HUGE BREAKING: Hillary Framed Trump on Russia (NATIONAL ENQUIRER

File: 1452542602732.jpg (443KB, 1550x1600px) Image search: [Google]

443KB, 1550x1600px

>>134234849
>the national enquirer
Isn't that a fucking joke magazine?

>>134234950
They broke several big stories including the Edwards love child story that scooped the whole MSM. But I know you've got to do your job and shill... No sweat buddy...

>>134234950
Not as much of a joke as CNN

File: 786876876.jpg (93KB, 414x508px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 414x508px

>>134235309
I'm not a shill you imbecile, most of the shit they put in that thing is a joke.

>>134235655
It's all good. We both have bills to pay.

I always laugh when I see the headlines on this newspaper in the check out line at the super market

>>134234950

They've broken the stories on several politicians' sex scandals.

>>134235655
And this is all shit that broke on /pol/ last week.

>>134235812
to be fair, it is a celebrity gossip magazine I don't think its out of the question to question its legitimacy.

>>134234950
They definitely used to be. In the 80s and 90s it was flat out laughably bad fake news about Bat Boy and Princess Di drama. But as I was standing in the checkout line at the grocery store the other day I realized that modern 24 hour news stations are borderline National Enquirer level journalists. And internet news sites are fucking Weekly World News tier.

>>134235988
Daily Mail and National Enquirer are the two first big name publications on the story. Forbes talked about Hillary campaign involvement but this goes much further.

are national enquirer /ourguys/???????? tabloids seem based, all of the 'crazy shit' theyve reported has turned out to be true

If I dont see the story on CNN then I will not believe it. Also noone will do anything if CNN isnt talking about it!!

File: 1497028243270.jpg (62KB, 320x371px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 320x371px

>>134235812
Oh yes, because I so happen to think differently I am automatically someone who gets paid to spread propaganda.You're such a fucking genius, you've got it figured all out don't ya?Fuck you people are retarded.

>>134235655
There's a Jim Beam in a can?

>>134235923
They just throw darts at a board hoping one is a bullseye. Kind of like /pol/.

>>134234849
(((NATIONAL ENQUIRER)))

File: 187687678687.png (361KB, 411x757px) Image search: [Google]

361KB, 411x757px

>>134236514
Yes

>>134236514
https://www.gardengrocer.com/products/index/1/5680-jim-beam-cola-premixed-can-6pk-355ml-cans-id-required

premix jim beam and coke

>>134236541

The funny thing is that meme magic is actually strong and somewhat works.

File: 1498282794438.jpg (50KB, 960x516px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 960x516px

>>134235655
NOT A SHILL? OK BUDDY, WANNA HANGOUT? WE COULD GO TO THE MOVIES, I'D EVEN LET YOU HAVE SOME OF MY POPCORN!

>>134236280
What I'm trying to get across is that this story is true as Cambodian rice farming forum found it out last week

>>134236407
I know your stock responses and the Pepes you use. If you aren't maybe stop copy pasting shareblue. They aren't /are guys/

File: 1865786678.jpg (124KB, 1050x700px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 1050x700px

>>134236718
What are you even talking about man?

>>134234950
Enquirer > Fake News CNN
I know, I know...I never thought we'd reach that point, either.

>>134236514
Avoid it.

>>134236762
It's ok. The fact you guys are here is a good sign. :)

File: 1768768787.jpg (100KB, 766x960px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 766x960px

>>134236797
I always respond with pepes and other shit?Just because shareblue uses them doesn't me I am one of them.It's apart of /pol/ for fucks sake.

File: ants.png (11KB, 300x250px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 300x250px

>>134234849

>the national enquirer

Wew do drumpflets ever get tired of making shit up that no one believes?

File: 1123456734235746.jpg (247KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

247KB, 1024x1024px

>>134234849
Once again the DemocRATs incompetency is the reason they are empty handed
Next Time you are trying to frame someone, make sure you get them to commit actual crime!
It's a shame the Russian collusion is almost done by now... Media could have 3 more years of investigating anybody visiting Trump buildings or his hotels an their facebook friends for Russian ties

'To put it in spy terms it was like a honey trap, Only they weren't selling sex to Donald Jr. They were selling fictitious dirt of Hillary,' said former CIA officer Larry C. Johnson.

'And once they bit on the meeting, they had him right where they wanted him!'

As for why this firm, Fusion GPS, would want to aid in this setup, a congressional source told the tabloid: 'These guys had a vested personal interest and ideological interest in smearing Trump and boosting Hillary's chances of winning the White House.'


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4711832/Evil-Hillary-Clinton-framed-Trump-family-Russia.html#ixzz4nJsK2CEU

>>134234849
wow /pol/ writes for the National Enquirer now?

"There are also claims that a Hillary agent has Fusion do 'opposition research' prior to starting the firm, along with a claim that Fusion has 'stonewalled' Senate investigators who requested their communications with the FBI and Justice Department.

"Johnson believes the 'Trump Tower meeting' is the real Fusoion syaroy, saying: 'If you're trying to build a case the Trump campaign colluded with Russia, then you crate a situation where there is indeed a Russian for them to collude with - and that's exactly what Veselnitskyaya.'


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4711832/Evil-Hillary-Clinton-framed-Trump-family-Russia.html#ixzz4nJswppCR
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

File: 1496793081433.png (161KB, 480x476px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 480x476px

>>134236711
Of course it works, that's why people are paid to come here and disrupt us. Funny thing though, the real LOSERS are the ones that come here for free and think they're going to change anything. That's like reading bedtime stories to a room full of rapists with aids....you're not gonna cure any of them and most likely you're gonna end up with aids.

File: P3hPyR3.jpg (81KB, 1023x731px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 1023x731px

NE has broken several legit stories first. They also had the Clinton fixer speak to them during the election (obviously no MSM would dare touch that guy). We're at the point where tabloids are unironically better news outlets than the MSM

National Enquirer releases 'exhaustive investigation' into 'evil Hillary Clinton' claiming she framed the Trump family over Russia and the Don Jr. meeting was a setup

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4711832/Evil-Hillary-Clinton-framed-Trump-family-Russia.html#ixzz4nJthLFZc
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

File: 1499741556351.jpg (55KB, 452x362px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 452x362px

>>134237280
It comes from
>SOURCE
so it must be fake!

>>134237734
I like to believe that NE is seeing how much of a joke the MSM has become so they're using it as an opportunity to boost their own credibility. Besides, the news has gotten so wacky now that they don't even need to bullshit most of it.

