on /pol/ is against fags. Some of us are fags.

>>135954354
Oh look, there's one now, violently enforcing his faith upon others, as usual.

All the childfucking sand-niggers I killed in Afghanistan probably looked a lot like you Mohammed.

>>135954611
what about earfucking though?

guess what those three have in common - they aren't intended for penises

>>135954611
same principle applies

>>135952852
It's an anal prolapse.

>>135954652
gtfo of /pol/

>>135951791
Nothing unless you do anal sex. Prolapse, AIDs and overall unhygienic-ness make it an immoral form of intercourse.

>>135954652
At least 40% of pol is bi or gay.

>>135954446
Yeah, we do all sorts of things that aren't "biological". We make medicine and synthetic clothing.

We could stop doing those things, too, and probably also be happy.

I'm not seeing your argument.

>>135954575
If you're gay, why don't you actually try it? There is no happiness in fulfilling a gay life, you know this. If you are atheist, then why not set aside your stubbornness for a time and try to reach God? Ask Him what He wants from you, why did He make you gay, how can you become un-gay?

I'm not telling you to lie to yourself or trick yourself into thinking you are cured, but perhaps is actually works?

>>135951791
I don't give a fuck where you put your dick, it's yours.

My opinion, however, is that many gay people seem to let their entire personality center around their sexuality. In my opinion that is a simple way to go through life and will not fulfill you in the long term.

>>135954855
you can get HIV from oral, the lust itself for an other man is the damaging and contra-nature part.

File: 1417094149993.jpg (8KB, 236x249px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 236x249px

>>135954926
>bi

I'll admit that if left to my own devices, I would be straight with fetishes. There is no bisexual. There is no homosexual. Everyone is straight with fetishes. These fetishes include everything which deviates from normal heterosexual sex. This is very simple.

File: 1501283978886.jpg (153KB, 483x483px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 483x483px

>>135954661
u mad kaffir?

>>135954701
Your pencil dick can fit in someone's ear?

>>135954725
If a girl sucks me off is it degenerate?

File: 1500221464500.jpg (22KB, 600x338px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 600x338px

>>135952481

>>135955084
https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/risk/oralsex.html

The CDC says that you're full of shit.

File: 20479949_10154607283167312_37206944760358076_n.jpg (54KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 640x640px

>>135955055
Agreed.

>>135954979
Its simple. Homosexuality is not a state or status or any other genetic objectivity, it is simply an act, a very dangerous and perverted act.

>>135955135
Fetish means sexualizing an inanimate object. Preferring having sex with the same sex is by definition, not a fetish.

Repressing, or not repressing, your sexuality, is not a fetish either. I would bet at least 10% of pol is closeted repressed homosexuals.

>>135955275
>>135955275
The chances are very very slim if you have slight cuts in your mouth from brushing your teeth prior to the act, or cut the roof of your mouth on a potato chip or something.

>>135951791
>what's wrong with being gay?
Open ended question, clarify.
If you mean what's morally wrong with being gay, nothing. It's pretty gay though.
Religiously? It's against a lot of mainstream religions.
Economically? It detracts from birth rates as opposed to heterosexual couples (who can give birth)
Socioculturally? Gay parents are significantly more likely to molest their same-sex children, and damage the family unit normally. (I won't provide a source because you can't trust me or anyone else to provide an honest one. Do research please, don't believe me. I would suggest you look at crime statistics and victimology, which is how I came across my sources); likewise, they are much more likely to hamper sexual education policies of schools, and subject children to the concept of sex and reproduction at a very early (and in most minds too early) age. I share that opinion.
Militarily they hamper cohesion between units, because people are inherently and raised to be prejudiced against abnormalities, and gays are in fact abnormal.

There's more, but you didn't make a clear question, so you don't get the answer you don't ask for.

>>135955185
Not at all. The estimated death count in the War on Terror was something like two million.

You took less than ten thousand American lives, and we straight genocided your countries.

I can live happy with that.

>>135955473
>Gay parents are significantly more likely to molest their same-sex children

sauce?

>>135955135

Why is that distinction so important to you? There are some pretty homosexual people, that arent ever turned on by the opposite sex. Your saying their entire sexual identity is fetish based?

>>135955362
>Fetish means sexualizing an inanimate object.

WRONG. Sex is for reproduction. Getting shit on your chest, for example, is a paraphilia, or a fetish.

Paraphilia (also known as sexual perversion and sexual deviation) is the experience of intense sexual arousal to atypical objects, situations, fantasies, behaviors, or individuals.[1] Such attraction may be labeled sexual fetishism.

>>135954701
Wait oral isn't intended for penises?

>>135955235
Is she your wife? If yes then No, although studies show it can lead to dieses and is generally a quality of the feminin (ying) side of a man, where too much Ying energy brings about passivity and weakness.

>>135951791
Nothing inherently. The issue is that gays and bisexuals don't always have safe sex because there are lots of misconceptions about sexual health. Also, males have higher sex drives, so there's potential for promiscuity. These are hardly issues unique to gays and bisexuals though.

>>135955332
The danger can be averted with the proper precautions.

I would argue that by the definition of pervesion, most things that humans do now are "alteration(s) of something from its original course, meaning, or state to a distortion or corruption of what was first intended.)

I don't think we we ever intended to have organ transplants, either.

>>135951791
Because you get the poo poo on your ding dong.

>>135955679
the mouth was not designed for penis

>>135955636
Exactly, that is sexualizing an inanimate object, feces.

>>135955562
>Your saying their entire sexual identity is fetish based?

They've convinced themselves that they're not attracted to women and then cry after shoving dildos up their asses and jizzing because they hate themselves.

>>135951791
1. Rampant hard drug use
2. Incredible STDs
3. Early death
4. High rate of suicide
5. Miserable in old age
6. No offspring of their own

>>135954926
I think your a little high, and so is your estimate...probably 2-3% of /pol/ are fags...and thankful they don't get first class shitskin treatment they would in fuckistan...
However, I believe it to be a mental issue you suffer from, and we shouldn't execute retards...

File: 1501652315668.jpg (55KB, 312x312px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 312x312px

>>135952481

File: 1501283355858.png (289KB, 1112x2893px) Image search: [Google]

289KB, 1112x2893px

>>135951791

File: homosexuality deconstructed.png (573KB, 1506x3976px) Image search: [Google]

573KB, 1506x3976px

>>135951791
We've already covered this, you diseased boy-molesting freak.

>>135955919
When we have done polls here 40% of respondents indicate not being fully straight.

>>135952938
>how is anal sex a public threat?
stds are mostly transmitted by anal sex you faggot.

File: 1466774501855.jpg (30KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 500x500px

>>135951791
Because being gay is about being a degenerate sexually. It is not about love or reproduction. Just base desire that is offensive to right thinking individuals. This will lead to acceptance of pedophilia and beastiality.

And no amount of sad piano music will make it right.

>>135955752
>ying energy

You sound like happeh theory.

>>135955850
Source? I know these are hardly unique to gays.

File: 1501120879768.jpg (61KB, 884x596px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 884x596px

>>135951791
Homosexuals' are a biological dead end. So unless you are extraordinary you will at best cosume resources, at worst you will contribute to our downfall.

