Who has the better personality?
Like if they were both women your age with tits and thiccness, who'd you date?
http://www.strawpoll.me/13608726
>>135948888
I think this literally may be the single most stupid post I have ever seen on any board on 4chan
>>135948888
>>135949415
your quads are nothing but wasted digits
I stand with the jap on this one
also, Mike "push a wojak, hear the thunder crack" Pence is disappointed in you due to this right wing faggotry
>>135948888
I went with Pence. I like Trump, but I wouldn't want a wife who could btfo me all the time.
>>135948888
you seem like a very confused person
Pence is an Israel 1st neo-con, Establishment GOP'er. You might as well support Jeb Bush if you like Pence.
Proclaimed that "Israel's Problems, are OUR problems", said he'd be tough on Russia...why? because they intervened when our moderate CIA backed McCain loving head choppers were trying to overthrow Assad.
Pence sucks dick.
>>135949848
>cant get majority REP senate to vote on your bill
>btfo people
>>135948888
Lmao. Trump wont make another term if he keeps going on with the self-destructive behavior.
Holy fuck, why is everyone voting Pence?
>all these Pence niggas
Bruh
>>135948888
Pence for sure; Trump cheats routinely on his partners, Pence won't dine alone with the opposite sex
Also if my kids turn out to be faggots or trannies she'll get the batteries
>>135948888
I prefer Trump as president, but Pence is the obvious choice to date. He would be a christian conservative qt that would be forever loyal.
>>135953726
Different genders, different standards.
People put up with Trump's behaviour in males, but would you put up with a female Trump? Fuck no.
>>135959474
>https://www.nyu.edu/about/news-publications/news/2017/march/trump-clinton-debates-gender-reversal.html
They actually did an experiment on that and found people much preferred a female Trump.
>"Salvatore says he and Guadalupe began the project assuming that the gender inversion would confirm what they’d each suspected watching the real-life debates: that Trump’s aggression—his tendency to interrupt and attack—would never be tolerated in a woman, and that Clinton’s competence and preparedness would seem even more convincing coming from a man."
>"Many were shocked to find that they couldn’t seem to find in Jonathan Gordon what they had admired in Hillary Clinton—or that Brenda King’s clever tactics seemed to shine in moments where they’d remembered Donald Trump flailing or lashing out. For those Clinton voters trying to make sense of the loss, it was by turns bewildering and instructive, raising as many questions about gender performance and effects of sexism as it answered."