>>134234849
We really have crossed a threshold when a fucking tabloid is the one telling the truth.

>>134234849
Yea, we know.

>>134234849
what is co-intelpro for $400?

>>134237940
Agreed

File: 1484924148003.jpg (575KB, 1280x1795px) Image search: [Google]

575KB, 1280x1795px

>>134236841
Shut up faggot and stop asking retarded questions

So, to boil this down to its broth, Veselnitskaya — who had on her payroll lobbyists including a retired socialist Democrat U.S. congressman — was working in the United States on an expired visa that was extended by Democrat Attorney General Loretta Lynch (who is up to her eyeballs in conflicts of interest protecting Hillary Clinton who has her own ties to Russia). That congressman failed to register as a foreign agent representing a Russian-driven effort. Veselnitskaya also has ties to the group that says it produced the “dossier” claiming that Trump is a puppet of Putin. And the “big story” — the “smoking gun” — the liberal mainstream media is reporting is that Trump, Jr. met with her?

Given her ties to both anti-American and anti-Trump causes, it bears asking whether the meeting between her and Trump, Jr. was a well-calculated set-up. If not, the enemies of Trump and America were at least well-placed to seize the moment and turn this to their benefit. And those enemies in media are deliberately emphasizing minor issues while completely ignoring the real story.

https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/26512-media-pounce-on-trump-jr-s-meeting-with-russian-lawyer-ignore-her-ties-to-democrats

http://archive.is/1D6rr

File: image.jpg (8KB, 123x200px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 123x200px

>>134235655
Your life is a joke

File: 1493567545566.png (22KB, 612x491px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 612x491px

>>134238383
wew lad

Russian lawyer Veselnitskaya Confesses – says lobbyist Bill Browder behind Trump Jr. scandal. Says she is in fear for her life & family

http://investmentwatchblog.com/russian-lawyer-veselnitskaya-confesses-says-lobbyist-bill-browder-behind-trump-jr-scandal-says-she-is-in-fear-for-her-life-family/

http://archive.is/5Evdu

>>134234849
I would love to hear news this good, but sadly it's fake.
>There is no direct proof that Fusion coordinated with Veselnitskyaya to frame Don Jr. other than a claim that the Russian lawyer had previously worked with the firm back in 2012 'to undermine a 2012 American law called the Magnitsky Act.'

What’s Left of Russiagate – Are We Down to the 1,000 Paid Trolls?

https://caucus99percent.com/content/what’s-left-russiagate-–-are-we-down-1000-paid-trolls

http://archive.is/l2mke

File: 1234574635241343.jpg (185KB, 1445x928px) Image search: [Google]

185KB, 1445x928px

>>134234849
let's don't forget (((somebody))) from the inside gave Don Jr. email to NYTimes
Someone how has her eyes on the throne and think of other Trump children as treat and wants to get them out of the way

>>134234849
step by step.... and /pol/ played a big role on it

remember it guys

>>134234849
(((national enquirer)))

File: 4yJh4xN.jpg (68KB, 612x612px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 612x612px

>>134240244
You're on to something in that Chelsea is probably the one singing but I don't think it's some terrible thing. I think she really was taken aback by her parent's misdeeds.

RUSSIAN LAWYER TESTIFYING IN CONGRESS ABOUT FUSION GPS, TIES TO HILLARY CLINTON AND LORETTA LYNCH

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6dTdJCgusxk

GUCCIFER 2.0 BREAKING NEWS: Fusion GPS, Crowdstrike, DNC Worked To Create Guccifer 2.0

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=EE23J-asdJQ

>>134240564
They seem to make new links in this story though...

Have a bump

>>134236201
Bat Boy was Weekly World News...

>>134234849
/pol/ was talking about this whole thing like 2 weeks ago

>>134234849
I'm sorry, but this is fake news.

I've reported this post to a subreddit moderator and they will remove it shortly for breaking the rules.

Thank you..

File: shillary shattered.png (612KB, 920x776px) Image search: [Google]

612KB, 920x776px

>>134234849

She's got to blame someone. She's never taken personal responsibility for that ass whippin' she got from a political rookie.

they're more journalists than CNN so I will consider this legit til I see otherwise

>>134234849
Ok, so the russia story is bullshit. But, what about the two scoops of ice cream? I believe that is real and enough for an investigation. Maybe even impeechment. Remember it was her turn after all.

>>134236995
dude. who cares? wtf

File: 1500502023205.jpg (52KB, 720x720px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 720x720px

>>134234950
Yup Donald the Conman is buddies with the paper's owner.

>>134234950
They were, sure, but where is it written that everything they say has to be false?

File: 1499477755300.jpg (43KB, 820x820px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 820x820px

>>134234849
I-is it finally happening?

lads this is it, the happening moment

"Lock her up"

File: journalists colluding with clinton.png (172KB, 671x1206px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 671x1206px

>>134246367

good thing we have the (((MSM))) to tell us the truth!!

File: IMG_4178.jpg (64KB, 581x499px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 581x499px

Boy, this thread sure slides fast.

>>134236955
Obviously, we all but write their articles for them

>>134234849
Every fucking normie will see this at the grocery checkout. Hahahahaha.

>>134234849

Fake news does not exist

but if it did exist then this would be it

>>134234950
Some stories are intentionally leaked to the Enquirer first specifically because of it's reputation as a rag.

>>134248448
This can't be fake, it broke on /pol/ and /pol/ is always right

>>134234950
To be honest famalamadingdong the national enquirer has more credibility as the whole Fake News collective together.

>>134234950

It actually is not. Everyone is so comfortable suing them if they lie that they took to instead being completely honest. They mislead people of course with their headlines, but the facts presented are genuine.

Like they'll say some politician has been shockingly found out to be a transvestite, then show how the guy had dressed up in a costume for a Halloween party. It's kinda true, but misleading.

Always check the " Hot Sheets " - Agent K

>>134234849

You want to know how I know that this is bullshit? Because the assertion is that Hillary Clinton was desperate enough to do this, but never used it against Trump during the election.

That for some reason, she chose to save it for a time when not only would it not get a democrat in the white-house, but a time when it would be thoroughly investigated, leaving her, a private citizen, in a position where she would eventually be found out and not have the opportunity to obtain a pardon from a member of her own party if forced to resign.

>>134249229
apparently

>>134234950
No one knows what's real anymore.

>>134239770

Figured, but you already know it's fake because of >>134253176

Even if you don't look into it whatsoever. It makes no sense at all that Clinton would have chosen not to use this in the election.

