Libertarians, to what extend would you agree/disagree with this

>>135800625
>child porn

only if it's of yourself when you were a minor

>>135800625
>Muh limited government is total anarchy

Ah what a classic argument. Right up there with "Muh roads!" Thinking that the government is too involved in my everyday life doesn't mean I'm ready to return to a Hobbesesque state of natural anarchy.

>>135801281
This is a sincere and honest tweet by a self identifying libertarian professing how he would like the world to be.

>>135800625
I have never seen a gay person in my life. Why should I give a shit about what they do?

>>135802919
Its a delusion and degeneracy of the mind. You've never met one in your life because Russian Culture as commendably opposed it.

>>135801038
would you actually be considered a criminal if you masturbated to yourself when you were a child ?

>>135801281
Shutup flaggot

File: youre_a_liar.jpg (80KB, 607x584px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 607x584px

>>135801580
>Lying potatonigger

Making child porn of another person's children is directly harming the children, which is a violation of the NAP. Seeing as how those siblings are gay, they won't be doing it to their own kids as they won't be able to have any.

>>135803530
>You've never met one in your life because Russian Culture as commendably opposed it.
Exactly. Community doesn't need legislature to ward off undesirables. Average people don't make affirmatie action or gay rights into laws. Imagine a private business with at-least-20%-shitskin-staff policy. Only government does shit like that. So why am I supposed to believe that some corrupt left-leaning psychopathic professional politician will make better decision for me, my family and my people than we would make on our own?