Thread replies: 14
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
File: 1500792739602.jpg (86KB, 736x736px) Image search:
[Google]
86KB, 736x736px
Why not sexually assault the progressives? They do not look like they would have the physical strength to be able to defend themselves, nor they do not possess firearms because of their disagreement with the Second Amendment. Furthermore, many of them are white males. They are legitimate targets, and their fellow progressives would not care if they are assaulted, as they have too much privilege. They may be too humiliated to even report it at all. It should be a relatively risk-free exercise.
It does not sound like it would be difficult to form groups of two to four people, sufficient to overpower and sexually assault a single progressive.
>>
>>134625624
Yeah, but why?
>>
>>134625624
This is gay.
>>
Because sexuality assaulting someone is top nigger tier shit
>>
very gay, why not just beat them up
>>
Ok mr. FBI
>>
>>134627653
Since i've just learned what a Hegelian triad is i propose the synthesis of beating them up with our dicks
>>
I feel like it's fair to confront m to f trannies in a competition over resources.
>>
>>134625624
>not paying or drugging niggers to do it for you
>>
>Why not sexually assault the progressives?
Because we're not the middle east
>>
File: a26e9d4da53bd054bd1dfa43d78a8ec2.png (588KB, 620x900px) Image search:
[Google]
588KB, 620x900px
>>134625624
Bugger girly boi liberals?
Fabulous.
>>
Gay Poland.
Very gay.
>>
>grab them: mike pence's kung lao fedora hat edition
>>
>>134625624
>why not stoop down to the lowest of the low
>fuck morals and principles, freedom and justice
>sponsored by Goldman and Silverstein TM
Thread posts: 14
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2