>>134253176
It's a desperate move. The reason it's so sloppy was because the meeting wasn't meant to be a story for mass consumption. It was a set up to justify fisa warrants.

>>134253176
>Hillary Clinton was desperate enough to do this, but never used it against Trump during the election.
She thought she didn't need white men, and massively overestimated democratic turnout and underestimated people's resentment to political dynasties. I don't think she tarted to panic until very late in the game. Too late.

>>134234849
What's up with all these right wing media outlets being grocery store checkout tabloid tier? They need to work on their presentation.

>>134239270
You need to go back

>>134234950
>>134235309
>>134235923
>>134235923
>>134249102
>>134250829
Everyone already forgot that they broke that Ted Cruz sex scandal piece that ended up being a giant nothing burger.

>>134234950
This. >>134253176

huh. And then news breaks that pufferfish face Mccain has brain cancer

>>134234950
They broke the lewinsky scandal

>>134253652

Still doesn't add up.

If she was desperate enough to try to set up an illegal meeting to entrap Donalds campaign, she would have been desperate enough by the end of the election to use it against him.

The fact that she never did and that it instead came out many months afterwards is clear indication that democrats weren't aware. Otherwise this meeting would have been on CNN on day one.

>>134253530

Except the FISA warrant against Carter Page was not related to this meeting in any way and the timing is still off.

End of the day, the meeting was a product of Trumps family and aides not understanding the law most likely. The whole "Democrat entrapment" thing is ridiculous.

Yes, back in the 80's & 90's they were trash. Then they got sued multiple times for their bullshit and lost millions.
After that, they make sure to check & double check that shit. But anytime they break anything about the Clintons, it gets buried with something else. Clintons never deny any of it.

Example: During the election they had an interview with the Clintons life long "hitman" said he did all their dirty work. That got buried & ignored never denied tho

Look up Enquirer history.

>>134245245
I'm slipping in my old age, it would seem. My other points still stand.

This is a literal fake news outlet owned by a guy trump is friends with.
There's nothing new here it's the damage control conspiracy theory trump cucks have been claiming since this broke. The timeline makes no sense the email would absolutely have come out during the election if it was a setup.

We always felt like this was the case, but now we have evidence for this.

>>134237734
What's a Clinton fixer

>>134254199
>If she was desperate enough to try to set up an illegal meeting to entrap Donalds campaign, she would have been desperate enough by the end of the election to use it against him.
I understand your point, but if she thought she would be in the highest office in America, wouldn't that push her to take risks? She had the support of a lot of people in the deep state. The whole fuckfest with the attorney general collusion comes to mind as well.

>>134239551
How did msm get the emails? I thought veslnitskyia gave it to them.

File: 1481363998751.jpg (532KB, 1050x888px) Image search: [Google]

532KB, 1050x888px

The fake Russia narrative has ALWAYS been about Hillary Clinton.

She and Obama are behind the whole thing.

Clinton desperately wants to cover for her abysmal failure in the presidential election. Surely she couldn't be to blame for losing, despite the fact that she was a horrible, divisive candidate that people genuinely hated.

That's where Russia comes in.

Just look at how much this bitch had going for her. It would take you five minutes to read everything in this image. The election was rigged in her favor and she still fucking lost! And now she's desperate to have someone to blame.

>>134234849
If this is true, get prepared for more suicides by those connected to the Clintons.

File: shillary and the russians.png (469KB, 1164x882px) Image search: [Google]

469KB, 1164x882px

>>134253176
>Hillary Clinton was desperate enough to do this, but never used it against Trump during the election.

you obviously missed this post.
>>134245804

Shillary would never have brought it up during the election because her Clintoon Foundation had taken millions from the Russians for the US's urainium while she was sitting as Secretary as State. Her hands were filthy with Russian money.

This was in the gmail dump. It was baiscally how the russian narrative was created. They probably got it here or at channel8.

>>134255407
An anonymous source gave the emails to NYT, but Don Jr ended up releasing them on twitter before NYT could publish them.

>>134240244
>gave Don Jr. email to NYTimes

Don Jr did to get out in front of the story.

>>134253176
Because it wasn't Hillary. It was Obama and the government, this is how they got the FISA order and got the green light to start "wiretapping" Trump. They purposely worded the Email to Don Jr. so as to warrant the surveillance. Their hope was to find something YUGE, they found nothing.

>>134234849
National Enquirer only deals in facts, like the one about Hillary having a secret alien baby

>>134255239

Okay, she was willing to take risks. So if she was willing to risk setting up the meeting, why was she not willing to USE the meeting during the election to try to hurt Donald?

It's bullshit.

>>134255765

What was the point, then? The Uranium deal where Clinton wasn't even present at the meetings? The same one where she would not have even had the authority to stop or allow the deal?

Also nobody surrendered any Uranium, a foreign energy company (Rosatom) wanted to buy stock in a Canadian company which operated mines in the U.S. This required the CFIUS to gather information to make a decision on the deal. Clinton did not, nor could she have controlled the committees decision if she wanted to.

>>134254199
We're talking about a woman whose only reason for walking the strrets a free citizen is that the FBI Director thought she was too incompetent to remember the basics of her security briefings.
He sat in front of television cameras and listed her crimes for fifteen minutes, then said she was too dumb to know it was illegal so we shouldn't press charges.

>>134235655
another $.02 for you anon

>>134248051
this.

I have seen this shit happen multiple times. The weaponized autism along with the free floating autism around the planet concentrated in this one spot puts together new, novel, and reliable information time and time again. to think that """""journalists""""" don't browse here is p dumb

>>134256255

looool.

Well, come back when you have some definitive evidence. Until then it's a pretty kooky and wild conspiracy theory you've got there.

Setting up meetings to obtain FISA warrants to carry out surveillance on a political opponent during an election, then failing to use anything that you learned to try to win the election for your side in any way.

Makes for a hell of a weird story.

>>134255966
>An anonymous source
anon

>>134253881
Children shouldn't visit this site, run a long.
also
>>>134234849
>25 posts by this Id
quit being so obvious, national enquirer shill

>>134256414

Doesn't matter what Comey thinks. If the new FBI director feels differently, he could recommend charges and then it would be up to Sessions at the DOJ to go ahead and try the case.

The issue wasn't "Oh this isn't important" or "Oh she's just silly", the issue was that everyone could see that there wasn't going to be a way to prove that her intent was to mishandle things or to transmit them inappropriately in such a way as to constitute a crime.

