"Sex and Gender and two different things"
How to argue against this point?
The modern definition of gender was defined by John Money, a psychologist who sexually abused a boy who was neutered by a botched circumcision, along with his twin brother. This was done for the sake of his gender research. Use it well.
>>135007589
"No they're not" then do a 360 and walk away
>>135007589
Well, it is not. Gender is a made up term, there's only sex
>>135007589
well you are very fake news
Just ask "What is gender then?"
90% of these shit sticks will just say something like "it's whatever I want it to be"
In which case that's the end of the argument. No definition means it's literally nothing.
Sex is something. Gender is nothing.
>>135007589
Gender roles are primarily based on innate behavioral traits generally distributed between the two sexes. Some societies may be more or less strict on adherence to those roles, but innate behaviors are the primary driver of gender roles.
Things like what the sexes wear can be described as culturally relative, but the notion that, in general, there are no innate behavioral differences is to deny science.
>>135007589
Gender and sex were synonymous before (((someone))) decided to change the definitions.