So /pol/ is not very fond of Jews when it comes to politics and

File: jews_control_america.jpg (34KB, 425x240px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 425x240px

death to israel

thats not how racism works

File: 1451005370241.jpg (526KB, 967x729px) Image search: [Google]

526KB, 967x729px

>>134557829
>>134557829


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E8iL1wHfw-I

Richard Feynman was cool

File: jewish physics.png (197KB, 637x714px) Image search: [Google]

197KB, 637x714px

>>134557829
Fixed it.

File: judaism intensifies.gif (212KB, 501x585px) Image search: [Google]

212KB, 501x585px

>>134558421
kek

>>134558291
E = mc^2

http://www.strawpoll.me/13505064

>>134558291
Didn't he originally work at a patent office as well?

>>134558291
>what is Brownian motion
>what is general relativity
>what is the photoelectric effect

>>134557829
Inventions are inventions, they can be used for good and bad, physics and calculus is just the same

That said both Einstein and Newton (was he jewish though?) were complete wacko degenerates. Newton was basically /r9k/ in the pre internet days.

>>134558802
That formula and principle was known before Einstein.

>>134560561
stole this from the tubes

Poincaré was confused on several points. (See the discussion on Wikipedia regarding "mass energy equivalence".) He could never get the mechanical relations straight since he could not figure out that E=mc2E=mc2. Einstein followed Poincaré closely in 1905, he was aware of Poincaré's work, but he derived the theory simply as a geometric symmetry and made a complete system.

Einstein did share the credit with Lorentz and Poincaré for special relativity for a while, probably one reason his Nobel prize did not mention relativity. Pauli in the Encyclopædia Britannica article famously credits Einstein alone for formulating the relativity principle, as did Lorentz. Poincaré was less accommodating. He would say "Einstein just assumed that which we were all trying to prove" (namely the principle of relativity). (I could not find a reference for this, and I might be misquoting. It is important because it shows whether Poincaré was still trying to get relativity from Maxwell's equations, rather than making a new postulate—I don't know.)

Special relativity was ripe for discovery in 1905, and Einstein wasn't the only one who could have done it, although he did do it best, and only he got the E=mc^2 without which nothing makes sense. Poincaré and Lorentz deserve at least 50% of the credit (as Einstein himself accepted), and Poincaré has most of the modern theory, so Einstein's sole completely original contribution is E=mc^2

>>134557829
both Einstein and Newton would have the same answer to this unless that portal would travel at the speeds nearing the speed of light

>>134560535
Fun fact: The correct field equations of the General Theory were published before Einstein finally got them right.

The answer is A.
If the cube was moving upwards towards the portal, then it would be B.

t INTP

>>134557986
You're not a faggot

>>134557829
Portals can't move.

>>134563328
>Earth moves
>Portals can be used on Earth
Retarded burger.

>>134560765
This

Bet most of /pol/ can't even drive without GPS so you guys have no room to complain about (((relativity)))

>>134557829
>Energy can magically transfer from one object to the other

Even ((((EIN))))Stein didn't believe that cmon lad

>>134557829
The itself cube has no momentum, ergo the result is A.

t. Somebody who actually played the fucking game.

>>134562517
Beat me to it

Jewish Physics is dead-end. Start over.

>>134557829
https://youtu.be/UjKBoN2tRWw
Tested this in portal

>>134557829
>>134558291
So Einstein did come up with the equation for four-momentum, E^2=m^2c^4+p^2c^2 (or E=mc^2 when at rest, momentum p=0), and he did come up with the idea that space and time were relative, but he did not develop much of the math surrounding it. There's a reason they're called "Lorentz Transformations" and not "Einstein Transformations". Einstein did amazing work as a physicist in Brownian motion and the photoelectric effect, not to mention later general relativity, but... well, to paraphrase his math professor, Minkowski (see Minkowski spacetime), Einstein was never a very good mathematician. Minkowski would later modify this criticism, saying he may not be a good mathematician, but he was a good physicist. That's why it took Minkowski, Lorentz, and others to realize Einstein's special Relativity was really just a rotation in four-dimensions.

Source: been studying physics for the past 6 years

>>134564246
I did the experiment in game. There's no right answer in that picture.

The answer to that question is the second one, because in the game she says that momentum is convserved through the portal and P=MV and velocity is relative between the object and the portal.

File: 6546464.jpg (75KB, 850x400px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 850x400px

>>134557829

And INFP ? Did there INFP physicist ?

>>134557829
How can you compare Newton with Einstein. Newton is once-a-thousand-years breakthrough. Newton is god tier. Einstein is great, but not above his peers. The quantum mechanics guys were more mind blowing, but that's not what plebs understand

Newton and Darwin will always be 100x as important as Jewish scientists like Einstein. Jews know this that's why they used their Mindrape media complex to shill for Einstein and e=mc2 because they want a Jew to get credit. Einstein admitted tesla was better than him

But why would it fly through said portal if the only thing the cube has to do is think about air resistance. Its not touching anything the whole time.

File: arabs.jpg (93KB, 850x400px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 850x400px

>>134565363
I knew Einstein was a Jew and his contributions are heavily overblown. I often wonder if he had much of a hand in this or if it was mostly international Jewry using him to push their agenda, or somewhere in between.

He seems to go against their agenda relatively often.