Okay, let's see how much you know about what you hate.

>>135780735
I have one :
the idea that added value should be taken seriously, when in fact it does not takes the price variation into account. therefore we have a conflict with the basic understanding of price and value. In a perfect society we should pay salaries based on the value, that is what marx was thinking, but that is not possible since the demand can vary making the price drop. If we keep paying same salaries then the worker must be fired or get into a deal with his employer otherwise the employer will have to fire everyone when he shuts down his company.

>>135780735
oh in english you guys probably call that Surplus value. sorry on the mistranslation.

File: IMG_1711.jpg (15KB, 125x113px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 125x113px

>>135780735
>Marx
Stopped reading right there

>>135781631
>>135781946
But price is value, and surplus value is price minus the cost of production. Since workers own the means of production, whatever they sell it for is their wage.

>>135780735
The idea that humanity is destined for some final form of economy is retarded beyond belief. Societies change as technology changes, and while we may be able to predict the next way we organize ourselves, no one would say the next system is the last.

File: 1482221662364.jpg (27KB, 500x741px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 500x741px

>>135780735
All of his ideas on the value of labour and the disconnect workers experience from the fruits of said labour or retarded and come from a man who's never labored in his life

>>135780735
Marxism is based on Hegelian Dialectics which is a mystical mumbo-jumbo.