File: misplacedpride.png (262KB, 700x906px) Image search: [Google]

262KB, 700x906px

>>135951791
this should sum it all up

>>135955789
You are missing the point entirely. The danger is not merely bodily; on the physical level, but in the metaphysical, psyche of the individual caught up in the downward spiral of self-hatred and unsatisfiable lust. A human is not just a body of chemicals like a robot, no, a human is consists of a soul as well. To steward both, soul and body is to begin to master yourself in its entirety.

File: Dolan_axe_hd.png (296KB, 1244x1155px) Image search: [Google]

296KB, 1244x1155px

Also, here is what makes some goofy males think they're gay:

>It's an aggressive sperm competition thing. When guys see big dicks, especially around a girl, it makes their dick hard because it's primal competition. That's why like 95% of porn has a big dick in it. It's like your dick saying, "alright I need to cum in this girl immediately after the big dick came in her in order to propagate my genes".

Some males don't understand this due to the ever-increasing prevalence of pornography, and start to believe they're "gay" for liking dicks. There's a reason males like looking at dicks, and it's not a gay one. It's a sperm competition cue.

>>135955823
>sexualizing an inanimate object
Someone with scat fetish doesn't get turned on at the sight of a turd. It's not the object being sexualized, it's the action

>>135956063
I know that this is true for many blood borne diseases, like HIV, but I'm gonna need a source saying that anal sex is the primary statistical vector for STD's.

I bet you're wrong.

File: 1495941150682.png (425KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

425KB, 1000x1000px

>>135955477
now we're all up in your countries sucking up the benefits and stealing your women. Martyrs gonna go to heaven, kaffirs gonna burn in hell. win win.

>>135956282
>>135956094
You've already discredited yourself when you started arguing about "energies".

You sound like a spun out hippy faggot. Kys.

The animation was nice though I'll give em that

File: natureofwomen1.jpg (2MB, 1210x6307px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1210x6307px

>>135956094
Read this. It explains enough to level you up, for today.

>>135956038
Real time/life estimates are 2-3% of total population identify as gay.../pol/ will be no different...your poll was punked...

>>135955528
see the next sentence.

>>135956156
You must be very sheltered, bless your soul

File: natureofwomen2.jpg (2MB, 1210x6291px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1210x6291px

>>135956601

>>135956404
Still has nothing to do with homosexuality supposedly being a "fetish". Most gay people clean themselves prior to and after anal sex which they wouldn't do if the primary goal was to be involved in feces.

>>135956612
4% to 7% if we count younger people only. Pol attracts a lot of unusual people, including homosexuals.

>>135956665
You have no source because your claim is bullshit.

>>135955752
I don't believe in that Ying stuff. As long as she's my wife I don't see anything wrong with it.

>>135956725
Then they had their diapers taken well care of when they were toddlers. Good for them. That's where the scat fetish comes from.

>>135956876
That's nonsense.

>>135956156
https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/group/msm/index.html
There's on for the HIV. Homosexual HIV rates are staggering.

WIll bring you one for drug use and suicide.

>>135956915
No it isn't. Most people are absolutely averse to everything having to do with shit. Toddlers who mushed around in their poopie diapies, yet know it's culturally unacceptable are fine with it. That's why they fetishize it.

>>135956870
Read this, If you are having poor sex, you will understand why.

>>135956876

Here
>>135956601
>>135956698

>>135951791
you know. that was a pretty good video.
>like
>my flag

>>135956156
https://cola.unh.edu/sites/cola.unh.edu/files/student-journals/P12_Schaaff.pdf
Suicide investigation using information based on many other studies.

>>135957027
Illogical nonsense.

The fact that we even have this debate should be enough to tell you it's wrong.

File: 356735673567.png (522KB, 550x512px) Image search: [Google]

522KB, 550x512px

>>135957290
>LGBT flag

Straight man with lots of fetishes.

>>135952870
Not right enough to include it in the 10 commandments apperently.

>>135954354
for once i agree with you abdul

>>135951791
Nothing wrong. Just gross

>>135956156
And drug use.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3288601/
The other ones I don't care about.

>>135953279
this

LGBT community need to seriously come to grip with the fact that they ARE the minority of the population. the fact that they are pushing so hard for everyone to buy into the idea that "you're a little gay!" is them trying to make themselves the majority. it's purely a political move and it's disgusting. you cannot force someone into your political umbrella by lying to them repea-

oh wait, that's what democrats have been doing all along!

anyways, a good, healthy society should respect both majority and minority, no question asked, all men are made equal. however, minority need to know their place and stop trying to "become" the majority or make the majority of the people bend over backward to support them.

take the Hans in China for instance, they are the majority, China has a lot other ethnic groups beside the hans but they shut the fuck up and dont start shit because they know they arent the majority.

LGBT needs to do exactly THAT. they are fucking lucky we arent like muslims, they should have taken it as god's gift and shut the fuck up for eternity.

Assholes aren't meant to take cocks. It's biologically incorrect.

>>135959012
Babies aren't meant to be cut from the womb.
Are cesarean sections morally wrong?

>>135951791
Nothing wrong with being gay. It's gay culture. Just like nigger / ghetto / white trash culture.

Most gay people I know IRL are pretty BA and I'm glad to call them friends. They're productive members of society and you'd never even guess they're gay. It's the niggerfags that ruin it.

Every group has it's niggers but when you're a minority the niggers stand out the most and ruin it for everyone. Even us white CIS men have our niggers but we're such a huge demographic that they don't really create stereotypes that stick. Purge the niggerfags force them to assimilate. It will make everyones life better.

File: 35673567356376.png (45KB, 134x201px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 134x201px

>>135958484
LGBT is a group of deviants (everyone has a sexual fetish though) that want everyone to KNOW that they have a particular fetish.

LGBT needs to stay in the closet. No one gives a shit.

>>135956856
I said I don't provide sources because it's inherently dishonest to, I told you where to go look if you want the data.

You're just assmad and unable to form a proper question.

>>135957397
Aren't gays like... a fraction of a percent of the population?

>>135956856
>Pol attracts a lot of unusual people, including homosexuals.
Unusual people? Like conservatives? Yes...that many fags? Conservative fags? Not possible...
Fags are like niggers and jews, in that theyfor the most part support progressives...everybody looking for a gimmedat...
It is not possible for that % of consevative fags to exist, not on a Mongolian basket weaving forum...

>>135952792

We should outlaw gay stuff, but only if it's not cute. :)

File: perhaps.jpg (9KB, 290x267px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 290x267px

>>135959761
perhaps

> http://josephsciambra.com/surviving-gaybarely/
> https://www.hiv.gov/hiv-basics/overview/data-and-trends/statistics
> https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/AFSP-Williams-Suicide-Report-Final.pdf

This is why I hate faggots and the rest of the LGBT community.

File: 1501290375499.png (408KB, 1907x2074px) Image search: [Google]

408KB, 1907x2074px

>>135951791
and (((who))) owns the porn Industry?

>>135951791

It is very concerning how popular culture is using emotional manipulation to normalize sodomy. Most normal men are repulsed by any homosexual acts between men. The LGBT movement is hacking this natural defence mechanism by appealing to romantic sentimentality. People who are weak minded give into this propaganda and don't see that they have been fooled into morally supporting unhealthy and repulsive sex acts.

