Attention Styx, you are wrong about the constitutionality of

File: 1 Styx cuck and trapper.jpg (59KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 900x900px

I cringe everytime he says 13A instead of 14A. Here is a real analysis of the transgender military ban as this will get shot down in trial courts and will never reach the Supreme Court

Under the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution Equal Protection Clause, the standard of review for a law that discriminates against sexual orientation is rational basis or intermediate scrutiny. However, its arguable that Transgenderism is not a "sexual orientation" as gender dysphoria is classified as a mental disorder by the DSM IV. As a side note, laws discriminating against disabled people is subject only to rational basis

Rational basis review is the minimum standard a law must pass to be constitutional. This means that the law is rationally related to a legitimate governmental interest in fact or hypothetically. The burden would be on the transgender plaintiffs to prove the law is arbitrary, irrational, or capricious.

Here, excluding transgenders is rationally related to the governmental interest of saving military costs associated with fielding such service members. These costs would include medical for hormones and transition surgery, sensitivity training, and insurance. Because the law meets rational basis review, it is constitutional and the burden is on the plaintiff to prove otherwise.