>mfw /pol/ believes eugenics is morally acceptable

>>134590344
Why is it not ethical

>>134590344
The default system is dysgenic. We need eugenics or else mankind will turn into a horde of drooling retards like yourself.

>>134590413

because treating other people like some form of cattle is not cool man.

Uhhhh have you heard about the nazis and what they did to the jews?

>>134590598
who gave you the right to tell other people who they can or who they can't make love to? Dude listen love is for EVERYBODY you freaking nazi

File: gfsgfdsgfd.jpg (11KB, 197x200px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 197x200px

>>134590344
>it's a '/pol/ is a monolith episode'

Morals are the reason science is being held back.
If all parties consent and a waiver is signed, human experimentation should be legal.

>>134590800
too open for abuse/fraud

>>134590786
the majority of /pol/ seem to have matched satire with seriousness

They only agree when it's happening to non-whites but when other groups say it about them then it becomes taboo. Hypocrites at it's finest, but these are the retards who still support Trump even though he's an obvious shill for the Globalists.

>>134590610
>What is voluntary eugenics for 200 Alex?

File: skullface jullian come on.png (221KB, 635x457px) Image search: [Google]

221KB, 635x457px

>>134590344
>mfw normalfags believe dysgenics is morally acceptable.

>>134590344
>wtf man eugenics is fucked up

He says as a crazed half breed neo-brazilian shoves a sharp blade into his spine

>>134591200
like who wants to voluntarily sterilize himself? get a grip man things like that can only be done with force

Modern science would be so much further head if they were not held back by genetic realism.

>>134590344

Eugenics is a necessity to avoid a Malthusian catastrophe.

World IQ is decreasing while population numbers rocket up. Average IQ in Western nations is now dropping, as is GDP per capita.

When this surge of cheap oil ends the global economy is going to fucking implode.

>>134590344
>implying it isn't
Stupid people shouldn't be allowed to breed. People who are socio-economically disadvantaged should not be allowed to breed either.

>>134590610
>have you heard about the Nazis and what they did to the Jews?
Ah, you're new here I see.

retards in western countries still promote eugenics but wont have babys yet complain about niggers and shitbois having lots of babies and having populations which cant be wiped out

>>134590344

Have you lived around niggers?

Eugenics is totally appropriate.

it's either
>regulate who mantains the population
or
>let shitniggers breed like rabbits and leave everything ruined

even my mother as commie as she is approves eugenics

>>134591435

Offer idiots money and you would be surprised what they do for it.

>pirate
>caring about morals
think about the upsides OP. No more people will be born with deformities or mental deficiencies. Do you think downs actually enjoy their lives?

>>134591435
>implying eugenics must involve sterilization

File: 1443420317777.jpg (31KB, 352x350px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 352x350px

>In 1921, Sanger founded the American Birth Control League, which later became the Planned Parenthood Federation of America. In New York City, she organized the first birth control clinic staffed by all-female doctors, as well as a clinic in Harlem with an all African-American advisory council,[10] where African-American staff were later added.[11] In 1929, she formed the National Committee on Federal Legislation for Birth Control, which served as the focal point of her lobbying efforts to legalize contraception in the United States. From 1952 to 1959, Sanger served as president of the International Planned Parenthood Federation. She died in 1966, and is widely regarded as a founder of the modern birth control movement.[3]

>After World War I, Sanger increasingly appealed to the societal need to limit births by those least able to afford children. The affluent and educated already limited their child-bearing, while the poor and ignorant lacked access to contraception and information about birth-control.[111] Here she found an area of overlap with eugenicists.[111] She believed that they both sought to "assist the race toward the elimination of the unfit." They differed in that "eugenists imply or insist that a woman's first duty is to the state; we contend that her duty to herself is her duty to the state."[112] Sanger was a proponent of negative eugenics, which aimed to improve human hereditary traits through social intervention by reducing the reproduction of those who were considered unfit.[113]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Sanger

>mfw liberals think they don't support eugenics as well

>>134590344
If an individual pays for it themselves and it's entirely voluntary what is wrong with it?

File: 1496077156524.gif (391KB, 1019x694px) Image search: [Google]

391KB, 1019x694px

>>134590610
>b-but Nazis did it!

haha none of you retards can reply to my comment because i destroyed eugenics as useless ideas promoted by jew controlled nazis

why dont you all start having babies and you wont get swarmed by niggers and spics whatever you call them