Women are also to blame for the traction the LGBT movement has gained. They collect male homosexual friends. They look the other way when their friend is participating in perverted behavior because in a way this helps them justify their own slutty behavior. If your wife or girlfriend has a homosexual male friend you need to step in and tell her you will not tolerate her being in the company of sex perverts. If you're a real man you will not tolerate this kind of influence entering into your family and social life.

File: fags.png (250KB, 1008x864px) Image search: [Google]

250KB, 1008x864px

I rest my case pt 1

File: faggots.jpg (750KB, 2184x1706px) Image search: [Google]

750KB, 2184x1706px

>>135961883
pt 2

>>135952852
>>135954443
>>135955249
>>135955971
i remember my first time on 4chan

File: 1500686828359.jpg (92KB, 612x816px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 612x816px

>>135954661
>another beta buttmad larper detected

>>135952629
GayJew, please stop shilling your shitty server, you fucking pedophile.

>>135959712
It's the food to be honest.

The fluoride, BPA, PET, stress, and lack of human interaction is going to be the root cause of at least half of the homosexuality.

When you cage animals they tend to behave in the homosexual manner. Cannabalism, rape, depression, ext....

Can't exactly blame the gays for everything. No doubt there are issues in every group of humans.


Is being gay natural? Yes.
Is it natural for all those dudes? No.


If they want to be gay I don't see a problem as long as they keep to themselves. Alot of them were sexually abused as children though and that can lead to a higher risk of being a sex offender.

Gay people are on the same level as pedophiles and zoophiles.

All of them are sexual degenrates who should be thrown into jail

>>135952481
Butt roses!

>>135959166
>>>135959012
>Babies aren't meant to be cut from the womb.
>Are cesarean sections morally wrong?
One is hedonistic pleasure, the other saves lives. Try again.

>>135951791
enjoy ass cancer faggot

File: IMG_0925.png (1MB, 1334x750px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1334x750px

>>135952481

>>135951791
It's gay

>>135951791
That was just another propaganda piece on the Jewtube 1/15 gay people are pedos everything you know is a lie dont believe me just look how people think about blacks and how they really are same with gays

>>135951791
This is not how gays really are that is what Jews at Jewtube want you to believe

File: 0EE4D0F2-9CF7-4D4F-B754-9B78BF963C9B-930-000002447921D27C.jpg (209KB, 906x1024px) Image search: [Google]

209KB, 906x1024px

"Homophobia" is a biological adaptation to homofaggots being disease carrying degenerates who engage in antisocial, subversive behavior.

File: the_sadness_never_ends.jpg (78KB, 639x595px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 639x595px

>>135951791
tfw you just want to live a redpilled yet normie life with a nice husbando in a nice white suburb and raise nice kids away from the vaginal jew but everyone thinks you're a degenerate

>>135951791
You ( a dude) put penis in your mouth and ass.

>>135951791

Promoting degeneracy is a goal of communism.

Don't care if you're gay but I firmly believe that everyone should breed and that gay's should just bite the bullet and have kids (there own not adopted same sex parents fuck up children mentally). But gay's have my sympathy most are gay because of some childhood trauma. In the eyes of the law I don't care if you're gay but from a moral standpoint, I think they should bite the bullet get married to some gal and have kids.

>>135951791
The fact that you're a man who shirks the responsibility to be manly, and in fact consciously and deliberately debases manliness with your degenerate habits and compulsions. That's what's wrong with being gay.

Between 24% and 90% of lesbians report being psychologically abusedby their partners.
Source: https://mainweb-v.musc.edu/vawprevention/lesbianrx/factsheet.shtml
Gay men are 60 times as likely to have HIV than straight men.
Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3462414/
46% of male homosexuals report being molested, as compared to only 7% of heterosexual men.
Source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11501300
10 to 15 percent of older homosexuals have more than 1000 sex partners.
Source: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3813477
Up to 50% of lesbians have reported sexual abuse.
Source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9360290
99.8% of lesbian, gay and bisexual teens will change their sexual orientation within 13 years.
Source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26048483
Gay men, who are 1.65% of the US population, account for 83% of the country’s syphilis cases.
Source: https://www.cdc.gov/msmhealth/STD.htm
Gay men are 10x as likely to have Hepatitis B than everybody else.
Source: https://www.cdc.gov/msmhealth/viral-hepatitis.htm
Gay/lesbian and transgender people are more likely to use alcohol/illegal drugs.
Source: https://www.cdc.gov/msmhealth/substance-abuse.htm
Homosexuals are more likely than straight people to have bipolar disorder.
Source: https://www.cdc.gov/msmhealth/mental-health.htm
Homosexuals make up 40-60% of serial killers.
Source: http://www.adherents.com/misc/hsk.html
The most common amount of partners for homosexual men is between 100 and 500.
Source: https://archive.is/lwMFm
Homosexual men are 17 times more likely to develop anal cancer than straight men.
Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4994415/
America has spent $700 million promoting gay marriage/rights abroad.
Source: https://archive.is/X6gA4

File: thumbs_EMOK_Picdump_485_067.jpg (268KB, 670x734px) Image search: [Google]

268KB, 670x734px

>>135951791

>>135969277
What's wrong with it though? Two free men can be fags if they like, as long as it's not on your lawn who cares?

File: IMG_6757.jpg (68KB, 992x558px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 992x558px

>>135951791

Torturing you pukes takes time out of the day for training.

Nothing just stop talking about it and making everyone else have to bow down to who you want to sleep with and celebrate with parades. Just do your thing quietly like straight people do. Who cares????

>>135956511

You aren't in America.

>>135970458
>America has spent $700 million promoting gay marriage/rights abroad.
>Source: https://archive.is/X6gA4

I fully support promoting faggotry in nigger countries.

File: IMG_0385.png (442KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

442KB, 2048x1536px

Other thread got deleted. I posted a number of comments on the video, these are a couple.

File: mmkay.png (262KB, 500x437px) Image search: [Google]

262KB, 500x437px

>>135951791
a lot, but we don't give a shit about the matter who cares, as long as you don't put it in our face you faggot.

File: 1463160929113.png (868KB, 491x660px) Image search: [Google]

868KB, 491x660px

>>135952281
Brilliant synopsis anon. Even children understand degeneracy is wrong no matter what they've been told by fag culture.

>>135951791
Fags deserve death, of course.

http://www.newnownext.com/straight-men-maggots-study-gay-men-kissing/07/2017/

>Straight Guys React To Gay Men Kissing The Same Way They Do To Rotting Food

>A new study shows that the images inspire a similar physiological "disgust" response in straight men.

>According to new research, when straight men look at a photo of a same-sex couple kissing, their physiological stress response is the same as when they look at a picture of maggots in a bucket.

>>135972376
>Can we make a bait link that gives us the ip address of any faggot who clicks it?
Bait: http://u?outube.m?l/6SF0X8
Log: https://g?rabify.l?ink/track/2IEX03

File: 1480666605036.jpg (562KB, 1374x3035px) Image search: [Google]

562KB, 1374x3035px

>>135972529
Nice. Here's some facts people can use in their aguments
http://imgur.com/a/FFkTv

File: 1480666716449.jpg (430KB, 1158x2020px) Image search: [Google]

430KB, 1158x2020px

>>135973805
Here's some more I saw in the comment section!

