"Religious Freedom" my ass. Why can't Mormons have multiple wives?
Not a Mormon BTW.
>>135183850
Multiple wives is degenerate and leads to societal problems.
I wouldn't want to have multiple wives
they would constantly be bitching at eachother
>>135183850
The government wouldn't let Utah become a state if they didn't stop polygamy.
>>135184092
>I wouldn't want to have multiple wives
>they would constantly be bitching at me
FIFY
>>135183850
Some men, even non-momons, practice polygamy in secret. One could even argue that by common law, a man who cohabits a household with multiple females is in a marriage or not with them.
Having multiple wives is not bad for social cohesion, albeit it makes an unequal pairing of men to women, but that it proves a better alternative to the culture that presented to us now.
>>135183850
>Why can't Mormons have multiple wives?
Because they are white males. They just want to brag with their ability to feed giant family when poc men can't deal with one. They should spend more time checking their privilege than earning money for their white bitches.
>>135184910
I just find it hypocritical that a govt that prides itself with "religious liberty" tells a religious group what they can and cannot do.
>>135183850
I just remembered about that town in Texas that was constructed by scratch (it included a small castle), in which everyone was white and polygamous. Although it was more fucked up as the men would also have sex with men in order to be one with one another, so basically, one huge orgy.
>>135183850
OK Mr.dumb
The reason multiple wives are not allowed in the contemporary west, is because each imported wife is entitled to child support and multiple wives becomes a for profit venture, your country will be flooded with ninjas and their soon-to-be onshore offspring sponsored by Muslims that hold PR in your country.
>>135183989
It was the norm during Biblical times. Humans aren't meant to be monogamous.
>>135183850
Because betas made it illegal.
>>135187555
>aren't meant
Who meaning are we following?
>>135187555
>It was the norm during Biblical times
no
>>135188786
Did you read the Old Testament?