Was Democracy itself a mistake? Or just letting non-land

>>135886355
Democracy was not - but giving anyone an equal amount of votes was.

We need to distribute the amount of votes proportional to your power-factor.

>>135886613
We already have that, it's called the Electoral College
My vote is worth more than a Commiefornian's because of it

>>135886355
So what if we have a democracy, right, but limit the franchise to people that make a tangible contribution to society? Like military or police service, education, or public health.

The idea being that the primary quality you want in voters isn't intelligence, or economic success. It's a willingness to put the good of their society ahead of their own desires.