Is direct voting via referenda a better way to do politics than

Short answer: No.
Long answer: Yes.

>>135797607

No. I'd rather not have mob rule, thanks.

>>135797607
Yes.

>>135797607
YES !!

>>135797607
either way democracy is shit ,unless you have 500iq population versed in every single topic .

>>135797607
The Libyan system seemed pretty nice actually, though my understanding is more like direct voting on certain things, and local election of representatives on others.
In the long run, direct referenda on all policy decisions is just a stand in for tyranny of the majority.

>>135797797
Yes, I'm sure you'd much rather have rule of a small financial-business superelite composed of things like pharmaceutical companies, telecommunications networks, etc.
> Why aren't you paying for your extra internet privileges right now, goy?
> What, what do you mean you want cheap healthcare?

there needs to be more incentive for education in america.

don't boink girls who don't study
don't boink guys who don't study

>>135797607
>>135797766
There's no short/long answer here, only historical facts to base a viewpoint on.

Democracy is a farce, tyranny rule of the 51%, which is nothing more than mob "justice" masquerading as a form of government.

A republic takes public opinion, puts it into the hands of "qualified" representatives, and, when not usurped by unnecessary constitutional amendments and errant interpretations from judicial leftists, works.

>>135799285

False dichotomy, nigger. If we're going to argue, let's avoid the logical fallacies, shall we?

Fucking mental midget.

>>135799782
Here's one then, how is electing representatives via democracy any different than indirect mob rule?