A degree in political science should be required to vote >prove

>>134286832
>"Today's lesson class?"
>"My political opinions, and why you should believe like me, if you want to pass."
>*note my political opinions being authoritarian right is about as likely as winning the lottery.
>getting even a libertarian is akin to seeing an albino deer in the marxist/progressive wildlands
>*note I will, even if it's subconciously, fuck you over if you disagree with me.

>>134287272
alright then fair enough

>>134286832
A single vote per family would fix a lot of it. Restricting it further to house owning families would work too but in some places it's simply not possible. Restricting voting to white house owning men would be best though.

>>134287272
/thread

>>134287272
Political science is not as corrupted as sociology. I did it in addition to my law degree and it was mostly civics, history and realist geopolitics. That said, it's getting worse but most SJWs are put off by how white and male that area still is.

You should need to do some course in civics thought. So annoying when people can't even grasp the difference between state and federal law let alone the separation of powers...

File: oldonnow.png (75KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 500x500px

>>134286832

So engineers, doctors, teachers, executives, journalists, writers, artists, builders, soldiers, nurses, technicians, inventors and farmers shouldn't have a right to vote?

That is shoe-on-head retarded.

>>134287272
this
a friend of mine studies political science and economics. He says the professors don't even have to be cucked liberals, they might even be pretty alright lads, but they just don't teach certain stuff in their courses.
He redpilled himself (in economic terms; he's pretty much a normie otherwise) trough youtube and books and when he brings something up the profs nod knowingly but basically don't reply, while the rest of the class don't know what's going on

>>134290384
i'm a scientist (if you consider molecular biology a science) and i agree. Most scientist i know are cucked liberals. Maybe it's just the life sciences, but i know a few mathematicians, chemists and physicists and the same applies for them

>>134286832
What a fucking retarded idea, colleges today are run by liberals, if this becomes a criteria, colleges will only admit and pass liberal students, they will do background checks and make sure the student is a fucking liberal before they accept them. And if you plan on pretending you're a commie, trust me, liberal political science is hell

>>134286832
>((degree))

what has this place done to me

>>134286832
At least one whole year in full time employment should be required to be allowed to vote.
That would coincidentally caused that all political science majors, socialists and Sanders supporters would be banned from voting.
It would immediately improve the country.

Don't bother proving me wrong, I know it, you know it, just let it go.

File: ana1463147044969.gif (1MB, 300x311px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 300x311px

>>134286832
>voting requirement - political sciences degree with much postmodernism classes
>people who actually study something useful as for instance biologie, engeneering and whatnot can't vote
>entrepreneurs you know the guys who create te fucking jobs and whatnot, can't vote

yeah that's sounds like a plan to destroy a country or economy in the fastest way possible

>>134290663
You expect scientists to being able to change their minds in front of hard facts

File: 1277290325125.jpg (46KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 640x360px

>>134286832

only jew brainwashed academia produce should be allowed to vote

why not step over yourself and just remove the vote altogether but for the god's chosen ?

>>134286832
Not in today's world. Colleges are borderline useless and the people that come out of them are no better than your average trade-school worker.

What can I do with my Master of Public Administration? Just kys?

>>134290997
you would, yes. But it's a very strange thing hearing people from the natural sciences talk politics. First, none of them takes the humanities serious "it's not real science" therefore any sociological, economic... argument can be easily dismissed by that statement and replaced by feels. Second, the biological redpills are SO incredibly tabu, you wouldn't believe it. I haven't dared yet mention anything race related amongst my peers; i don't want to lose my job. I only once mentioned a nature paper, were a possible biological link to pacific islanderst hightened agression was found and only got some mildly interested looks.
Heck, not even our own field of expertiese if free from "feels before reals". It's pretty much a shark tank, but the scientific process atleast enables us to overcome this innate human nature eventually.

>>134290384
>journalist
We should do more than not let them vote.

No, it shouldn't, but you're on the right track.
People who work in education should vote for education representatives in government and public transport organizers / workers should vote for their representative in government etc etc etc. If you're on a ship who should vote, the passengers or the crew?

>t. guy who read some aristotle and oswald mosley

>>134291566
This. The vast majority of journalism today is pure jewish propaganda and celebrity gossip. Leeches and parasites.

>>134286832
Great so now only people who work at Arby's can vote now.

File: got dang ol BOOMhauer.jpg (91KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 1000x1000px

>>134286832
Actually, the way things were originally set up was optimal.
You had to be a business or property owner. This is important because owning land/a business requires planning, responsibility, and shows that a person generally(there are exceptions) has the ability to understand actions-consequences, which is vital for educated voting.

Women and the youth were forbidden from voting for the simple fact that, as demographics, they lack future awareness.
They're unable to see how doing A can lead to B down the line.
If you're unable to see how your actions might affect society 1-100 years down the road, you've no business voting.

>>134286832
>A jewish funded liberal-leaning indoctrining 'degree' is required to vote.

That isn't democracy. That just turns your country into an esoteric oligarchial-hegemony. Voting only becomes possible for the wealthy, or people willing to enslave themselves with debt. This would eventually create an obstinate caste system.

Stop pretending you have any interesting political opinions or idea's. Because you're obviously a fucking moron. Just proved you wrong.

Political Science degrees are fucking useless, I only got one because it was free through the military and I incorrectly believed I would be able to apply to OCS upon completion. I now work as a body guard for absolute cunts and sleep with strippers. I come from a family of doctors and lawyers.

>>134292291
Get a Master in International Relationship.
Also, learn new languages there's more work than you think for polsci

>>134286832
> Getting a worthless degree
> Being a dumb cunt

>>134292291
I blame others for being a retard too.

>>134286832
>paying thousands of pounds in order to vote

Fucking povvo plebs don't deserve it

File: 1499404020991.jpg (140KB, 503x1012px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 503x1012px

>>134286832
nahh... Meme degrees and in fact any degree required to vote is a bad idea. This degrees would be even more useless, shallow and full of propaganda.

I know a guy whos degree was all about european union, even though he knows alot about EU he still thinks it's a great political body and should have more power. For 5 years he was subjected to propaganda of best Korea quality, which makes him blind to any argument. Every point i make he disregard and blames it on "internal problems of nation X, which has nothing to do with EU".

the only way to "fix" dememecracy:

>1 vote per family, if you do not have a wife and at least 1 child you can't vote.
>if you are unemployed you can't vote.
>if you work at any public offices you shouldn't be able to vote (cuz of bias).
>?

>>134292137
Kikes should not be allowed to vote too then, they can't make good decisions that will have a positive impact to the future.
We all know kikes can only think about how to get more money immediately, and that's why they ruined the economy of nations countless times. They're dangerous given any sort of power.

>>134286832
Voting Is stupid and isn't part of a useful country