Crimes are very specific things. It's why they're not jumping the gun with Trumps admin.

>>134254199
She wasn't even thinking about trump the last week of the campaign by her own admission. It's called an October surprise for a reason because you gotta let that turd have time to breathe before the election. You can't drop news like that the day or two before . She passed the point of no return and didn't pull the trigger

>>134235309
They break stories trump tells them to break.

>>134256617

>Maybe they didn't find anything useful because Trump didn't actually let Putin hack the election like CNN told you

Wow isn't that just quacking crazy Jimbo?

Nothing is impossible anymore, I wouldn't put it past them to do something like that. They thought they were too big to fail.

Getting nervous?

>>134256911

That's bullshit, there is no 'point of no return' with her. She would have tried anything, even in the last days.

Not to mention that there's still zero direct proof, only suggestion and speculation. Also are you sure it was Hillary? Some of the other users seem to think it was Obama who did it.

Can you guys make up your mind as to which conspiracy theory you're pursuing?

>>134256982
you're a fuckin newfag, this shit is like months old and everyone slept on it then.
You faggots are late to the punch, learn to do your jobs better than vietnamese anime forum maybe
inb4 hurr durr shill
I already knew the russia narrative was fake, but you faggots trying to get a penny here is cringe

>>134256884
Intent is irrelevant to the criminality in those statutes, anon.
I'm talking about your assertion that she would have done X given the circumstances of Y because she's at least Z smart.

>>134257108
Perspective? IT here

>>134256396

Garsh! She wasn't even there??! Well that settles that. It's almost like you had that script ready to go!

>When Hillary Clinton was secretary of state, the Russian-owned Rosatom was buying up a Canadian mining company called Uranium One, which had mining prospects in the U.S. Bill Clinton received $500,000 from a Russian bank selling Uranium One futures, while the chairman of Uranium One donated over two million dollars to the Clinton Foundation prior to the sale. The sale had to be approved by the Committee On Foreign Investment, in which the secretary of state is one of the principal actors reviewing business transactions that involve America’s national security priorities. Needless to say, with the cash flowing, the sale was approved. Is there a direct link? No, there is nothing saying if you give us money, we’ll approve the sale, but it’s part of a long history of donations to the Clinton Foundation that ends up benefitting the donor economically or politically somewhere down the road.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2017/07/12/flashback-that-time-clinton-surrendered-american-uranium-mines-to-russia-n2353586

>>134257149
>Maybe they didn't find anything useful because Trump didn't actually let Putin hack the election like CNN told you

How the hell would Donald let anyone hack anything? He was only a candidate.

Also, you're going to have to explain "nothing useful" to me in the context of everything that has been uncovered in the investigation so far, which the administration has lied about and very poorly attempted to conceal.

It seems like you're confusing a slow investigation with a hollow one. And finally, you need to recognize that there's a difference between living in reality and being a CNN loving liberal.

>>134254199
She didn't use it because they didn't get anything out of it.

They tried to entrap, and it failed. Nothing illegal was said by Trump's team.

The only reason it's back out in the open is because the NYT chased it for months and was planning on releasing it as a slow drip for maximum damage just to keep the words "Trump Russia" in the headlines.

>So fucking obvious I'm shaking my head I even had to type that.

>>134234849
How was school today,Ivan?

>>134257635
I get it anon. So right. And this is not news to me it was in the gmail dump. But, that source is not confirmed.

EXCLUSIVE: Cybersecurity experts who were first to conclude that Putin hacked presidential election ABANDON some of their claims against Russia - and refuse to co-operate with Congress

CrowdStrike is also refusing to testify in public to the House Intelligence Committee on what it knows and declined to speak to DailyMail.com

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4376628/New-questions-claim-Russia-hacked-election.html#ixzz4nKfk4Bbm
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

>>134257522

It would have been awfully silly for them to pay Bill to try to get their uranium deal pushed through, since, again, Clinton would not have had sole control over whether or not it was permitted.

Other issues include the fact that nobody attempted to conceal the fact that he had given a speech at gathering of financial people in Russia and that they never attempted to conceal the payment.

>Is there a direct link? No, there is nothing saying if you give us money, we’ll approve the sale, but it’s part of a long history of donations to the Clinton Foundation that ends up benefitting the donor economically or politically somewhere down the road.

Whoa, whoa, so now we're talking about the foundation to support that theory? I thought the source was citing Willies speaking fee?

Anyway the problem with that is that the foundation is subject to regulatory oversight, and isn't structured to function as the Clintons personal piggy bank.

If you have documents or some other form of proof I'd be very interested to add it to my list of reasons to legitimately hate the Clintons. If not, this is bs conspiracy innuendo.

CrowdStrike, based in Irvine, California, is also the only group that the DNC allowed to directly examine its servers.

Not even the FBI has been granted access to the servers.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4376628/New-questions-claim-Russia-hacked-election.html#ixzz4nKgVnCC7
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

File: 1483627440062.jpg (62KB, 600x709px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 600x709px

>>134256396

>And then there was the alleged quid-pro-quo, something the Clintons know a lot about. During her time at the State Department in 2010, new sanctions on Russia were initially blocked despite calls from Congress they be implemented. The sanctions, eventually put into place in 2012, targeted a number of Russian officials and individuals close to the government for human rights violations. One of the banks under scrutiny was Renaissance Capital, which paid former President Bill Clinton $500,000 to give a speech in Moscow shortly after the State Department, with Hillary in charge, blocked sanctions against the financial institution.

>“Shortly before Bill Clinton’s speech in 2010, when members of Congress pushing the sanctions bill had asked Hillary Clinton to refuse visas to Russian officials implicated under the policy, the State Department denied the request,” Fox News reports. “Former President Bill Clinton’s speech to Renaissance just weeks later was all the more curious, considering Renaissance’s Russian investment bank executives would have been banned from the U.S. under the law.”

>Apparently Bill had an impact and delivered a notable speech. After all, Russian President Vladimir Putin personally called him to express his gratitude.

http://thehill.com/opinion/katie-pavlich/342628-pavlich-clintons-russia-dirt

Standing by my original assertion, Shillary would never have brought up Trump/Russia because her grifter hands were dirty with Russian money.

File: IMG_2175.jpg (175KB, 1209x892px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 1209x892px

>>134236888
I did

>>134238623
Thank you. Note that the retired congressman is commie-lover Ron Dellums.

Alperovitch canceled a March 15 interview with Voice of America, the news outlet that first reported CrowdStrike had misstated data from the ISSS.