Between 24% and 90% of lesbians report being psychologically abusedby their partners.
Source: https://mainweb-v.musc.edu/vawprevention/lesbianrx/factsheet.shtml
Gay men are 60 times as likely to have HIV than straight men.
Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3462414/
46% of male homosexuals report being molested, as compared to only 7% of heterosexual men.
Source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11501300
10 to 15 percent of older homosexuals have more than 1000 sex partners.
Source: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3813477
Up to 50% of lesbians have reported sexual abuse.
Source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9360290
99.8% of lesbian, gay and bisexual teens will change their sexual orientation within 13 years.
Source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26048483
Gay men, who are 1.65% of the US population, account for 83% of the country’s syphilis cases.
Source: https://www.cdc.gov/msmhealth/STD.htm
Gay men are 10x as likely to have Hepatitis B than everybody else.
Source: https://www.cdc.gov/msmhealth/viral-hepatitis.htm
Gay/lesbian and transgender people are more likely to use alcohol/illegal drugs.
Source: https://www.cdc.gov/msmhealth/substance-abuse.htm
Homosexuals are more likely than straight people to have bipolar disorder.
Source: https://www.cdc.gov/msmhealth/mental-health.htm
Homosexuals make up 40-60% of serial killers.
Source: http://www.adherents.com/misc/hsk.html
The most common amount of partners for homosexual men is between 100 and 500.
Source: https://archive.is/lwMFm
Homosexual men are 17 times more likely to develop anal cancer than straight men.
Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4994415/
America has spent $700 million promoting gay marriage/rights abroad.
Source: https://archive.is/X6gA4

>>135951791
I... I don't know.
Every time I see him, it feels like the world is a much better place. But I'm a man. Im not supposed to feel this way.

Why can't I be normal? I don't want to like boys.

>>135972529
i was op of that thread. mods are fucking faggots.

>>135974223
as long as you don't end up being a slut or adopting a kid nobody actually cares

>>135974486
I like this leaf. You're safe on the day of holy judgement.

>>135974223
Just don't act on it. It can't be that hard to keep yourself from fucking asses, can it?

so this is the power of nu /pol/

>>135951791
No one with a modicum of intelligence really gives a shit, it has little or nothing to do with creating a better society. Before a year ago your cringey rightwing SJW shit would be hated here, but now you have tons of reddit kids who think its cool to be le counter culture

File: yep.jpg (21KB, 640x726px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 640x726px

that short film is so adorable. wow.

>>135951791
because it's degenerate as fuck
Sure, faggots are gonna go gay shit and assfuck each other one way or another, but they should be isolated from society and they should have no influence on the rest of society.

>>135975115
>unironically just said modicum of intelligence

File: ATMAIN.png (24KB, 139x141px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 139x141px

>>135975271
Please get butt fucked by a Muslim

>>135951791
because i don't like the word gay.

>>135975595
Gays are proportionately more intelligent than the average, a society which gays have no influence is necessarily going to be dumber. Denying this fact is the same as niggers saying white people aren't proportionately more intelligent. We wouldn't be shit without Plato or Turing, just for example.
>>135975825
>unironically makes a useless post with no inherent value or information

>>135951791
isn't it homophobic to use the word gay?

>>135951791
if there's nothing wrong with being gay, then why do you have a word for it?

>>135951791
No escaping the day of the rope faggots

>>135951791
Nothing. The problem is that this story was mediocre and only got high praises because of virtue signaling.

File: 10246635_884735371552201_7194102719664687322_n.jpg (41KB, 604x362px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 604x362px

>>135952281
Kinda this desu.

>>135951791
I dont know why they keep trying to force this stuff with Children, or that Parents should support kids being gay in their early 10s or even before that.
I have never met or heard of any kid in any fucking school that is gay. Most people actively start to get to know their sexual preferences and start making moves around 16, some before some after. Most people wont even realise that they are in fact gay before that age so this entire push for it is ridiculous by any standard.

>>135976616
Isn't that an assumption? At least half the attention is due to it being basically cute that many people can find agreeable. You have to watch out that political assumptions don't overtake reason, or else you're liable to become the mirror equivalent of SJW.

>>135976685
Most people getting to know preferences at 16 is a a cultural thing. We baby kids and even teenagers, through public schooling and the cultural assumption that kids are dumb and can't decide anything. We assume they can't understand sexuality which is not based in any actual realization of human nature but a selfish desire that kids have to have the age of innocence, but any observational parent will tell you that kids aren't innocent, actually the opposite of innocent. That is itself ridiculous. Its just assumption based on preconceived moral values.

File: 1450501502452.gif (980KB, 200x196px) Image search: [Google]

980KB, 200x196px

>>135977277
MOst kids are dumb and make terrible decisions all the way up into their late teens. In fact they are often dumb in their 20s too, and most of them shouldn't even leave the parents house for a long time considering how much damage they cause.

File: crying.jpg (35KB, 478x269px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 478x269px

>>135951791
STOP IT /POL/ yyou are making me cry! are you happy now?

>>135977461
Their dumbness is culturally imposed. It was common for kids as young as 13 to enter college and be independent in even the early 20th century. The age of consent was as low as 7 in some states in the 19th century. The assumption that kids are dumb and make terrible decisions comes after you purposefully dumb down kids to be dependent on the state. Do you know who originally created the scare about kids being innocent and needing the state to intervene and upping the age of consent? It was feminists. Its mind boggling that even most libertarians follow this historically illiterate line of thinking and yet still make the same arguments about other rights.

File: puke.jpg (6KB, 275x183px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 275x183px

>>135977277
I didnt say they were innocent. Kids before that Age make dumb decisions, dirty jokes and what not.
But to depict the Age bracket of 8-13 as closet Homosexual and attempt to pander to them is simply wrong, both morally and logically as most of these kids have no Idea of what they are into and simply arent mature enough to know themselves on that Level. Same goes with "trans-kids".

File: 1472426754811.png (244KB, 1200x4168px) Image search: [Google]

244KB, 1200x4168px

>>135977846
Then, until we can fix these cultural problems, there is no reason to expose poorly trained people to self-destruction.
Also THESE DAYS kids who enter into sexual activity are far more prone to risky behavior. Probably because they have sex before marriage. Until we can bring back traditional marriage, kids need to be protected from those who only wish to take advantage.

>>135952754
Gays and Lesbians have massive parties and cruises to swap genetics.

>>135978022
So you'd agree that heterosexual propagandists shouldn't try to influence kids as well? This is just a common ground since I completely disagree that kids are dumb like you say. Your position should be logically consistent. All cutesy heterosexual things would be banned as well.

>>135957397
Its clearly a form of adultery since you are only suppose to have sex with the person you make babies with.

>>135978153
Can you show me a single thing in the cartoon that was self-destructive? If anything, there's a slight undercurrent of Nietzschean self-regard which is constructive: respecting yourself above a superficial and ignorant mass.

>>135954496
hands unless you can somehow do it without actually touching yourself

File: 1448058726203.gif (608KB, 480x396px) Image search: [Google]

608KB, 480x396px

They are bad because they are degens.
They are degens because.
Great logic, pol at its finest.
I wonder how many of you guys secretly want to fuck a guy, but are too ashamed to do it. Hey, you may call me a degen, but at least I have the confidence to live my life with needing validation from internet strangers.

