Why were whites incapable of creating a culture or civilization

>>135451221
if the Nords were inferior to the meds then how come the nords destroyed the roman empire?

>>135451420
This is probably bait, but Christianity and multiculturalism destroyed Rome. The surrounding peoples just kind of came in and plundered everything.

File: IMG_0179.png (27KB, 495x106px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 495x106px

>>135451420
Same way you'd say the west is being destroyed by inferior peoples now. Military victory doesn't equal cultural superiority.

>>135451221
You retards still think this is attributed to race.

>>135451221
The middle east and the mediterranean region were inhabitated for a much longer time then the north, meaning people settled down there before the first hunters and gatherers even reached scandinavia etc. developing a civilization takes some time, and i would say we were quite successfull at it

>>135451221
>simply inferior
The fact that they have had civilization ever since contact disproves that. A better question would be why do some people lose the ability. Like the Mayans or Egyptians.

Not sure about the Egyptians, but the Mayans/Aztecs were almost completely destroyed by the conquistadors and what was left became Mexicans.

>>135451420

the idea that germans were culturally inferior as a little misleading

yes they didn't have that much writing or build great structures or have philosphy; mostly due to lack of trade or resources

but they did have cohesive tribal units, that was well aware of agriculture and metallurgy, helping them expand into the kingdom; by the time of charlemagne, germans had well copied the roman style of governance

and really the idea that germans invasions into rome destroyed it is a MYTH

rome's decline was a long series of lack of good management and the lack of cohesion among roman armies and society (because of the many ethnic groups, such as the germans themselves)

so yes they "invaded" rome but battles itself wasn't the cause of their fall

the lombards did more to "invade" rome way after the fall of the roman empire than pre-collapse tribes did

>>135451221
Greeks and romans were white you uneducated faggot

File: IMG_0176.jpg (416KB, 1491x1475px) Image search: [Google]

416KB, 1491x1475px

>>135452290
>yes they didn't have that much writing
They had no writing system prior to outside contact. Germanics were seen as nigs by the Romans.

File: IMG_0110.png (35KB, 971x597px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 971x597px

>>135452504
>Greeks and romans were white you uneducated faggot
HAHAHAHA

>>135452504
Are Greeks today considered white? Only if whites want to claim their achievements. In my opinion, they look like if a Swede and an Iraqi had a baby. Same with Italians. Although, not all Italians: some look as white as a Brit, and some look Persian.

File: IMG_0175.png (40KB, 687x736px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 687x736px

>>135452908
>inb4 muh rapebaby myth
Nordcucks think that the original Greeks and Romans were whiter and that the reason modern day Greeks and Italians are often swarthy and dark-haired is because of Turkish or Arab mixture. Of course, this has been debunked repeatedly by genetic studies and other evidence but they still hold on to it.

>>135453623
If science doesn't produce something that can help people, make a ton of money, or win wars, it's completely useless. That useless science is usually full of shitty scientists performing studies that help their own biases, like Jews trying to claim they have higher IQs. Idk about this "rapebaby myth" thing, never heard of it, all I'm saying is wogs are wogs, whites are whites.

>>135453623
Fun fact: "Greece" in Turkish is "Yunanistan".

File: non degenerate country living.jpg (316KB, 1024x684px) Image search: [Google]

316KB, 1024x684px

>>135451221
this is a more accurate germanic village from 2000 years ago.
i suggest you read into the r/K selection theory
“Man is by nature a social animal; an individual who is unsocial naturally and not accidentally is either beneath our notice or more than human. Society is something that precedes the individual. Anyone who either cannot lead the common life or is so self-sufficient as not to need to, and therefore does not partake of society, is either a beast or a god. ”
-Aristotle

File: lfezsfls.png (383KB, 603x299px) Image search: [Google]

383KB, 603x299px

>>135451221
fixed*

>>135454859
that looks quite comfy :)

File: dull witted snow nigger art.jpg (257KB, 300x632px) Image search: [Google]

257KB, 300x632px

>>135451769
(((cicero)))

>>135451221
civilization came to be in the desert and spread from there because people were forced to live in more densely populated clumps near water and food sources, whereas people in the north were more spread out and didn't need to work together as much so there wasn't as much of a need for written languages and civilized society to be created

File: neanderthal cave complex.jpg (112KB, 800x587px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 800x587px

>>135455150
actually at that exact time Spain had one of the first civilizations in Europe, look up Los millares kike.

