You don't own your tax debts, your straw man persona does.

>>134809870
>blue collar crimes on left
>white collar crimes on right
that's really about it, op.

>>134809870
No.

File: Good LOTR reaction.jpg (39KB, 492x388px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 492x388px

>>134809870
>sovcit

File: IMG_0957.gif (2MB, 300x249px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 300x249px

>>134809870
But anon, I'm not ready to go up against the entire might of the Federal government and the vicious IRS. Not today NSA.

Sovereign Citizens are so far down their own rabbit hole of delusion that it's almost amusing. Despite having a 0% success rate, people keep clinging to it.

>>134812532
wat? Pls explain pls.

>>134812658
people think they can get out of paying taxes through some legal mumbo jumbo, as if the government would accept any excuse they could give to not pay tax.

>>134809870
Civil law is better than degenerate commoners' law though. But yeah. If you want to go asking for 300K from your birth certificate and end up on social security like Ayn Rand then go ahead nobody cares. All money is interest so let's pay for your capitis deminutio. A civil law concept. Free men is a spin off on communist commoners' law. If you have a beev with civil law take it elsewhere. The citizen in civil law can make arguments and collect evidence and is not compelled to disclose. Judges should question and not be lawyers. Nothing is new under the sun. No lie detectors but lemme see your eyes. We know who are whores just by looking at them. If you smoke weed you are unreliable. Computer executed issues as hear say etc etc. But muh right to innocence I dont even have reeee. If you get busted for "minor" things in civil law. You can't lie like in communist law too well. Judge might gib leniency based on your age maybe? Here we throw you in the garbage with ageism of many forms. And if not? There's many appeals and no stupid idiot jurors to judge you. There is no "affluenza" defence in civil law. Nor a Twinkie defence. Absolute bullshit like this

The "sovereign citizens getting owned" jewtube videos are great.

>>134814065
I dont like cringeyness. I dont agree with them. They are correct you know. It's that it implies all sorts of things and some governments and therefore judges see them as even maybe terrorist anarchists or whatever. They know people might try now. This is all a problem of common law but nobody cares