Thread replies: 8
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
File: cigarette_thinkstock.jpg (42KB, 645x363px) Image search:
[Google]
42KB, 645x363px
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-40758495
>The policy announced on Friday has a goal of cutting back on nicotine levels in order to discourage addiction and lower the number of US smokers.
I guess I'll finally be switching to electronic cig-
>The policy will also apply to e-cigarettes, which are also known as tobacco vaporisers.
Nope, suicide it is. Thanks nanny state.
>>
>>135805653
More shilling by BAT.
The policy laid out won't control nicotine in e-cigs. It gives e-cigs a blank check extension for another 5 years, with a promise to lower the cost of regulatory.
Previous deadline was no new products after Aug 8th, 2007. Then 2016. Filing cost est $1M per SKU, enforced in a few months.
This basically sets limits on nicotine for tobacco cigs, and lets ecigs do whatever they want through 2022.
>>
>>135805653
ill just chew nicotine gum while smoking....
>>
>>135806112
>lets ecigs do whatever they want through 2022.
That's good at least. I'm already 30 and don't imagine I'll live much longer than 2022 anyway.
>>
>not smoking marijuana or drinking ayahuasca
>2020
>>
>>135806766
I would if I could buy those things at the gas station.
>>
>make people smoke more tar to get the same effect from nic
wow sure seems like a good way to improve smoker health!
>>
>>135808200
I agree with this. I'm a big fan of the decision, but this part seems shortsighted to me.
Thread posts: 8
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1