However CrowdStrike is proving hostile to further scrutiny of its methods, DailyMail.com can disclose.

Last month, CrowdStrike's co-founder Dmitri Alperovitch and its president Shawn Henry turned down an invitation to testify before the House Intelligence Committee about Russian interference in the U.S. election.

'They declined the invitation, so we're communicating with them about speaking to us privately,' said Jack Langer, a spokesperson for House Intelligence Committee chairman Devin Nunes.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4376628/New-questions-claim-Russia-hacked-election.html#ixzz4nKh64o9L
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

>>134257635

The fact that they didn't report the meeting to the FBI would have been more than enough to kick up tons of controversy. They would have spent weeks leading up to the election talking about exactly what they're talking about now, except then it might have helped their side in the polls. They would have been on every single day with:

>What was said?
>Were any deals made?
>Who was there?
>Why didn't they tell the FBI?

Stop playing stupid and making shit up just to support the theory. Reminder that there is still no direct evidence whatsoever for the theory, as usual with /pol/.

File: 1496353555370s.jpg (5KB, 250x249px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 250x249px

>>134258140
That pic. That comment.

>>134258112
>Standing by my original assertion, Shillary would never have brought up Trump/Russia because her grifter hands were dirty with Russian money.

So she set up the meeting with no intention of it ever becoming public? You're going to have to elaborate on that.

>>134256236
No they knew about it and supposedly already had the emails. Some nyt numale was freaking out about getting scooped by don jr himself after they warned him they were gonna release it.

>>134234950
CNN ranks under National Enquirer, they used to do Bat Boy Found In Cave type shit but they have come full circle, and they hate that nasty bitch Hillary because she smells like a half empty can of rotten tuna

>>134258280
How fucking deluded can one get?

File: rinat_working_together.png (558KB, 1477x995px) Image search: [Google]

558KB, 1477x995px

>>134234849

>>134257477
logs between trump server and russian server were faked

File: translation.png (376KB, 615x371px) Image search: [Google]

376KB, 615x371px

>>134256396

>But the connection to Russia and Bill’s $500,000 speech doesn’t stop there. In fact, the big speech payout also came when the State Department, again with Hillary at the helm, was negotiating a Russian uranium deal with a company better known as Uranium One. Uranium One founders also happened to be Clinton Foundation donors.

>“Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States,” The New York Times reported in 2015. “Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.”

>Finally, government watchdog Judicial Watch recently published a number of new emails belonging to Hillary Clinton that were not previously turned over to the State Department as required by law. This batch not only contains more classified information Clinton stored on her private server, but also reveals Clinton was doing favors for a Russia connection group through the Clinton Foundation while serving as Secretary of State.

>“The new emails also reveal a number of favors that were requested and carried out,” Judicial Watch found. “In May 2010, [Huma] Abedin tells [Doug] Band that she has ‘hooked up’ people from the Russian American Foundation with ‘the right people’ at the State Department after Abedin received a request from Russian American Foundation Vice President Rina Kirshner, forwarded by Clinton Foundation donor Eddie Trump (no relation to President Trump).”

http://thehill.com/opinion/katie-pavlich/342628-pavlich-clintons-russia-dirt

>>134257566
I'm saying they orchestrated this entire thing in order to be cleared to go ahead and spy on Trump, hoping to find actual evidence of Trump working directly with the Russian government to in some way influence the election or engage in any and all illicit activity.

Obviously they found nothing substantial

>everything that has been uncovered so far

What are you actually referring to here? What illegal thing has been uncovered?

>>134258789
Archive shills
https://archive.is/Am0qx

>>134258365
> no direct evidence whatsoever for the theory, as usual with /pol/
My life. The gmail dump aka State Department dump has not been confirmed. That is where this info seems to have some from.

File: trump_server_logs.png (4MB, 1983x5083px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 1983x5083px

>>134258708

>>134234950
Better than CNN.

>>134256884
She deleted te emails after getting subpeonad. Through other emails the fbi had it was determined that she had deleted relevant emails containing classified information. Unquestionable obstruction of justice regardless of all the security crimes she committed. But nah lol she dindu nuffin it's just a matter.

>>134258708
Okay, yeah. That was pretty much proven way back. Read the headlines, never saw the proof. Thank you anon.

>>134234950
They're sensationalists and have a lower barrier for front page articles than normal news sites. They sometimes get good scoops though.

>>134257635
Exactly. And she thought she was going to win, right up to election day. In the final week(s) of the campaign she even directed resources to states she was sure to win, so that she wouldn't just win by electoral votes, but by a large popular vote margin. Oops!

The National Enquirer has a dodgy past, and they don't always get things right, but they have a pretty good track record recently for scooping the MSM on stories the MSM isn't interested in. The Russian thing sure looks like a setup to me.

>>134258280

Louise Mensch -- Born Louise Bagshawe
Changed her name to Mensch which is Yiddish for someone to admire and emulate, someone of noble character.

fucking laughable

>>134258919
What a shame. But the truth.

>>134257204
>you guys
Maybe there's multiple people here all with different ideas you stupid faggot.

>>134258004
>and isn't structured to function as the Clintons personal piggy bank
Lol yea Chelsea's wedding was just a charitable cause

>>134259283
The NE has actually reported on plenty of real stories.
It's half joke, half legit.

File: all your base.jpg (45KB, 634x478px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 634x478px

>>134258833

thanks for the tip

>>134259440
I know I recall it. Blew me away when they did it. Did CNN report anything truthful in the last 6 months? Seems I read a headline that they actually did. I could be wrong.

>>134258365
Why would they report a random nothing burger to the FBI? There is no law stating that they are required to do so. Nothing illegal was said. No cause for reporting the meeting. Period. Shilling "muh Trump Russia" narrative in the ensuing months does not retroactively make it cause for alarm.

>Reminder that there is still no direct evidence whatsoever for the theory

If you're referring to Trump and Russia collusion, then you're correct.

If you're referring to the National Enquirer, I'm eating my popcorn, I suggest you get yours ready as well. They have a history of getting huge scoops first and being proven right. I remember the John Edwards literal love-child affair like it was yesterday, and he was the Dem Vice Presidential nominee. The actual nominee.

>>134259736
Nothing comes to mind, honestly.

