>Despite all evidence to the contrary, government scienti

You just realized Global Warming was a marketing ploy now?

You'd think the UNIVERSAL consensus on a non-reproducible phenomenon would suggest the presence of an echo chamber.

We need to purge the scientists.

Climate change exists, just not for the reasons you believe. It's slightly more likely it's caused by the procession of the equinoxes, leading to stages where summer and winter both happen later, seem longer and are more extreme. This gives anthropological climate change scientists data to prove that yes, the earth is heating up but if it's also cooling down then it could only be partially anthropological at best and that's assuming co2 is a factor here.

>>134362319
Maybe to create a carbon tax or get humans to taste nuclear energy. What do you think happens to industry when electricity is a tenth the price?

Global warming leads to a the ocean losing salinity, this causes the gulf stream to loop at a lower latitude, this causes an ice age.

>>134363402
The question has always been AGW, but with the issue seemingly intentionally distorted.

>>134363091
Alt-right intellectuals, everyone

File: 1482344758060.jpg (212KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]

212KB, 1080x1080px

>>134364174
Fuck off Merkel.

>>134364155
It's a science culture thing, if it's not agw then so what and they simply wasted their time, if it is agw then they've already prepared and taken steps. The idea here is you'd rather prepare for a plausible disaster than gamble on if it happens or not.

BTW I think we can use this to push nuclear power and get humanity to the next stage. If we can agree it's just an idea then we can abuse it too.

>>134364387
>when I read that as my name and thought for a moment 4chan is done with my greenie shit

>>134361712
>>134362319
>this myth again

Why don't the deniers know how to read?

https://www.dmi.dk/en/groenland/maalinger/greenland-ice-sheet-surface-mass-budget/

Here is the source of the chart in the OP pic, from the DMI

It says

>The calving loss is greater than the gain from surface mass balance, and Greenland is losing mass at about 200 Gt/yr.
>If climate changes, the surface mass balance may change such that it no longer matches the calving and the ice sheet can start to gain or lose mass. This is important to keep track of, since such a mass loss will lead to global sea level rise. As mentioned, satellites measuring the ice sheet mass have observed a loss of around 200 Gt/year over the last decade.

So the fucking source you have posted disagrees with this idiotic assertion that Greenland is gaining ice.

File: circular_reasoning.gif (8KB, 642x555px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 642x555px

>>134361712

Pardon me sir but Wikipedia at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_authority clearly states that we have to trust scientists on whatever they say. THEY are the authorities, YOU are not.