File: fact sheet homosex 0.jpg (3MB, 3100x1855px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3100x1855px

>>135978457
Gays are into self-destructive behavior. (pic related). Once a kid gets into faggotry, he's statistically doomed. Also your experiences when young leave a much stronger impression, so if he experiments with faggotry early on, it will be much harder for him to stop as he gets older.

Also, did you know older fags love fucking teens?

File: OYYYYYYYY.jpg (19KB, 439x440px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 439x440px

>>135978300
Heterosexuality is the Norm, both biologically and culturally. Anything related to it comes naturally, because it is the most widespread, problem free and natural sexual orientation.
Homosexuality is a deviation from the Norm and while I completly tolerate it, as I believe that people who are homosexual arent making a choice, it should not be encouraged or overly pushed. People who are homsexual tend to find out themselves. Pushing it and attempting to forcefully normalise it only leads to an influx of "homsexual" children, in it more for the attention then because they actually are gay. This in return will lead to confused children, which will make it harder for them to orienatate in later stages of their lives.

>>135952281

[_] not wrekt
[x] wrekt

>>135951791
*sigh* do I really have to type this again?

From a Christian perspective, there is nothing wrong with loving your fellow man. I played QB in high school and I kissed my receivers and lineman on the head before every game. Then I'd throw for 140-180 yards, run for 30 or 40 more, and win or lose, I'd go home and make-out with my girlfriend, who I married senior year of high school. We are still married.

But having sex with men through the hole that feces comes out of is a sin.

Sexes main purpose is reproduction. It also brings pleasure, and there is no shame in this pleasure. However, isolating that pleasure in leui of sexes natural purpose, reproduction, is a sin, plain and simple.

Thus masturbation, birth control, condoms, pulling out, and gay sex is a sin. It isolates the pleasure from sexes intended purpose, and is thus morally decaying. Gay men are basically masturbating into each others anuses, which was made only to expel human feces. it's pretty sad when you think about it.

Let us talk about that video. It is very Disney like in the sense that it gives false impressions and lies about love, and by that I mean it makes love all about feeling, emotions, and sentiment. True love has very little sentiment in it. Love is the desire to see the loved ones ultimate good achieved as far as it can be obtained. Therefor, love is actually disciplined, calm, and driven by the will. Not by emotion.

In closing, if you want to be a Christian, then you cannot be a homosexual. The cure? Complete abstinence. The homo must abstain from sex their entire life. Every disability conceals a vocation. Alcoholics must do the same thing. I am inclined to certain forms of pleasure that I cannot control and therefore will worship, so I abstain from them. Everyone does.

>>135978707
Gays are some of the most attention seeking people out their kiddo. What the fuck are you talking about? I'm saying that as a bi dude with a male partner.

>>135956000
checked

File: 1496876188647.jpg (858KB, 1748x1816px) Image search: [Google]

858KB, 1748x1816px

>>135978761
AMERICAN fags are, but so are the majority of americans, my solution? nuke america

How can any of you see all this and deny there is a God, and a Devil that is pushing all this just to spite him??

>>135978761
Do you not realize a purposefully constructed infograph from an ideological angle is going to be logically skewed? I value honesty and reason, not propaganda. If gays are self-destructive, why does the vast majority of evidence show that kids raised by gay couples fare the same as those raised by heterosexual couples?

Here's an analysis of 79! studies:
http://whatweknow.law.columbia.edu/topics/lgbt-equality/what-does-the-scholarly-research-say-about-the-wellbeing-of-children-with-gay-or-lesbian-parents/

>>135978815
You're demonstrating logical fallacies, can you explain why something being the norm makes it moral? Is most children dying young due to disease and malnutrition a moral good because it was the norm? Can you explain how this basic, cutesy cartoon showing love is acceptable between boys/men also is somehow forcefully normalizing gayness? Its already normalized because a majority don't care, one more cartoon isn't going to change much. The only people even discussing this dumb cartoon or either people who agree with it, saying its cute on social media and/or virtue signalling, or rightwing people saying homosexuality is bad because its abnormal (a stupid logical fallacy you're using, btw)?

>>135979146
Of course the society we live in today creates it's own morality, calls morality "subjective, so basically anything goes for most people. Yet insanely enough, they call out certain behavior like racism, national socialism, fascism, and the like as "obviously wrong" or it's "common sense" those are wrong, but in doing so, how can their morality really be subjective if they hold certain viewpoints and opinions to an objective standard beyond humanity? They try to say morality is subjective, but if that is the case, overreaching nazi's and north koreans and racists and national socialist are just as apt to create their own morality than anyone else. It's really pretty comical when you think about it. God only exists to the liberals and homos when it is convenient for them.

>>135951791
In through the out door

>>135951791
Nothing from a Christian perspective. This because we are in the church era (age of the gentiles) and thus under grace. Homosexuals can still be saved as long as they accept Jesus's sacrifice on the cross as payment for their sins.

We are not under the law anymore, we are under grace (faith = salvation) . The law (acts = salvation) is now just a guideline to living a good life but it is not the way to salvation.

Any homosexual (or any person for that matter) that has accepted Jesus's sacrifice as atonement for their sins will stand with him and have eternal life.

Having same sex relations doesn't exclude you from that.

>>135951791

it's propaganda

this is teaching kids ITS OK TO BE A FAGGOT when they should figure out their sexuality, naturally

get AIDS and die, OP.

>>135951791
In this video a gay guy mentions that he can't make his cat gay. This suggests that gays believe that you can make people (and children) gay. So much for "being born gay."

https://youtu.be/VmfxIYF8zN4

File: 1194146695824-1.png (364KB, 550x2500px) Image search: [Google]

364KB, 550x2500px

>>135951791
I don't need to explain. This comic I came across years ago does it for me. It's about furries but I think this also applies to people who identify themselves with the lgbt.

In a nutshell, I don't give a shit if you are gay, but if you even dare identify yourself as one and put it in a high pedestal like a special fucking snowflake, you will face a terrible amount of backlash and the same goes for whatever group/creed/race a person belongs to.

>>135954059

>it isnt wrong

WHY DID WE EVOLVE WITH MALE AND FEMALE SEX ORGANS

why does a uterus exist

how has humanity continued to this point

it's a fucking mistake, or error, to be a faggot. you can fuck a horse but that IS NOT NATURAL OR INTENDED.

File: fact sheet homosex sam hyde.jpg (501KB, 955x804px) Image search: [Google]

501KB, 955x804px

>>135979311
no, fags in other countries are just as bad

>>135978300
Shut up. Kids should be taught to be boys and girls. There doesn't need to be any guidance, when kids have good role models they will slowly develop preference for heterosexuality.

There never was any heterosexual propaganda. If you want your people to thrive then good quality men and women must get together. Homos are both unnatural and destructive. They violate the real NAP that stupid ancaps won't accept.

>>135956000
I knew this post would have been somewhere

>>135979505
>implying they wont think its bad to be gay and not actually figure out their sexuality and suppress it if there isn't basic acceptance
You're just using a fake-rational axiom to try to defend a desired imposed cultural value.

>>135979735

kids will see this and think "hey, I like my friend bob. maybe I should kiss him, I like him too!"

this is propaganda and it's sick, it misleads kids into homosexuality.

The worst part is not having a /pol/ bf. Most gays are liberals or communists.

