Is this book a legitimately good read from an ideological point

It's neither of those.

If you want good ideological literature, don't go for the neonazi 1488 hyper-right-wing stuff. It's mostly just red herrings, garbage, or controlled opposition. You have to be highly selective with your choice of literature to get the real meat.

>>135860809
I've tried to read it a few times. It's a lot of rambling. If you can follow stream of consciousness then maybe it'll be a good read, but I'd still warn against it

>>135860809
It's ok. Not great desu.
I got through the first volume and stopped due to boredom and rambling. He tends to go on tangents. Il read the second volume eventually.

>>135860809
It's a must read. Ignore the shills.

>>135860809
Its called Esoteric Hitlerism. That is the real deal

>>135860809
You can start with Adolf Hitler - The Ultimate Avatar by Miguel Serrano

>>135860809
Why does he look so mean? :(

>>135860809
It;s speculated whether he even actually wrote it, Hitlers table talk and hitlers second book are essential reads.

>>135860809
Its pretty good, his 2nd book was better though.

>>135861353
there are lot shittty translations desu. Also he uses lot of german metaphors that are uninteligible to foreigners, and also a lot of historical references that are hard to understand to contemporaries.
Check out youtube, there is mein kampf audiobook with commentary. that should be more accessible. people usually call it wierd ramblings because it was written for early 20th century germans.

Marx did the same thing when he wrote. But he was also well educated and used loads of literary references and allusions. that makes his writings even harder to understand. While we are at it, Luther also used some wierd references and when Italian church officials read it, they thought he is fucking nuts. Germans just write for Germans, and if you dont know their meta, you wont understand

If you want to learn about how vile Jews really are, then read this.

Any questions about how and why they do what they do, Hitler answered 80 years ago.

It's the ramblings of a mad man.

>>135862929
>It's the ramblings of a mad man.
Normie rambling

File: s-l1000.jpg (91KB, 800x593px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 800x593px

>>135860809
Propaganda, the ideology got roasted. Move on.

File: 1464156792668.jpg (53KB, 504x604px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 504x604px

>>135860809
It's a good starting point that will leave you with a lot of questions. I just ordered Hitler's Table Talk to get a better idea of what he's actually like.

I'd check out Myth of the 20th Century and Foundations of the 19th Century for more details about the Aryan stuff.

If you read Mein Kampf you'll quickly realize Hitler didn't put much value on literature. He was much more of a spoken word kinda person.

It's about His Struggle. It describes his life and the justifications. You are all basically getting upset at the pretext for the justifications behind the results because they aren't as interesting as the results. There are some good primers if you catch them.

Mostly just emo bitching about why he believes Jews were responsible for all of Germany's problems, and therefore, for his personal shortcomings and struggles. He was an excuse maker and a larper.