>>135451221
Listen up civic nationalists,
1 the cause for "racial superiority" is more adverse conditions, for whites, it was harsh winters, larger hardier animals, less and more sparse edible vegetation, and worse terrain making travel more difficult. so the greater Mediterranean area was the ideal place for civilization to start, fertile land, wild cereals, generally easy terrain and mild weather made it easy to build empires. White Europeans are naturally more intelligent than all other races except east Asians. now to be far Italians score higher than average whites on IQ tests. but Italians are white, when most Americans imagine Italians we think of Sicilians, whereas most Italians look like southern french people.

File: IMG_0220.jpg (406KB, 1314x860px) Image search: [Google]

406KB, 1314x860px

>>135455640
>when whites were barbaric, it was the environment
>when other races are barbaric, it's genetic
seems legit

File: IMG_0050.jpg (73KB, 566x513px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 566x513px

>>135455266
That's about the same level as native african art

>>135455640
Racial advancedness:

0. Africans
1. Europeans
2. Western-Central Asians
3. South Asians
4. East Asians

The main groups are: blacks, whites, East Asians.

Whites being behind many other groups are dead on in between Africans and Asians, so it's not as bad as it seems.

The landscape favors Europe over other parts of the world, including China. Just look at that pristine European country side.

File: we wuz niggaz n shiet!.png (199KB, 1600x934px) Image search: [Google]

199KB, 1600x934px

>>135456279
as you can see by their noses those west Africans clearly have some ancient Caucasian ancestry, no i'm not saying we wuz africans but take a look at pic related.
also those where made in the 18th century and the celtic art was made in the first century bc.

File: quote-barbarism-is-the-natural-state-of-mankind-civilization-is-unnatural-it-is-a-whim-of-circumstance-robert-e-howard-238785.jpg (58KB, 850x400px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 850x400px

>>135451221
because whites are k selected. we don't need r selected urban centers because we have agency and are self sufficient. civilization was created by weak men that needed to rely on others to survive because they were inherently inferior. but when whites finally adopted civilization we created the greatest civilizations yet.

Mediterraneans used to be nordic. Alex Jones confirmed it in his bit about that BBC cartoon the other day.

File: c89f3425bb41a2df86bfa2f267786071--dark-skin-beauty-black-beauty.jpg (63KB, 675x900px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 675x900px

>>135451221
You answered your own question OP. It's always about the geography and more specifically when it comes to ancient civilizations the pluvial routes. It is not a coincidence that the first great civilizations formed around the Tigris/Eufrates and the Nile. Pluvial routes mean contact, contact means trade, trade means capitalism and capitalism means progress. This is also why Sub Saharan africa never flourished.

>>135451420
If shitskins are inferior, how come they're destroying the West?
>>135451749
>Christianity and multiculturalism destroyed Rome
Get off the Varg drug

File: Germany that was.jpg (4MB, 4352x4352px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 4352x4352px

>>135451221

Italian here, white Europe was civilized by us and they contributed in their own way. The collapse of the western empire sent Western Europe into the dark ages. Learn history.

Why is it that even with the help of other nations, do Africans still not understand the concept of foresight?

Their language doesnt even have a word for future

Please go to a Norwegian mountainside and try to survive a winter there without modern technology.

Let's see if you can fare better than the Scandinavians.

File: CCH1.jpg (70KB, 600x419px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 600x419px

>>135451221
also what about the Gauls, the Britons, Iberians, and Dacians?
some scholars say the Gauls had a civilization themselves, were they not white? they were described by the romans as having golden hair.

File: modern middle east blue eyed remenants.jpg (96KB, 640x413px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 640x413px

>>135451545
Mediterraneans were blue eyed as they described themselves in their sculptures.
You subhumans came from north Africa and ruined the ethnicity of the ancient Mediterranean with your ape genes setting the post-Byzantine middle east into a God forsaken shithole second to Africa.

>>135460021
Ah yes, the African language.

>>135451221
>Why were whites incapable of creating a culture or civilization of great value prior to contact

ahum??
Greeks and romans were and are europeans or what you burgers call white

File: The Lifecycle of a Civilization.jpg (209KB, 800x509px) Image search: [Google]

209KB, 800x509px

>>135451420
Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men and weak men create hard times.
They simply became weak.

File: libyan.jpg (93KB, 607x481px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 607x481px

>>135451221
>implying Mediterraneans aren't white
Being tanned does not make a person non-white.

It's also important not to confuse modern Mediterraneans (Sicilians, some Greeks, etc.) with the Mediterraneans of the ancient world. The Mediterranean region has undergone numerous invasions from North Africa and the Arab world, which in some areas resulted in mixed populations. At one point, the whole of the area surrounding the Mediterranean was populated by what could be considered white people (or had sizeable white populations), including North Africa.