What's wrong? All fucking homosex have aids and anal penetration is unhealthy

>>135951791
this is why god doesn't talk to us anymore

>>135951791

Nothing at all. But, they should be prevented from creating threads such as this, OP. You faggot.

File: homophobic-seal-gaaay-3.jpg (45KB, 583x576px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 583x576px

>>135951791
Because it's

>>135979701
>There doesn't need to be any guidance, when kids have good role models they will slowly develop preference for heterosexuality.
You're defending a position based on an assumption that your position is natural and anyone against it is irrational, this should be a basic red flag if you in any way desire an actually rational understanding of reality.
>There never was any heterosexual propaganda.
Many people are naturally in some line between straight and gay, so yes, forcing those people to be heterosexual and hide their other attraction is a form of propaganda, whether you will admit it or not.
>Homos are both unnatural and destructive.
Something being "unnatural" used as a moral good is a basic logical fallacy that anyone past high school should be aware of.

>>135979693
no they are not, this thing you have posted has no source for its claims, I'm going to call it bullshit, america is shit, and you are a degenerate who only wants to feel less degenerate by pointing another group which is as degenerate as you

>>135979840
No it doesn't, you're being completely dishonest. The video literally uses a heart and shows the kid infatuated with the other one, including hiding, blushes, etc. Five seconds of viewing from a person of average intelligence will show what you're saying is false. Are you even trying to fool anyone?

>>135951791
Because gays are gay!

lets pretend there was a cartoon saying it is ok to kill the infidels.

how do you distinguish propaganda from a regular cartoon? this cartoon has a CLEAR agenda.

poor attempt to be Paperman. The story is preachy, like this kid is after this other boy which you don't know if he is also gay but the end that one just sits next to the faggot but it doesn't really tells you if he is being nice or he is really gay. Is a short made by straight people who don't know how gay romance works but faggots like it because is a gay short

>>135955819
is that why your jaw is locked?

Homosexuality doesn't exist, only extreme sexual perversion. Every "gay" person I've ever known is intensely flirtatious and sexual.

File: image.jpg (47KB, 379x484px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 379x484px

>>135951791
ngl I like cute gays cuddling and doing vanilla shit like in Yaoi but in reality that's not the case

they're never vanilla, they're mental case of "oh let's try this" a literally slippery slope

pic related, real gays are not like your 2D fantasies they are sick people

>>135951791
I'm gay but keep it under control, can be wanting man ass when you have a wife and 2 kids.

>>135980297
cant"

File: IMG_1058.jpg (50KB, 381x386px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 381x386px

>>135951791

>>135955850
literally degeneracy.
>drugs
>stds
>toxins

File: image.png (155KB, 500x358px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 500x358px

>>135980294
you think all gays are cute 2D dudes drawn like anime

File: image.png (1MB, 1079x1225px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1079x1225px

>>135980397
Do you faggots you think half of them AIDS niggers are this innocent

>>135980294
is funny because japanese women who are into Yaoi don't like gays, they just like the idea of a romance between two men but if it's in their manga and anime. Two real men they find it gross

File: 2536DDC8-EF44-4942-95F2-39CD97ADE701-491-00000137AC8E6CE5.png (71KB, 1000x601px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 1000x601px

>>135980242
Heil Dickler!

I'm done

File: F029C009-2C75-41B9-B1F9-E3BFD0587152-491-000001905DC1B24C.jpg (93KB, 716x884px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 716x884px

>>135980360
So much hate! Suck my pussy.

File: Fekoff.png (253KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

253KB, 500x375px

>>135979387
Things being the Norm doesnt necessarily make it moral, that is correct. The Comparison between child diseases and infant death and heterosexuality is off by just a little, dont you think?
Hetereosexuality is the norm. It is normal. It is natural, it is the bond from which children are spawned and its evidently the easiest and least complicated way to live and to raise children.
Due to it being the Norm, cutesy things and other stuff with it comes naturally, it doesnt need to get forcefully pushed.
Before we get into a philosophical debate of what is moral and what is not, let me just rephrase the fact that I do not have anything against Homosexuals.
I just, personally, noticed a trend in narrative, in which (literal) kids struggeling with being in the closet or having crushes on people of the same sex are depicted, a group that in my opinion is statistically so small that it borderline doesnt exist. Most children tend to refrain from any form of romantic contact alltogether (Girls are gross etc.), let alone harbour intensive homosexual feelings towards someone. Therefore, I just dont see the bloody point of this. Depicting young children in homosexual relationships is just an attempt to forcefully normalise these things, making it seem like its commonplace, when in reality, it is not. Children shouldnt be the testing ground for these things, sexuality should be explained to them, and the rest should be in fact, up to them.

File: Pepesmoking.png (18KB, 509x411px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 509x411px

>>135980706
>>135979387
cont.
And no, I do not think that homosexuality is "normalised", especially with children. While it is today tolerated, and commonly accepted, which is good, and most people, as you said, simply dont care what other people do in their bedrooms, which is also good, pandering and actively promoting these things to and with children as something they should concider is in my opinion, wrong.
If they are homsexual, they will find out themselves.
It has nothing to do with this cartoon in particular, which is nicely made and depicts a cute Story. I just dont get the premise behind it, or why this is becoming more and more of a thing.

>>135980075
Faggot
>In conclusion, we can state that a substantial proportion of MSM has anal sex with casual male partners without using condoms. Several specific at-risk groups can be distinguished in this regard, including young MSM, single MSM, MSM with a low level of education, MSM with multiple sex partners, MSM who have sex under the influence of drugs and MSM with a negative attitude to condom usage. Our results indicate the presence of several potentially mutually reinforcing health problems (syndemics) in MSM: the increased prevalence of HIV and other STDs, the copious use of recreational drugs, commonly occurring sexual functioning problems and reduced psychological health (Stall et al., 2003; Vanden Berghe, 2013). It would thus be advisable to develop integrated interventions that combine different health care domains to a greater degree. This would give other professionals (e.g. sexologists, general practitioners, urologists and psychologists/psychiatrists) an important role within efforts aimed at the prevention of STDs and HIV.
https://www.rutgers.international/sites/rutgersorg/files/PDF/A%20world%20of%20difference.pdf

>>135951791
You must be mentally deranged if you do not prefer a woman as a man. There is a reason why God/nature created man and woman. Furthermore, homosexuality is degenerate and destroys the morals and decency of any society, this is why Jews push it so strongly. Once Jews created public acceptance, they organise gay prides full of degeneracy, expose the youth to it, teach it in schools, push it into your throat everywhere they can. Yet, I am not for persecuting gays, because otherwise they may feel pressured to marry a woman and pass their gay genes. Just keep it put of the public eye.

