What is the difference between flat earth theory and simulation

>>135703676

simulation theory was made by jews as an expansion to their made-up science and thus is backed by the pseudo-academia. on the other hand flat earth theory has been the actual model of universe for centuries and thus actively ridiculed by the jews. if you want to know the truth just look at what is ridiculed by the jews.

>>135703676
>simulation theory
>rational
is this theory gaining widely acceptance?

dasdssdfdsdfdfdfsdfsdfsdfsdfdsgfg

>>135703676
The simulation theory is the same as the multiverse theory: Western scientists looking for a way to explain mathematics being effective; the improbability of life; and the origin of our universe (given the taxicab fallacy) without admitting that God (or any creator) could be a valid scientific theory. You don't get money from universities for that.

>>135703676
you can't disprove simulation theory while you can easily disprove flat earth.

>>135704957
I don't think its alleged disprovability is the reason flat earth is seen as a ridiculous concept. Most "rational" people get butthurt at the very thought.

>>135705139
Because there'd be no reason to keep it a secret?

>>135705518
The rationale behind why a flat earth is unlikely is irrelevant to why the concept is immediately scoffed at as silly... obviously. The rationale for why it is unlikely is irrelevant to the immediate feeling of butthurt the concept elicits, which does not happen with simulation theory.