Thread replies: 22
Thread images: 7
Thread images: 7
File: chillin.gif (906KB, 320x240px) Image search:
[Google]
906KB, 320x240px
Truths about slavery in the USA
1. SLAVERY WAS AN ANCIENT AND UNIVERSAL INSTITUTION, NOT A DISTINCTIVELY AMERICAN INNOVATION.
2. SLAVERY EXISTED ONLY BRIEFLY, AND IN LIMITED LOCALES, IN THE HISTORY OF THE REPUBLIC – INVOLVING ONLY A TINY PERCENTAGE OF THE ANCESTORS OF TODAY’S AMERICANS
3. THOUGH BRUTAL, SLAVERY WASN’T GENOCIDAL: LIVE SLAVES WERE VALUABLE BUT DEAD CAPTIVES BROUGHT NO PROFIT.
4. IT’S NOT TRUE THAT THE U.S. BECAME A WEALTHY NATION THROUGH THE ABUSE OF SLAVE LABOR: THE MOST PROSPEROUS STATES IN THE COUNTRY WERE THOSE THAT FIRST FREED THEIR SLAVES.
5. WHILE AMERICA DESERVES NO UNIQUE BLAME FOR THE EXISTENCE OF SLAVERY, THE UNITED STATES MERITS SPECIAL CREDIT FOR ITS RAPID ABOLITION
6. THERE IS NO REASON TO BELIEVE THAT TODAY’S AFRICAN-AMERICANS WOULD BE BETTER OFF IF THEIR ANCESTORS HAD REMAINED BEHIND IN AFRICA.
Article:
https://townhall.com/columnists/michaelmedved/2007/09/26/six-inconvenient-truths-about-the-us-and-slavery-n876052
>>
>>135577862
America fucked up because they made slavery a racial issue than what it had been for millenniums.
>>
File: Jewish control over American slavery.jpg (127KB, 602x430px) Image search:
[Google]
127KB, 602x430px
>>135577862
slavery is a jewish institution designed to mongrelize america like they did with brazil
>>
File: 1501330173948.gif (3MB, 600x396px) Image search:
[Google]
3MB, 600x396px
>>135577862
Why they don't teach this I'll never know
>>
Weren't whites enslaved as well?
>>
File: Expalning.png (655KB, 683x572px) Image search:
[Google]
655KB, 683x572px
>>135578055
hmm yea that is not the case those slaves you see where bought from the Arabs on the ivory coast so yeaa not really.
Oh and mmmm yeah lets not forget that the slaves that went to Arab states had their genitals cut off mmm yea and only 1in2 survived and the women became sex slaves if we could just keep that in mind that would be great.
>>
File: tfw_orange_fools.png (171KB, 356x355px) Image search:
[Google]
171KB, 356x355px
>literally create an ethnic group as a permanent underclass
>provide little-to-no resources for them after they are free
>discourage them from assimilating into the mainstream for generations
What did America mean by this?
>>
File: 1496901430353.jpg (147KB, 960x720px) Image search:
[Google]
147KB, 960x720px
>>135578710
>>provide little-to-no resources for them after they are free
Why did Booth have to go and fuck everything up before Lincoln could hand out free boat rides.
>>
>>135578876
Lincoln only ever supported voluntary emigration to Africa, and he abandoned that position mid-way through the Civil War, when he realized ex-slaves didn't want it.
>>
>>135578336
if you consider irish white (which you shouldnt)
>>
>>135578985
He would have done something better than just leaving them to their own devices like Johnson did.
>>
>>135578055
america fucked up by even letting (((white people))) inhabit the south before the advent of the air conditioner
>>
>>135578710
Blacks in the USA were doing better in the USA while under Jim Crowe laws than they are doing today.
Ever heard of black wall street?
They went from a literacy rate of less than 10% to over ninety percent in one generation.
They had less single mother house holds than white people.
Welfare programs destroyed black america
>>
>>135578985
funny thing about that is the american blacks who did go to Liberia made slaves out of the native Liberians.
HAHAHAHAHAHA
>>
>>135579764
>Blacks in the USA were doing better in the USA while under Jim Crowe laws than they are doing today.
[citation needed]
I'm sure blacks would be doing much better had Jim Crow never existed.
>Ever heard of black wall street?
Didn't a bunch of rednecks burn that down?
>They went from a literacy rate of less than 10% to over ninety percent in one generation.
When?
>They had less single mother house holds than white people.
How was this a result of Jim Crow?
>Welfare programs destroyed black america
[citation needed]
>>135580077
That's shitty of them. I'm more interested in domestic racial issues.
>>
>>135580211
One generation after slavery was banned they increased their literacy rate to 90%.
They did well despite Jim Crow laws not because of it.
>>
>>135580617
Okay, and?
>>
>>135577862
>1. ancient and universal
>2. existed only briefly and in limited locales
Are we just going to ignore this? You contradicted yourself in your first two points.
>>
>>135582073
he meant the ancient practice of slavery was limited in the united states. fucking relax.
>>
>>135579764
>Blacks in the USA were doing better in the USA while under Jim Crowe laws than they are doing today.
Niggers are literally subhuman and need very strict laws to keep their animalistic instincts under control. They were better behaved when they knew we would hang them. They were better motived when they knew we would let them starve to death. Black students were more attentive in class when they knew they could get their asses beaten by their teachers, and when there weren't white girls beside them for them to harass.
>They went from a literacy rate of less than 10% to over ninety percent in one generation.
Take that with a grain of salt. First of all, that was OUR accomplishment, not theirs. No niggers in the history of the world ever developed written language (or the wheel). Second, because they are inferiors, our standards for them have always been low Most of the "literate" niggers even today aren't really literate by the standards a reasonable person would hold them to.
>They had less single mother house holds than white people.
>>
>>135578710
Pretending evolved racial intelligence differences aren't equal.
Thread posts: 22
Thread images: 7
Thread images: 7