>>135980990
>sexually transmitted disease (STD) rates among men who have sex with men (MSM) have continued to increase across the United States and abroad [1–3].

https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/53/suppl_3/S79/312189/Sexually-Transmitted-Diseases-in-Men-Who-Have-Sex

>>135951791
1 post by OP, and a meme flag, yet people still give bumps. saged

File: 77e.gif (393KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

393KB, 640x360px

YOU HAVE NO REPRODUCTION MEANS, YOU ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO STICK IT INSIDE YOUR SAME GENDER'S POPO

1/2
>>135980706
>Things being the Norm doesnt necessarily make it moral, that is correct. The Comparison between child diseases and infant death and heterosexuality is off by just a little, dont you think?
How so? You're making an irrational argument that something being unnatural is somehow immoral. You'll have to actually make a logical argument as to how that works.
>Hetereosexuality is the norm. It is normal. It is natural, it is the bond from which children are spawned and its evidently the easiest and least complicated way to live and to raise children.
Again, you're just saying your own personal morality which isn't based on reason. "It is normal. It is natural. It is good."
>Due to it being the Norm, cutesy things and other stuff with it comes naturally, it doesnt need to get forcefully pushed.
How is a cartoon being forcefully pushed? How do you think someone is going to be able to decide their own sexuality if culture says that a sexuality is immoral and you shouldn't be that way? You're making the tired old assumption that people are inherently straight and its culture making them gay, its irrational. Your supposed and fake position that kids should be free to choose their sexuality when you're okay with culture not accepting one is just entirely dishonest.
>Before we get into a philosophical debate of what is moral and what is not, let me just rephrase the fact that I do not have anything against Homosexuals.
Your positions actualized would have negative impact on them, so your dislike or like is irrelevant.

2
>>135980706
>Therefore, I just dont see the bloody point of this. Depicting young children in homosexual relationships is just an attempt to forcefully normalise these things, making it seem like its commonplace, when in reality, it is not. Children shouldnt be the testing ground for these things, sexuality should be explained to them, and the rest should be in fact, up to them.
Giving gay kids a positive outlook on their attraction = a bad thing, this is your position. You're defending it irrationally by saying that its statistically small, we don't need it, it should be up to them, etc. You're just ignoring that without positive role models and cultural things to make them comfortable, it wouldn't be up to them, they'd be crushed by the social norm.
>pandering and actively promoting these things to and with children as something they should concider is in my opinion, wrong.
You're assuming that's what happening instead of gay people making a cute cartoon they think will empower gay kids who were afraid before.

>>135980216
Good to know that you can see what's wrong with the short

>>135980990
well then we should compare it to the population of straights and see how much of a diference there is, I can talk for the dutch, I am spanish, but here all gays I have meet where or in a relationship or very christians and chaste or just not total whores
>>135981005
this is about the USA you alredy know what I think about americans

>>135981203
then do not have oral sex with anybody, your motuh was made for food, not for sucking dicks or licking vaginas

>>135982339
It says right there "united states and abroad" abroad means other countries, like Europe.

File: George-Soros-God.jpg (40KB, 700x465px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 700x465px

>>135951791
thanks for helping to normalize pederasty!

File: hmmmmCat.png (325KB, 382x417px) Image search: [Google]

325KB, 382x417px

>>135981223
>How so? You're making an irrational argument that something being unnatural is somehow immoral.

Child Death due to Disease and Malnutrition was never moral, nor something worth achieving.
You are comparing something utterly horrible that was sadly commonplace to heterosexuality, equating them and saying they should both be seen as "moral" because they were commonplace. There is an inherit difference between something being commonplace because it aids the population, and something being commonplace because the population cannot do anything about it, its out of their hands.
Heterosexuality is commonplace because it is necessary. Again, it is natural. Im not saying that to say that Homosexuality is unnatural and therefore bad, im saying that because no species that works the way ours does could survive if heterosexuality weren't natural, and weren't the norm. If we or any other species with the same way of reproducing like we do randomly decided to suddenly all be gay they would be extinct within a generation. This isnt about Morality, wether or not being Gay or being straight is normal or not, it is simply natural. It is the way we reproduce, the way we ensure the next Generation, it is objectivly the way that Nature had in mind for us. Homosexuality is therefore a deviation from this, as it doesnt enable Children. This does not mean that it is inherently immoral. Heterosexuality being commonplace stems from the same factum, that it is natural. I was never equating something
that everyone does with it being Moral, or the Norm being Moral, even though the latter is usually true, as morals arent set in stone and differ from culture to culture.

>Again, you're just saying your own personal morality which isn't based on reason.
As explained above this isnt my personal Morality. Heterosexuality being "natural" is simply Biology. If it wasnt the Norm and not Natural we would probably have gone extinct quite a while ago.

>>135982534
it does not specify which, we must also remember that the netherlands have prostitutes in expositors in their streets, it’s not exactly the best country in Europe, try one like Austria

>>135982554
You're missing the point entirely. You constructed a morality based on a norm being moral. If a norm is moral, high infant mortality is normal. If that's not the case, and if you wish to be an honest person, you can retract your former position. Just because you are too ignorant to realize that your position that heterosexuality is normal leading to healthier peeple vs. homosexuality based on a norm, with naturalistic fallacies, etc, being a moral argument, doesn't mean you're not making a moral argument. You're being childish. There's apparently no way to make you understand your argument is a moral argument. You'll have to realize that on your own, or don't. You realize making qualifications of virtue saying that you don't have anything against homosexuality doesn't change the argument you're making without those qualifications? Its useless to me.
>There is an inherit difference between something being commonplace because it aids the population, and something being commonplace because the population cannot do anything about it, its out of their hands.
>Heterosexuality is commonplace because it is necessary.
You defeated your own argument there. Heterosexuality is no longer necessary because of technology. Just as high infant mortality is no longer necessary because of technology. Anyway I must end the argument there, no offense but you're thick-skulled.

>>135983076
Ugh sorry I have to restate that, you're not thickskulled most likely, you're most likely just young and haven't been fully intellectually matured. Its too common for people to insult immature people, but immature people being more ignorant isn't a mark of low intelligence, that's stupid.

>>135951791
It's an abomination unto the Lord. Also, a slide thread.

File: Ew.png (27KB, 113x113px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 113x113px

>>135981223
This Cartoon isnt the Problem. I have only noticed a trend similiar to it, depicting young children in the Closet as a widespread problem. Teenagers, sure, but why is this necessary? People who turn out gay usually make this discovery at a far later stage. Why would they need (gay) role models? Why would you want to actively encourage young children to be gay?
Shouldnt it be avoided to allow them a life as normal as possible, without all the stress and fears that come with being homosexual?
It should not be repressed of course, but neither should it be encouraged, pushed, as something they should definitly try out, etc. They would just end up as confused adults, struggeling with this conflict for many years of their adult lives.
Im not saying it is culture making them gay, but you simply cant know what happens when you encourage homosexual behaviour with little kids.
Its more likely to damage them, then to aid anyone in their "struggle". For one in half a Million kids that age who actually are in such a situation you get 499.999 who would be disturbed or simply apalled if this were shown to them.

>Your positions actualized would have negative impact on them, so your dislike or like is irrelevant.

How so? None of my positions actively attempt to attack or discredit them. Im all for leaving them alone to be who they want to be. I simply fail to see the point of pandering to a non-existing Audience of Elementary School Children in the Closet, in hopes of memeing this Crowd into reality.
Im all for positivity for them, but as stated, most kids that age ARENT GAY. They dont even think about Gay. They dont know Gay.
I know Trannies, I know Homosexuals, none of them even thought about these things before they hit puberty. None of them ever came out before that. That does not mean that everyone is the Same, but this just forces itself into an Age bracket that has no business with this stuff. Not yet.

>>135955055
>I don't give a fuck where you put your dick, it's yours.

So, they can fuck children then?

