>Get accused of having "white privilege" >"Excuse

"White privilege" refers to advantages gained through institutionalized racism (ex: getting better access to home loans over minorities) and does not infer genetic superiority. Your heart is in the right place but any liberal with half a functioning brain cell will win this argument.

White privilege cuz negros don't pay their bills

>>134312358
>any liberal with half a functioning brain cell will win this argument

Looks like your right op, they can't win this argument.

>>134312358
>implying genetic superiority is the only type of superiority

>>134312358
The OP is retarded, but there is no institution that is racist.
Why can't blacks get home loans as often?
On a macro level, What tends to be their income and credit score?
If you said "little to none" and "very poor" respectively, then you are correct.
Everything libs claim to be some kind of ethereal racism or magical institutions that discriminate generally can be explained by statistics they ignore.

>>134312358
>getting better access to home loans over minorities

sounds like they are superior then

>>134312091
thats really not as smart as you think it is my friend.
just answer accusations of white privilege an racism with "so what?" thats really all you need to do

>>134312358

Considering the more extreme forms of liberalism may very well be the result of either a damaged or diseased brain...

Always implying liberals know how to argue classically and just don't scream out a bunch of complex questions, ad hominems, and other fallacies etc...

>>134312358
>liberal with half a functioning brain
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

>>134312091
>"Excuse me ma'am, are you implying white people are superior?"
>"Of course not, white people just stole everything and profited off POC's work"

You've obviously never argued with a liberal

>>134312679
I don't buy into the concept, I'm just explaining the terms. A liberal would almost certainly claim credit agencies disenfranchise minorities, although you right in that they statistically aren't as good at paying their debts as whites.

>>134312358
All privileges are advantages but not all advantages are privileges. For group privileges is required
>sovereign or contract grantor
>all group members afforded privilege
>no non-group members afforded privilege
>enforcement mechanism to afford members and deny non-members

Example of real group privileges: adult privilege to drive and buy alcohol

>>134312826
Platitudes tend to be all I hear out of their mouths.
Completely meaningless statements which are followed up by no representative statistics that only prove what the statistic was studied for or have no actual link to the proposed idea of privilege/oppression or whatever.

>>134312358
Yeah and how did whites institutionalise their superiority?

Could it be genetic superiority?

Black people are bigger and stronger but white people enslaved them for hundreds of years because they developed the means to overpower them.

>>134312978
Or they simply may not have credit either which is also very common.
Marxist Critical Theory and Intersectionalism have been the two most damaging ideologies in acedemia since the end of WW2.
They are directly responsible for the negative sentiments we see today towards family, Christianity, and Capitalism.

Those ideas are also not concerned with reality, they start with a frame before even asking why and pull statistics to fit the mold. When a statistic explains away the point of the mold, they bury it.

The "gender pay-gap" for example, it is easily explained away by real factors and studies, but we continue to see it taught in universities because to Intersectionalism, the gap can only be explained as "sexism", it's intellectually dishonest.

>>134313147
The world's strong men are all European Caucasian or Slavic.

>>134312358
It's a cargo cult concept. If they were honest, they'd call it "non-black advantages".

>>134312679
Another thing their "blame whitey" ethos causes them to ignore: Chinese have parity or better with whites in every metric.

>>134312358
>and does not infer genetic superiority.
If whites weren't genetically superior, how could they gain this edge over everyone else? Don't you believe in evolution?

If whites have privilege, then what to they do about Oprah and Obama or some Chinese guy usurping it or a white homeless guy not being afforded it. If you see a 12 year old driving or 17 year old buying alcohol, you can call the cops and stop them enjoying adult privileges. If you're 18, you can't be denied a driver licence when otherwise qualified because you now have the (real, enforceable) group privilege.

pretend to be a jew, a gay one if push comes to shove and you can never lose the argument

>>134313456
>>134312978
The studies that show these prejudices all compare people on equal footing. For an equal credit history and income, black people will get worse rates on mortgages. Same thing with jobs. A study put in identical resumes with a white name and a black name. The white name got called back at a much higher rate. Lots of examples like this.

>>134316452
Of course the white name got called back more, that black name signifies crime and retardation.

File: IMG_20170720_100444.jpg (232KB, 659x1500px) Image search: [Google]

232KB, 659x1500px

>>134312358
There's something here still. Liberals are implying that no matter what whites do, the fate of minorities are in their hands. They are, ironically, the most outspoken when it comes to white supremacy.

>>134312358
For better access to loans and such, there is no need for institutionalised racism, just close friendship with the Jew.

>>134316452
>doesn't bother comparing groups with higher IQ and lower time preference like Orientals
>calls it "white" rather than "non-black"

>>134316452
If would be career-ending for any social scientist to propose doing these tests comparing Chinese people to blacks.

>>134316452
You just have to look at the trend, blacks are simply less successful in general.

If we're going to look at intelligence and success coefficient. Intelligent people tend to succeed, it's a strong correlation.
Africans and African Americans on a macro level are on the bottom totem as intelligence is concerned and we see that they end up exactly where predicted most of the time.

>>134312358
But it doesn't exist. It's literally a tool to eliminate white people, which isn't working btw

>>134324139
>have an advantage
>this somehow means you are being eliminated

???