>>134254031

I thought that was drudge

>>134253176
They were hoping Trump would bite on the fake information and try to use it in the campaign. Then they would be able to create a scandal out of it. Also the left hadn't yet been worked up into a fervor over Russia at that time. Imagine if back then they had tried to create a scandal out of "Trump's son met with a Russia lawyer about Hillary's crooked dealings". People would be more interested in knowing what the information was that they talked about in the meeting, not about the scandal of meeting a Russian lawyer.

>>134259925
Nah, Drudge got it from them. He just made it undeniable.

>increasingly nervous man says Hillary is going to be locked up for the 20th time

File: Committee on Foreign Investment.png (240KB, 933x970px) Image search: [Google]

240KB, 933x970px

>>134258004

So, just to be clear, you're trying to convince us it would have been impossible for the Democrats and the Clintons to have political appointees or sympathetic career government employees sitting on this committee to approve the Urainium deal for them.

I suppose it would take some effort to research the names, but it would be very interesting to see what it reveals.

t. Former career federal employee

I'll address the rest of your post in a minute.

>>134260084
He is a thumb drive. That has been proven.
These helicopter captchas are bugging me. After puppy tosser, I'm a little paranoid

>>134234950
Well, Hillary can sue for any untrue things they print!
Go for it hill!!!
IM WITH HURR

>>134259886

>Why would they report a random nothing burger to the FBI? There is no law stating that they are required to do so. Nothing illegal was said. No cause for reporting the meeting. Period. Shilling "muh Trump Russia" narrative in the ensuing months does not retroactively make it cause for alarm.

They could have used the PERCEPTION, just as they're using the PERCEPTION now. Even if the public doesn't have all of the facts and even if there is no evidence, the fact that they didn't report it and even attempted to conceal it would have been useful to the media against Trump.

>If you're referring to Trump and Russia collusion, then you're correct.

There is already actual evidence suggesting that, and the investigation is only a few months old. It will continue for over another year, most likely.

>>134260006

Any evidence for that, or is that just a scenario you came up with that happens to support the theory?

>>134234849
>Believes The National Inquirer is a legitimate news source
>Believes he's the smartest one here
>Believes The National Inquirer is a legitimate news source

You're either a toll or stupid. No, Wait. You're definitely stupid.

>>134258708

That is so badly done

>>134260465

You can research names all you like, but what you need is some sort of evidence that there was quid pro quo trade going on between 500K in speaking fees (Or donations to the foundation, whichever version of this you prefer) and Hillary, and also that Hillary was trying to squeeze the committee to arrive at a specific decision because of the donations/speaking fees.

>>134260596
I'm telling you it was in that gmail dump. That's where they got it. Probably from anon. He does stuff like that. gmail dump is not confirmed source, though.

>>134255765
Crooked Hillary with Saul Alinsky tactics
Such a whore
LMAO

File: humas weiner.jpg (43KB, 911x569px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 911x569px

>>134258998

Not only that but destroyed, what was it again ... THIRTEEN!!! ... other devices that were connected to that server. (Except for the Weiner/Huma device).

>>134260596
>cant spell the name of the paper correctly with an image of it directly in front of him

Pot.
Kettle.
Nigger.

>>134260733
>That is so badly done
And how much time did it take to do that? Junior type this out a gazillion times.

>>134260525
>PERCEPTION
There was no perception of Trump/Russia at the time of the election. The media had not had sufficient time to push the narrative. You're too quickly forgetting the atmosphere eight (yes EIGHT) months ago. There was no Russia narrative, it had not been concocted as an excuse for Hillary's loss because she hadn't lost yet. It was very loosely floated (for example, during one of the debates) by Hillary and was literally laughed at by the audience because of how absurd it was and still is.

Pushing a patently retarded narrative with no evidence other than a singular meeting would have opened Hillary up to a counter-punch on the same Russia topic. Who do you think is more vulnerable on the topic of Russia? Keep in mind we're talking at LEAST eight months ago. Hillary has and had far, FAR more vulnerability.

>There is already actual evidence suggesting
Wow, yah mean there's evidence *suggesting* that there's *hard evidence* somewhere?

Don't make me laugh, anon. Scratch that, too late :D

>>134259925

Drudge never was a reporter, he's more like a news aggregator.

File: untitledff.png (367KB, 731x415px) Image search: [Google]

367KB, 731x415px

Glenn Simpson (FusionGPS)

>>134261183
Hey, why not whiskey? Are you one of those haters opposed to straight Kentucky bourbon?

File: e2b.jpg (25KB, 428x500px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 428x500px

>national enquirer
We now live in a world where literarl tabloids are more trustworthy then the news

>>134234950
>Isn't that a fucking joke magazine

Used to be.

Since TV formats such as "A Current Affair" & "Entertainment Tonight" were taken over by what used to be network & cable "news", it left a void of actual news & investigative journalism. Tabloids such as The Daily Mail & NE have apparently stepped up to fill that gaping void.
Recent case-in-point:
Anyone notice how Fox "News" is talking about OJ getting out of prison & discussing him, but no mention of Denny Hastert and his prison/scandals? Freaking guy was Speaker for 8 years!

>>134261488
This.
Hope you get to feeling better.

>>134261552
Rip in piss John Edwards

File: Cornyn.jpg (230KB, 667x1024px) Image search: [Google]

230KB, 667x1024px

>>134260838

You're absolutely correct. I'll contact my Senator, who sits on the Judiciary Committee, and ask him to look into it.

>>134261552
True anon. What year is it? 1984. Never mind me.

>>134234950
>the first post..
seems you cunts monitor this /pol/ too

>>134260525
>Any evidence for that, or is that just a scenario you came up with that happens to support the theory?
It's just my theory.

>>134262003
He has a point. Why you read that /pol/? No, he has not point WE PICKED IT UP IN THE MEDIA...fag

>>134262008
Don't want to be Glenn. Not now.

>>134261300

This would literally have helped jumpstart that narrative.

>They're only saying it because Hillary lost

Lol man, no, they're saying it because Trumps team have given them (Both democrat AND republican lawmakers) reason to say it. Reason to investigate.

>Hillary more vulnerable to Russia fallout

Wow lol. Yeah that's why Trump is having his DOJ look into her connections instead of tweeting allegations right? Why isn't he, if it's such a sure thing? Don't tell me you think that now the Republicans are protecting Clinton too?

>no evidence

Right, except for the actual evidence that has been uncovered so far. Laugh all you like, but this investigation is going to remain a fixture in American politics for probably another year and a half, and they're only going to uncover more from here on out.


>>134261718

Haven't you stopped to think for a moment why that is? Why they haven't looked into it? Do you wonder why they don't go looking for the Loch Ness monster, too?