File: Drinking Snake.gif (2MB, 270x188px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 270x188px

>>135983300
>>135983076
>Ugh sorry I have to restate that, you're not thickskulled most likely, you're most likely just young
>He goes back on something that may have been insulting because hes nice

You're quite the cutie desu.

What I can see is that you keep spinning around Morality. I didnt say Homsexuality is immoral, nor is Heterosexuality automatically moral. Morality is a much deeper concept and the question what is, and what isnt Moral or how we determine what is Moral has been in discussion for the last two Millenia.
My standpoint was that Heterosexuality is natural, not from a Moral point of view, but from an objective, biological point of view.
This doesnt make Homosexuality completly unnatural, it simply means that Heterosexuality is THE natural sexuality, THE thing that nature had in mind for us, and btw statistically the happiest stablest and with the least likelyhood to raise fucked up kids.
The Question of Homosexuality is moral or not isnt my concern. What you or anyone else does in their free time is your business, not mine.
What I, in fact saw as "immoral" and where I used that word, was to describe the way some people attempt to force homosexuality into an age bracket that has no business with it, that doesnt need it and would only grow up confused. They need to discover it themselves, without "role models" and make the decision to follow these desires or dont. But they wont do it at that age and being confronted with something like that could in fact disturb them more then aid them.

>>135983780
Your arguments are irrational. Its common to come to a conclusion you think is rational and passionately defend it, but you're coming against a brick wall. Your major assumption here is thinking heterosexuality is a norm, and you fail to realize this is an irrational moral assumption. The antidote is probably a study of history. If you read Plato, and learn about the Theban sacred band, you could understand the reverse of your argument, that imposed heterosexuality as a norm (based on it being immoral to force someone to be heterosexual because its damaging, based on the normal culture) is damaging itself in that context. Heterosexuality being the norm isn't a natural thing, its an imposed cultural paradigm based on the need of reproduction, nobles needing a peasant mass for productivity. In other words, you're defending an irrational and cultural *moral* position, not a rational one. Your entire argument is based on homosexuality potentially being harmful within a cultural context, saying that the virtue of making homosexual relation normal only benefits a minority, etc. I cant help you out of this bind, and its possible you won't come out of it, but you seem like an intelligent person and its my basic obligation to attempt at least to explain things. I don't have the time beyond now though.

>>135983076
Also:
>Heterosexuality is no longer necessary because of technology

EVALUATE. I unironically want to know what you mean by this.

1. Getting your shit pushed in.
2. Dude, if getting your shit pushed in isn't enough to persuade you not to be a faggot then I'm not sure what to tell you.
Now put a bandaid on your AIDs and make another thread about why God isn't real faggot.

>>135984735
Sad that we havent come to an understanding, you do seem like a smart fella so im not gonna hate.
I get your points, but cannot agree with them and it would take too long right now to evaluate further.
You are bringing culture and historic examples into it now, and with that alone I could talk for hours with you.

I didnt say that Homosexuality is damaging to the Population, I said that forcing it into the Age Bracket of Elementary Students is unnecessary and potentially damaging to that group.
In our times it seems to be increasingly common to force Homosexuality into every aspect of ordinary life, because the people doing it hope to see their own homosexuality validated that way. Or maybe they just think they can make it easier for future generations, which is noble but not really helping.

>>135951791
Why do you have to force it down everyones throat

>>135951791
I swear to God this kids heart is really annoying me. Stay inside your owner dammit!

>>135951791
The cultural Marxism that's invaded the homo ranks. It is now normal for homosexuality to become your entire identity. You are no longer Paul, who enjoys soccer and hiking, you are now Homo #467 who likes sucking dick and thinking about sucking dick.

>>135951791
Nothing but it brings up repressed feeling and emotions i have had about members of the the same sex and this angers me on a subconscious level.

File: 1485191516140.jpg (58KB, 589x589px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 589x589px

>>135952281
degenerate faggots BTFO

File: 1497933031888.jpg (20KB, 300x365px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 300x365px

>>135957397
Oh was his torching of an entire faggot city not blatant enough for you to get the picture?

>>135985429
This, this, this. I couldn't have said it better.

>>135951791
Just my 2 cents on the issue. I had a gay experience in Summer Camp when I was 7. My bunkmates were experimenting, and made me their mo-fo unwilling guinea pig. I was blindfolded during the whole thing, feeling an 8-year old's dick up my ass. I was not thrilled from the ordeal. But last January, I became curious from the recalling of the feeling, so I asked Jerry to show me a night. At first it was neutral, then he made out with me; his breath was minty with a hint of garlic from something he ate; it was cool with me. Then he told me to suck his dick, and I did; the taste and sight did not thrill me. And he sucked mine. He got a rise out of me, but then I started to feel uneasy. It was minor at first, and I promised myself I'd see this through. Finally, he was in me doggy style. As he humped me, I was feeling it both in my penis, and in my gut; worsening as he went on. And eventually, I embarrassed myself grossly. I came AND fucking threw up simultaneously. Jerry had not come yet himself, and out of respect, he withdrew himself and asked me if I was okay. He cleaned me, and my mess on his floor up. I felt soo damn ashamed, but Jerry was kind and understanding to me. And it was then I confirmed it for myself that I was not gay, and Jerry and Dino agreed with me. So with that, I was able to move forward feeling more confident in my orientation.

>>135952281
/thread everybody out. Remember last one out turns off the light.

File: 1494665564357.jpg (44KB, 429x410px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 429x410px

>>135956071
Good post.

>>135956335
Never thought of it like that. Wtf

This is from hiv.gov

Homos are 85x more likely to have an STD

File: Gaëtan_Dugas.jpg (20KB, 250x384px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 250x384px

I've got gay cancer. I'm going to die, and so are you.

>>135986546

We thank you for participating in our "Future Leverage" program. Your IP, adress and name has been saved.

If you dare seeking to challenge us or the current order we will fully release all obtained data.


t. CIA

Tell me what's so great about being a fag? No meme reply about muh love is love. Honestly, what's to be celebrated about two guys bumming each other while high on crystal meth in a bathroom stall?

>>135951791
Being gay is an evolutionary defect.

>>135951791
SO MANY AWARDS, IT MUST MEAN THAT BANGING ANOTHER MANS DIRTY ASSHOLE IS A GREAT THING TO SHOW OUR KIDS NOW

File: boy romance when no other boy around.jpg (147KB, 1360x1200px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 1360x1200px

>>135951791
They started with boy + girl romance, then they introduced sex education at schools, now it's boy + boy romance. Isn't this creating more underage relationships and opening possibilities of Epstien romances?

>>135987311
You have to ask good for who?

It is good for Jews because
>Makes the society more degenerate
>Symbolic act against conservatives and Christianity (although it is a kike religion it still has a few good values)
>Platform for even more degeneracy and perversion as expressed at gay prides
>Taught in schools, children are influenced by the gay agenda, develop identity disorders
>Reduces White birth rate (yet it may be actually good they do not pass their gay genes)

>>135951791
It's not normal. I don't care that people are gay, just don't be a faggot about it and rub it in my face.
SJWs want to make everyone lgbtwtfbbq and are on a crusade against normalcy, and I want them all to die.

they want to normalize this to kids, because if it is normalized, it legitimizes their mental illness.

make no mistake, it's a flaw. a fundamental error. men and women are made to breed for a reason.