How Fascist are you, /pol/? I am more of Authoritarian Capit

File: 1500915499671.gif (1MB, 355x412px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 355x412px

Hey Goyim, just your local Jew here wondering why you don't acknowledge my 6 GORRILION? Imean it's only 8 SEPTILLION, what are you Goys racists??? I hope not because you can't be to accept my 13 CENTILLION. Let me know what you Goys think. Shalmo

>>135210067
Best laugh I have had yet today. Thanks, Bud. The entire Holocaust was probably no more than 2.8 Million Death.

>You are 83% Fascist, which makes you a
Bona Fide Fascist.
>Share on Facebook

File: 1500916129153.jpg (91KB, 638x732px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 638x732px

>crypto fascist
>Jew post
>common sense

>>135211149
>not ballsy enough to share ideology on fb
>feminists share their new anus piercing pictures

>>135211447
I got into a twitter argument with someone who called me a troll. She was a professional dildo reviewer.

>You are 49% Fascist, which makes you a
Fascist Fellow-Traveler.
>In your case, it would appear that your political outlook shares more than a few of the core doctrines of fascism. Since fascism is really a mix of communism, socialism, conservatism, and liberalism, with a few innovations of its own thrown in, it is scarcely surprising that most people's political outlook will have quite a few similarities with the doctrines of fascism. Even after adjusting for these parameters, however, it would seem that the commonalities between your political outlook and fascism are not merely incidental, but arise from certain overall themes, concerns, and solutions which your personal outlook has in common with fascism. While you are most likely *not* a fascist, the overlap between your preferred society and that of fascism is simply too significant to be pure chance. In all likelihood, you are what one might call a 'Fascist Fellow Traveler': Someone who sees value in some of the immediate societal changes that fascism would bring about, but *not* someone who is an actual fascist. Your ultimate political goal lies elsewhere.

That does seem about right, if not awfully vague. I suppose I am glad you higher percentiles exist.

File: fullsizeoutput_156.jpg (1MB, 2810x4096px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2810x4096px

>>135211766

>>135209665
68%er