File: 1421020893532.png (2MB, 1065x902px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1065x902px

>>134258004
>The foundation took in some $338 million in 2014 and doled out just $4 million in 10 grants in the U.S.

Sure doesn't sound like a pot for receiving bribes.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jun/21/clinton-foundation-gives-tiny-fraction-of-2-billio/

File: 1471159539170.png (396KB, 1412x2148px) Image search: [Google]

396KB, 1412x2148px

>>134262217
are you trying to look retarded?

Theres a new gas pipeline going in through Ukraine, funny how the "rebels" just decided they wanted to make their plans for "little russia" known.. and on the anniversary of the MH17 crash.

>>134262332
Why the fuck would you save an illegible thumbnail?

File: 1496361874123s.jpg (5KB, 250x130px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 250x130px

There is one big problem I see here. Everyone has theory and none of us have a fact.

>>134260006
>Imagine if back then they had tried to create a scandal out of "Trump's son met with a Russia lawyer about Hillary's crooked dealings". People would be more interested in knowing what the information was that they talked about in the meeting, not about the scandal of meeting a Russian lawyer.
This is a really good point. Had the whole "collusion with Russia" angle even begun yet? They had to meme that whole angle into existence out of nothing first so they could slam this email down.

>>134262845
Doesn't stop the Media and their bullshit stories

>>134263005
True. Should slow us down, methinks.

>>134261175
Holy shit....is the trump 4d nuke about to drop? Is this guy legit?

>>134263005
I believe you are witnessing the demise of mainstream media. Can we add that to the prophecy thread?

File: 492e9e75-bb6b-45e9-974e-e21082c49a28.png (404KB, 853x480px) Image search: [Google]

404KB, 853x480px

>>134239551
>fears for her family
I wonder why

File: 1495903101322s.jpg (2KB, 125x75px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 125x75px

>>134263269
I so hope that is true

File: Screenshot-Dellums-Russian-Lawyer.jpg (91KB, 941x612px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 941x612px

Business partners

>>134262464
>Why they haven't looked into it?

I'd imagine they have a very full plate at the moment. Maybe it is a big juicy nothing bacon cheese burger that's gotten cold and soggy.

>>134234849

Everybody colludes with somebody all the time, that's the trick.
>Sessions had Russia ties!!!
Yeah, as part of his job.
>Businessmen had talks with Russia!!
They're fucking businessmen.
Are you globalists for open borders or not?
If you say you are then none of this shit matters.

File: 1495751960331s.jpg (2KB, 125x92px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 125x92px

>>134263493
DNC?

>>134234849
>HUGE BREAKING: Hillary Framed Trump on Russia (NATIONAL ENQUIRER BREAKING NOW)
We've seen this before. National Enquirer has face far too many lawsuits to risk publishing something like this unless they could prove it.

She is now officially fucked.

>>134262464
>This would literally have helped jumpstart that narrative.

Would have opened up the much more vulnerable Hillary to the same allegations. A random nothing-burger meeting vs outrageous speaking fees, uranium one, etc. Real things, anon. Unlike the Trump/Russia narrative that makes everyone laugh. Well, normal healthy people that is.

>they're saying it because people gave them reason to say it.

You're making me laugh again. Here's what I've seen them say, and mind you this is after months of media hype and "investigations" all of which have occurred a political lifetime after Hillary's laughable defeat:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzrlpKtY2DY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T9gn5H2DIo4

>except for the actual evidence

See above videos for your "actual evidence."

I'm glad the investigation is still around. The longer they drag it out the more irate working people will become that the man they elected has been hindered by a nothing burger. And it will turn out to be a nothing burger, anon. The longer they wait to make that announcement, the worse they will look. We need at least another year for maximum political slingshot. And by the way, once it's over, Trump will be going apeshit with investigations into everyone in the DNC and everyone they have ever known. Good luck with that :)

With the Enquirer and stories like it beginning to surface, it might get cut short. My popcorn is ready either way.

File: reneck_pepe.jpg (10KB, 100x100px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 100x100px

>>134263727
Okay. Third time I said this with no response. Not gonna do it again. This was in the unverified gmail dump. I knew this days ago. We cannot confirm that source. If you know where pic related came from, please say so.

>>134236338
A good friend of trump owns it

>>134264268
What was in it? I saw nothing of the sort and looked through a lot of them.

>>134258796
Swedebro is spot on here. This was the Modern Democrats half assed attempt to hedge their bets just in case they lost. They never really expected to. Even Obama quoted as saying he thought he would just hand the keys over to Hillary and walk away with no transitional woes whatsoever. That's why this entire Muh Russia idiocy feels so half assed. They thought they had it in the bag and once they realized their horse lost in a goddamn electoral landslide they only had this shitty story to fall back on because they never honestly prepared for this scenario. It's why the MSM is a dumpster fire. It's why these boards are shill central. It's why there is no actual evidence of any wrongdoing on the part of the Trump campaign. The Progressive democrat brand is damaged beyond repair unless they can somehow make the public believe in a scapegoat so big and devious that the narrative shifts back to the one they've been forcefeeding us through their compromised channels for at least 8 years. Not gonna happen though. White middle America is awake, and demoralized white guilt America is getting more and more bored with politics by the day. Once their fake ass polls are blown out again in 2018, once their media coverage of how close the 2018 elections are going to be (like all of these special elections they dumped so much money into to win a fucking half assed moral victory) are once again revealed as a failed attempt to drive public opinion through a cultivated narrative, the Democrat's moderates are either going to flip independent or just become so demoralized that they don't even bother with it anymore. As long as we keep twisting the knife and don't fall for their dumb fucking tactics then we can see the modern Democratic Party into its grave.

>>134261175
>It's happening!

Mother of all Keks.

>>134264571
This was in it. Known it for days. May have picked it up on channel 8. Their posts seems to stay up forever. I'm sure it is still there.

>>134261183
Selfkek

>>134264780
Bingo.

>>134253893
Rubio operative Rick Wilson actually dug that shit up ('#TheThing") before the FL primaries and sent it to all the outlets. His "thething" tweets are still online, archived, where he's complaining that nobody will run it.
A Cruz Pac had started the Cruz-Rubio mud-slinging with the foam baths & other crap creepy Marco had done, so WilsonPac hired 2 detectives to follow Cruz.

File: 1496790249784s.jpg (10KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 250x250px

>>134265240
He left out whiskey. I'm offended.

>>134236888
trips of truth

National Enquirer now more reliable source than CNN.

