If eugenics is a valid concept shouldn't people be focused

>>135236629
Yeah
What Goy said

I agree OP, all non-semitic whites should be sterilized.

File: haitimudcookie.jpg (32KB, 474x304px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 474x304px

> when the joo agrees with you
> you know it ain't right
> dis you future for your nigger kids honky

File: Explosive Authority.gif (2MB, 712x376px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 712x376px

>>135236629
It's going to be interesting to see where all this leads to in a few hundred years, by then we'll have a distinctly new breed of human in the New World.

>>135239782
I agree with this Goy too

File: cropped_reuters_KKK-800x430.jpg (133KB, 800x430px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 800x430px

>>135239378
>>135239762
>>135239782
>three responses without a single argument against my point

Yeah, thought so.

>>135236629
Eugenics are politicly incorrect.

Also go check the worldwide IQ trends.
Tge jews are trying to selectively breed retards so they could rule the world of semi-intelligent monkeys

>>135240428
What's to argue, you're correct.

>>135240600
To be fair we're not even trying.

>>135240428
They are tied together.
If you genneticly modify niggers to be smart they eont be the same niggers anymore.
Maybe they would even whiten.

>>135236629
>If eugenics is a valid concept shouldn't people be focused on objective measurements of genetic superiority
That's race.

Mixed race = inferior health
Purebred = superior health

>>135240600
Moreover Whites and namely Celtic-Germanic Whites have by far the best genetics in terms of health, intelligence, longevity and immunity suited for the European continent

File: 1495811810727.jpg (78KB, 960x727px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 960x727px

>>135236629

File: Cohencidence.jpg (253KB, 1087x1118px) Image search: [Google]

253KB, 1087x1118px

http://archive.is/rUuNn

I really hope muslims and jews are disappear one day.

>>135240428
Surely they are the bottom of the barrel, but would they murder me or my white descendants if they took over?

>>135240600
>Tge jews are trying to selectively breed retards so they could rule the world of semi-intelligent monkeys
*citation needed

>>135240914
>Mixed race = inferior health
>Purebred = superior health
*citation needed

>>135241135
By that same logic, preventing low IQ whites from breeding would transform the white race. Would you agree?

>>135241424
You are paranoid and deluded.

>>135236629
no because high iq people are one off and their decendents gradually revert to the mean of their race over time

I don't know the subject, but even a tall, high IQ dude can have shit alleles that are just recessive, and you can assume there will be more shit alleles in blacks or latinos if you think they're an inferior race.

>>135236629
>racial purity
>objective [better] qualities

Believing in either of those is retarded, and a great way to fuck up the human genome.

>>135242073
>By that same logic, preventing low IQ whites from breeding would transform the white race. Would you agree?

Yes.
Hardcore competitive capitalism with minimal safety nets would weed out the losers from society creating meritocracy with the smartest people doing the best, ok people doing ok and the biological garbage dying in the streets.

All that socialism shit sustains the losers at expense of the good guys creating active disgenics.

Actually free market is a solution to everything.
If niggers trully are geneticly inferior it will weed them out
If they arent they will live equally well.
One way or another meritocracy is a perfect solution, the people fighting for socialism are either evil or their pet losers

Anybody know the science of health in mudbloods vs pure breeds? My limited understanding of it is that too close or too distant of genes tends to produce weaker offspring. I.E. Dalmatians pure breed, small genetic pool= Weak. Rotwiler + Rotwiler or Rotwiler+ Doberman= strong, Donkey+ Horse= Muel (weak)

>>135243180
Read 'Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution' by Kropotkin

>>135242894
IF yoy actually treat people literally equally the good guys will win or the bad guys will lose.

So both racists and egalitarians should fight for a competitive capitalism.
Racists out of belief that niggers suck therefore tgey lose in competition.
Egalitarians out if belief that niggers are just as good and gonna win.
And the nature would sort them out either way.

>>135242402
*citation needed

>>135242890
This may be true, but certain bloodlines within specific races have superior genes. The "races" as we know them are huge groups of people. With that being said, why should we assume that race is a more reliable indicator of genetic superiority than measurements that indicate genetic superiority within individuals?

>>135243466
>ancap recommending kropotkin
LOL

>>135243927
I chose the first one coming to avoid showing my flag

Up in Canada, we have some great ideas.
guaranteed income supplement, you will never have your free market gas chamber.

>>135236629
>but individual variability within the races is much greater than the average differences between these groups.

That's an interesting assertion. Please show this calculation using numbers and properly sourced data. It's a mathematical claim, so it must have a mathematical basis.

File: 8b503f5603a2bad3aac4aaf5f2634690.jpg (58KB, 500x447px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 500x447px

>>135236629
>>135243625
these people get it. I'll just add that the arguments for racial homogeneity are
1. an innate instinct for in-group cohesion
2. a collective evolved subconscious that is fundamentally different between races not measurable through IQ or other low-dimensional metrics

I believe the human intellect is sophisticated enough that eugenics through meritocracy will overcome these issues, but they should not be taken lightly

>>135243927
Eugenics would require to take into account both measurements proving genetic superioty, race (if you think some races are superior) and everything that can prove genetic superiority other than race and measurements.

Instead of only keeping whites, or only keeping tall high IQ people, you keep tall whites with high IQ people, if you only consider race and these two measurements.

File: IQ_Bladk_White.jpg (37KB, 655x481px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 655x481px

>>135244230
You can clearly see in pic related that there is significant overlap, and that blacks with IQ >130 exist. In this case the difference of mean is about equal to the standard deviation, but his point still stands

>>135236629
for high IQ there are like 10000 blacks in america that would make the cut, 10% of those would be female, another 10% would be somewhat attractive. See where I'm going with this?

OP is either a beta male miscegenator or a mixed-race mongrel himself. No one who wasn't blinded by personal self-interest would ever argue in favor of the abomination of race-mixing. In fact, race-mixing should be banned on the grounds of child abuse and crimes against human decency.

File: regmean1.gif (9KB, 350x457px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 350x457px

>>135243927
>*citation needed
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jpmlqtnrec8

just google regression to the mean, there's tons of info on it

>>135244647
actually, what's interesting is the difference in standard deviation, aka the black curve is narrower than the white. I suspect the same is true for women vs men. since our genome cannot afford to fuck with the reproductive bottleneck of the species (women), the variance of male distribution will inevitably be higher, meaning more retards but also way more geniuses

>>135242073
>preventing low IQ whites from breeding would transform the white race. Would you agree?
Absolutely. I support full extermination of nonwhites and culling modern White pop by 80%
>citation needed
Lurk more, mong. If obvious baby steps on immunity system is something new to you, may as well fuck off to
>>>/r/thedonald

>>135244945
This argument makes no sense statistically, it all depends on how you group the people. It just says that any group of people will experience regression to their mean, but the inheritability (the correlation between successive generations) of IQ remains inviolate

>>135236629
Yes this is true, but if a race or culture starts looking at extinction numbers then there's no harm in wanting to preserve it by denying all other races