Thread replies: 4
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
File: ay_104975897-e1362418036960.jpg (138KB, 652x887px) Image search:
[Google]
138KB, 652x887px
>As befits a culture with no word for ‘father’ or ‘husband’, Mosuo women do not marry. Instead, they take as many lovers as they wish, cherry-picking them from within the tribe and inviting them for secret evening trysts
>and there’s no stigma in not knowing who a child’s father is
>Such matriarchal utopia does have drawbacks – curious visitors have descended upon the once-isolated region under the mistaken suggestion Mosuo women offer free sex. Sadly, some of the previously peaceful villages have been overrun with hotels, casinos, karaoke and even a red-light district.
How have people ever thought matriarchies were a good thing? This proves everyone who has an issue with modern feminism correct.
>Tribalistic still and more perversely so
>Hedonistic and primitive without morals
>EASY TO TAKE OVER
How do we get people to see this obvious issue that is coalescing into a major, and obvious, problem today? They see their issues as speed bumps along the way... to what??
http://metro.co.uk/2013/03/05/where-women-rule-the-world-matriarchal-communities-from-albania-to-china-3525234/
>>
>>135332175
You don't, you just shoot it down.
>>
File: IMG_1275.jpg (51KB, 600x656px) Image search:
[Google]
51KB, 600x656px
>>135332175
>where women rule, from Albania to China
Aim for the stars.
>>
>>135335185
They have to focus on impoverished and primitive matriarchies because that's as far as they ever progress. There is no female version of the Roman empire.
Thread posts: 4
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2