>>134236541
>Kind of like /pol/.
not at all like /pol/. you need to educate yourself on the wisdom of the crowds. and lurk more. a lot fucking more.

File: 1495668253111s.jpg (2KB, 125x95px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 125x95px

>>134265933
Who woulda thunk it?

File: 1498322020023.jpg (36KB, 720x633px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 720x633px

>>134264780
Agreed

>>134265044
the whole story is /pol/'s work.
but "they did the verification" and thus will claim it as their own.
fuckers.

File: biblical.jpg (44KB, 425x263px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 425x263px

>>134258140
lel

>>134265434
/pol/ offended a hot chick. What to do?

File: 1500514201650m.jpg (108KB, 768x1024px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 768x1024px

>>134234950
Better than CNN at this point
>Which makes CNN look bad when tabloids are actually doing real news

>>134235309
Also Monica Lewinski.

File: CuAs6uDXYAAcRVN.jpg (57KB, 668x472px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 668x472px

>>134264780

That's one way to see it but another way to look at this is ...
>This was the Modern Democrats half assed attempt to spy into the political opposition's presidential campaign headquarters under the guise of 'national security'.

Then once they had their asses handed to them, it became an attempt to undermine and de-legitimize the Trump administration.

>democrats set up a phony meeting
>fusion gps sets wheels in motion
>hey trump team we got dirt!
>let's meet
>sure lets hear what you have to say
>enter the nsa foreign intel sweeps
>oh look! we got trump team players meeting with the russians
>all the excuse they need
>garsh! we'd better look deeper into this
>unmasking happens
>democrats lose bigly
>clintoon team meets to salvage their dignity
>podesta gave his email password away
>lets play this russian thing up and blame them
>leak leak leak leak leak leak leak leak leak leak
>non-stop clintoon biased media runs with it
>unmasking discovered
>onion peeled
>hand in cookie jar

and here we are! just saying ....

>>134257206
Who cares if it's old? What's the harm in a review, shill?

>>134258796
>>134264780
THIS.

>>134258004
>It would have been awfully silly for them to pay Bill to try to get their uranium deal pushed through
yep the clintons are actually awfully silly

bold gangsters more like, who never expected to be on the losing side

>>134257957
17 agencys = 3 agencys = crowdstrike = refused to testify

File: 088243855.jpg (100KB, 636x358px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 636x358px

>>134234950
CNN proved anyone can claim to be a serious news organization...

>>134267649
>17 agencys = 3 agencys = crowdstrike = refused to testify

=Ukrainian Collusion=Ukrainian interference

File: 1496439593029s.jpg (6KB, 250x166px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 250x166px

Nuffin. That what you have at this point? I'm on your side but 0+0 =0

>>134234849
>The National Enquirer
Doesnt fucking drumpf owns that shit

>>134258280
is this girl satire? not kidding. I've read rumors she's a plant to make the left seem fucking nuts. if she is, she's done an amazing job

>>134268088
Do a quick search of her name and you'll see that even the left thinks she's nuts.

>>134258280
Being considered...by whom?

File: 3507f4af15430cd384f6f5413d533671e4eac0fa4134db2ad92c76579f2be476.jpg (9KB, 187x255px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 187x255px

>>134268085
Yeah and he owns you too. I know that hurts.

>>134235895
Ya the headlines are sensational but the actual article is real and makes the headline a disappointment.

>>134268599
Oh yeah? Where did you buy your copy?

>>134268599
Not a difficult question.

>>134235655

>posting a blue macro on a red board

What a fucking idiot.

File: d_wee.jpg (179KB, 685x820px) Image search: [Google]

179KB, 685x820px

>>134268599

MSM headlines are getting just as bad.

Something happened - here's what you need to know.

7 things you should know about...

Such and such is bad, here's why

stupid question here
if the left is going to smear the trump family, why haven't they've gone after barron already?

>>134258508
>>134266599
I don't get it.

>>134270582
maybe saying that a classmate of his is russian

>>134240244
>that fucking Adam's apple on Chelsea

>>134270582
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/kathy-griffin-said-in-2016-she-wanted-to-beat-down-donald-and-barron-trump/article/2624828

http://variety.com/2016/biz/news/rosie-odonnell-barron-trump-autism-1201927401/

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/23/arts/television/katie-rich-snl-suspended-barron-trump-tweet.html

Is it time to get comfy yet?

>>134234849
LOL tabloid, are you guys under the age of 20?

Hahahah

>>134256617
>Well, come back when you have some definitive evidence. Until then it's a pretty kooky and wild conspiracy theory you've got there.
Sort of like the Russian Hacking narrative.

>>134247122
>that source column

C-C-COMBO BREAKER

File: trump toillet.jpg (366KB, 1742x1017px) Image search: [Google]

366KB, 1742x1017px

>>134234849
A review of the public record reveals a clear and disturbing pattern: Trump owes much of his business success, and by extension his presidency, to a flow of highly suspicious money from Russia. Over the past three decades, at least 13 people with known or alleged links to Russian mobsters or oligarchs have owned, lived in, and even run criminal activities out of Trump Tower and other Trump properties. Many used his apartments and casinos to launder untold millions in dirty money. Some ran a worldwide high-stakes gambling ring out of Trump Tower—in a unit directly below one owned by Trump. Others provided Trump with lucrative branding deals that required no investment on his part. Taken together, the flow of money from Russia provided Trump with a crucial infusion of financing that helped rescue his empire from ruin, burnish his image, and launch his career in television and politics. “They saved his bacon,” says Kenneth McCallion, a former assistant U.S. attorney in the Reagan administration who investigated ties between organized crime and Trump’s developments in the 1980s.

>>134236338
You a big believer in bay boy?

File: 2E7C40D200000578-0-Say_whaa_The_comedian_is_known_for_his_animated_facial_expressio-a-54_1447656455632.jpg (70KB, 634x597px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 634x597px

>>134234849
>National Enquirer

File: SteveHarveyFamilyFeud.jpg (34KB, 618x412px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 618x412px

>>The Enquirer is owned by Trump friend David Pecker

>>134275358
Not as if this story - which the media bent over backwards to bury - was broke by the National Enquirer. Literally the DNC's Vice Presidential pick:

http://www.nationalenquirer.com/celebrity/sen-john-edwards-caught-mistress-and-love-child/

File: Kerry Edwards Love 9.jpg (12KB, 336x384px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 336x384px

>>134275834
The real story is how John Kerry gave birth.