Is anarcho-capitalism the most retarded, self-condradictory and

>>135556703
No you're thinking of anarcho-communism.

>>135556703
>feudalism
>bad
explain?

>>135556901
The point is, anarcho-capitalism would acheive the complete opposite of what it wants. That is, if it ever came into being, which itself is impossible.

>>135556703
At least it could feasibly exist, unlike anarcho-communism

>>135556901
99% of the population lived in run down shit holes as would you

>>135557959
nah senpai
anything anarcho is by definition infeasible

File: file.png (41KB, 317x300px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 317x300px

>>135558283
They lived better than today, it's all communist propaganda.

captcha is a bit late

>>135558283
>This is what commie retards actually believe

File: 1491498910138.jpg (91KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 1280x720px

>>135556703

It seems to consist of people who are very interested in being good, logical consistency and morality who think the entire world is like them and would run best on a system that would only work for these autistic moralists. And a lot of sociopaths who just like the no rules aspect because they know they could make a killing ripping off the goody-two-shoes types described above.

It's the last safe haven before you realize most people on earth are just not like self correcting western Europeans with an internal moral compass and you have to set sail for white nationalism.

File: 1492455357040.png (29KB, 571x618px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 571x618px

>>135556703
I've noticed this meme a lot more on the internet. People aren't okay with the government oppressing and censoring people, but they're okay when a corporation does it.

Before I quit reddit, I used to see it on there all the time. "It's okay the reddit censors people, it's their website"

Why shouldn't free speech matter all the time? This mindset, is just a paved path to lead us to a future where we're ruled by corporations and have no freedoms, but it's okay, because it's corporations, not a state.

>>135557959
Anarcho-capitalism is unfeasible, if it ever came into being it would implode on itself and form a system similar to the Feudal system. That is is if ever came into being, which is impossible. How does one install an anarcho-capitalist system? You would have to overthrow the government which required a military with a hirearchy, effectively a type of Government. Lets say they decided temporarily to form a military to throw a coup. Now that they have overthrown the government, they start to dismantle it and the laws of the nation. People freak out, mass looting occures. Murder, rape and theft are everywhere, gangs start forming and extort people. Already established Mafis and groups seize this opportunity, they offer or more likly demand people to pay them a small portion of their income and obey their rules in exchange for protection. People jump at this offer in fear of there life and there families. Within weeks multiple new Governments are forming across the Nation

>>135556703
I see your pic as misguided...how exactly do I hold power over another by my private property right?

>>135556703
Yep.
Ironically it's only brokefags with no taxes to pay who want it since no intelligent and successful person is silly enough to not understand why we need taxation.

>>135560894
Do what I say or starve in the gutter.
>proceds to hire all the private militias to enforce he's "bussiness rules"

>>135559699
>Before I quit reddit, I used to see it on there all the time. "It's okay the reddit censors people, it's their website"
But that's the truth, and WHY reddit is shit. 4chan is good because its hands off, but it ought to be the owners CHOICE to leave it hands off, not the governments to compel it. you suck, and so does this shitty thread.

>>135556703
Nop that would go to anarcho statism.

>>135559699
This is pretty accurate. Who has greater control over your life? The government or your boss?

>>135558754
Rip French Army.

>>135556703
AnCap is for people who think things through, that would seemingly exclude you im afraid.

>>135562777
Nice ad hominem. How about you try counter the points i made in the thread.