Is having gay people in our culture highlighting the inherent

>>135135387
who dat

>>135135387
Gay people were always around. Society used to care about keeping itself healthy, and promoting gay lifestyle is contrary to that so they were oppressed.

Everytime you see that stars and stripes flag you know what you're about to read will have you question how anybody can be this stupid.

>>135135703
Pedophiles have also always been around but we reject and shun them, is that American society's virtue signalling?

>>135135821
Thanks for the bump

I don't see homosexuality and hedonism being interchangable terms - I mean, yes, the mainstream gay culture is hedonistic, but there are lots, I mean a silent majority who reject the loud flamboyant hedonistic side of homosexuality.

>>135135987
Pretty much this. Also helps that the silent majority mostly shun the shitters that are the flamboyant faggots.

>>135135987
I actually agree with you, but the flamboyant culture is a genuine problem, because that's what the rest of the world sees, and it's pretty disgusting

>>135135387
>the inherent hedonism of global capitalism
No. You can have capitalism, even global capitalism, without liberal degeneracy. Fags and trannies, and liberalism in general, represents the corrupt and diseased condition of the human race.

Look at all of the fruits that liberalism bear:
>fags
>fag sex and nudity in the streets ("pride" parades)
>trannies
>immorality
>hatred for all morality, religions, and traditions, under the guise of "tolerance"
>violent thugs, anarchists, and domestic terrorists
>drug abuse, alcoholism

On another note, look at the most worthless person you know. The loser who dropped out of high school, has a million tattoos and a criminal record, and does drugs all day. He probably votes liberal. Irresponsible single mom with a million kids from different fathers? Liberal. Nigger? Liberal.

>>135136387
How do you explain niggers who vote conservative?

>>135136387
Capitalism will always have 2 sides but the sides effect eachother, one zigs the other zags, that's how it's always been.
But if one side can point out why the other is wrong using only logic and telling them why it negatively effects both groups, the other might change. If conservatives started treating lgbtq stuff with a solemn concern instead of rabid, unintelligible hate, they would get through the the smart liberals (they do exist) and the smart liberals effect the dumb ones, same as the smart conservatives effect the dumb ones.

>>135136827
Are rainbows just shitposting 24/7?

File: IMG_0314.jpg (93KB, 700x700px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 700x700px

>>135135387
I've come to this conclusion. Which is why I now support National Socialism.

Makeup companies now trying to sell makeup to boys, in order to double their market share. They claim they support LGBTQ rights, but really they're just trying to make more money.

>>135137190
Natsoc is the only true way

>>135137097
Pretty much, you can't really silence us fags with slurs unlike niggers.