Thread replies: 6
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
File: Egoist_anarchism.png (1KB, 324x216px) Image search:
[Google]
1KB, 324x216px
"Whoever knows how to take, to defend, the thing, to him belongs property." "What I have in my power, that is my own. So long as I assert myself as holder, I am the proprietor of the thing." "I do not step shyly back from your property, but look upon it always as my property, in which I respect nothing. Pray do the like with what you call my property!".
>>
Truly the purest anarchy. But not a pragmatic model for society.
>>
>>135582297
>Whoever knows how to take, to defend, the thing, to him belongs property
So, can the government participate in this game?
>>
>>135584458
They already are. Everybody already is. Most just don't realise it.
>>
"purest anarchy", possibly, but unfortunately it almost inevitably turns into ARCHY almost immediately, as those with strength or numbers rule over those without, ie it is a temporary, unstable state that defaults to worst ARCHY.
Hence why Ancap is superior: the NAP is not truly imposed on anyone, since if you happen to disagree and wish to agress people, you may...as long as you are willing to face the consequences of being agressed in return (and no self consistent morality can be made that allows one to agress another but doesn't allow the other to defend themselves if they choose). In the other hand, it is the least arbitrary, least imposing rule so far discovered that creates a potentially stable society.
>>
Though, at the end of the day, OP might equals right is the underlying rule of the universe.
Thread posts: 6
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1