>pic related is a recreation of a Libyan mural, including what resembles a European-type person

The Germanic and Scandinavian regions of Europe at this time were much less populated, and those who did live there had to deal with harsher temperatures, which made it harder for a Rome-tier civilisation to exist.

>>135456894
What's is the map supposed to be of?

>>135463037
No genetic evidence of significant mixture. Nowhere near enough to change phenotype

File: IMG_0060.jpg (269KB, 900x664px) Image search: [Google]

269KB, 900x664px

>>135460327
No written language; they didn't have much better than African kingdoms.

File: IMG_0052.jpg (57KB, 460x250px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 460x250px

>>135456894
Haplotype means little if anything. Admixture is barely above noise level. No enough to change phenotype traits like nose shape .

>>135463037
Ancient Egyptians were eastern anatolian. They're genetically similar to Armenians, even modern ones.

Are Armenians white?

>>135464655
Those digits of truth

File: armenia-armenian-girls-girl-690x431.jpg (40KB, 690x431px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 690x431px

>>135464655
Well this girl is armenian do you see non-white on her?

File: me laughing.gif (997KB, 500x332px) Image search: [Google]

997KB, 500x332px

>>135451749
>Christianity and multiculturalism destroyed Rome

Stop relying on the great pseudoscientist Varg for your history lessons, you fucking teenage jackass.

>>135451221
Meds are white, Persians can also be white, fuck off shill

The roman empire fell because nordic barbarians like varg living on welfare.
Basicallly nordcucks were the mexicans of that era.

>>135452290
*Germanics not Germans

>>135465002
Weird eyes

>>135465002
Quads and Armenians are white

>>135463104
Haplogroup R1b admixtre. i think R1b is associated with the "Aryans"

>>135465002
Lol yes. Absolutely, and this is a hand picked more white looking Amernian at that.

File: Happy-merchant.gif (13KB, 180x210px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 180x210px

>>135459525
>>135465086

I think
>>135451749
is right though. What if (((they))) know this and are getting history to repeat?

File: tumblr_m8vq6uMX6A1rubozqo1_1280.0.jpg (64KB, 660x558px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 660x558px

>>135464230
you're an idiot! clearly that is a European colony, look at the buildings. again that picture is from the 18-19th century. pic related it what the native west African buildings looked like, impressive for niggers.

>>135456149
Exculding facts that niggers still live like that and whites dont...

File: MV5BMzZiZTZkYjUtNDRlNi00N2JlLWIzODAtYWUwM2ViMDhmOGY2XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMjc5ODg5NTc@._V1_UX214_CR0,0,214,317_AL_.jpg (14KB, 214x317px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 214x317px

>>135466440
Googled around. If you're going to hand pick, do a better job. Otherwise it looks liken you have an agenda

>>135467202
It wasn't a colony you idiot, its Loango. reverse search before you say inaccurate stuff .

The nordic/germanic/celts weren't Rome tier at all. But still much more advanced than africans and other races. The germanic tribes were monogamous, had a local law that was very similiar to our own. And ostracized anyone who committed adultery, or murder. The white barbarian were the only "noble" savages in history

Meanwhile in africa and the Pacific there were poeple eating baby penis, and pissing in they're own mothers vaginas to please the worm gods.

>>135465002
Reverse image search is sketchy af. Dropped

>Empire of slaver peadophile degenerates
No thank you. I wish people would reject Romanism entirely, Romanboos are trash. Take from them what is intrinsic to the fabric of your society already, and then discard the rest.

>>135451221
Proximity to Jews.

>>135467481
clearly it was a Portuguese trading center or something, they are European buildings.

>>135466397
Except haplogroup with admixture analysis means nothing and it's only useful for tracking migrations. If you're white, you marry a girl who is 1/64 Chinese, and all your descendants keep marrying white, even 1000 years from now, they still would turn up a China haplogroup. From an admixture standpoint, it's completely meaningless, nearly none. /pol/ uses haplogroups to wewuz without really understanding genetics, it's pathetic.

>>135468160
*without admixture analysis

File: otherarmenian.jpg (13KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 480x360px

>>135467734
armenians are what ancient egyptians looked like

>checks flag
>american mongrel trying to teach others who is white

File: 1498060298867.jpg (136KB, 1030x740px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 1030x740px

>>135470177
They would have looked like modern day Levantines. i.e. almost no different than they look now.