Why have Europeans excelled at everything compared to all the

whites are spliced with alien dna yes

Snow and mountain cold cold
Need smart smart to live in cold cold
Jungle and desert hot hot
Need fast fast to live in hot hot

>>134149310
Well I figured that but it can't be THAT simple

>>134149310
This.

If you don't know how to trade in Hedeby or Hamburg, you will die. Thus, Angles are the craftiest people on earth, thank god they were bred out by Scots and Welsh to create a much inferior people the English.

File: 1490455105876.jpg (38KB, 590x578px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 590x578px

Europe was a crucible of easily accessible mineral and ecological resources that also forced humans to adapt in order to survive harsh winters and inclimate weather. Africa by comparison is a place with rich mineral resources that are hard to access without already developed technology that's best suited to a simpler lifestyle.

It's like asking why the sunfish is still around, or why sharks haven't changed much in millions of years. If it ain't broke don't fix it.

>>134149065
manorialism

https://jaymans.wordpress.com/2017/01/16/clannishness-the-series-a-finer-grained-look-at-how-it-happened/

>>134149310
Then why aren't Inuits so smart? And why all the early civilizations happened in the Mediterranean region?

>>134149412
It pretty much is.

This combined with the fact that whites started expanding and conquering first, we came out on top. Had anyone else done it first they'd be on top but they didn't and now it can never be undone.

File: 1479085251748.jpg (63KB, 400x500px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 400x500px

>>134149065
You're forgetting Asians.
Yes, they have no souls. But they are generally smarter.

>>134149537
Okay how do you explain the Romans. I'm fairly certain doesn't get cold enough for you to freeze to death in the winter in Italy except for the Northern mountainous regions

>>134149412
It isn't, he's retarded. Things like diet played a huge role in the evolution of our brains.

File: 1487652262035.jpg (43KB, 570x587px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 570x587px

>>134149537
>Africa by comparison is a place with rich mineral resources that are hard to access without already developed technology
dumb cunt go read some geology b4 shitposting

File: 1489522241868.jpg (84KB, 865x598px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 865x598px

>>134149746
maybe on paper, but not in practice, david wu

>>134149310
>europeans
>raise animals for food and clothing
>develop empathy
>whites are most empathetic race

>asians
>grow rice for food
>become short from planting and picking rice their whole lives
>become smart from engineering terraces into mountains
>eyes chinky from squinting because reflection of the sun off the waters that rice griws in blinding the fuck out of them when they plant/pick rice

>africans
>athletic dark and tall because theyre in the sun on flat prairies and need height to see animals to hunt athletic to be able to chase them all day long

>>134149746
Nope it's because Asia is apparently a frozen wasteland hurrr durrr.

>>134149065
Better questions

If Africa is the cradle of human beings, then how come the middle east is the cradle of civilization?

Supposedly there have been people in Africa the longest, shouldn't they have the oldest civilizations?

maybe neanderthal mixing
i wish we could have unbiased scientists who arent all PC really make us a theory

>>134149065
Widespread Christianity in Europe led to sexual selection favoring self-control, intellegent, desu low-t behavior in our men, and beauty in our women. Widespread monogamy improved the upbringing of the children, and over time created a safe environment for everything.

Its not one thing or another, but over many years of improving our gene pools many of the brutes among us have become genetic dead ends. Of course, after millenia of having a closed genetic environment we are having to start anew, and all progress on that socio-genetic front is set back by each foreigner that joins the pan-western pool.

>>134149756
It doesn't explain shit because it's snownigger nazi centric explanation.

All the civilization simply happened where there was access to water.

>>134149065
Your fundamental problem is assuming other races are human.

>>134149756
They still had to rotate and store crops depending on the season. Thats organization

Also had to deal with vastly different topography, land and sea based threats, etc

>>134150375
>rotating crops
even the injuns knew how to do that

File: 1498366930697.png (17KB, 889x594px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 889x594px

>>134149799

>>134150286
If your a scientist you CAN say different dogs are different breeds with vastly different traits. But if your a scientist you HAVE to say humans with different skin colors from vastly different regions are just different races with the exact same traits

multiple factors

cold weather meant whites needed to prepare for the winter by saving crops, that takes planning
it also meant whites needed to domesticate animals for more food
with those animals domesticated, it made a lot of other things easier

Inuits didn't have the same animals to domesticate

what whites had different from asians is that whites had multiple tribes competing with each other all the time. asians were less individualistic and weren't always competing with each other because tribes weren't usually cut off from each other drastically like Europe

>>134150464
did they develop metallurgy, written language, stone masonry,

nope but they did develop a reclining chair maid out of sticks and rope

File: 1497516893337.jpg (46KB, 853x480px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 853x480px

>>134149684
Inuits only moved to Greenland later. Most of their evolution they lived on the Eurasian continent, around Siberia etc which were warmer zones at that time. Remember that human evolution happens over thousands of years. Inuits have lived around 700 years in extremely cold climate in Greenland. That's the blink of an eye in the evolutionary cycle.

Also the inuits actually ARE quite smart. I mean they have a very sustainable economy and have avoided building the sort of extremely polluting, overpopulated, hypersexualized consumer society that is destroying us while still being relatively modern and not suffering from the sort of short-term idiocy as most of Africa. So they might not shine as "individual successes" but they have achieved quite a lot of civilizational success even with their small numbers.

>>134151875
This is stupid. Scandinavians only had civilization until much later.

Mediterranean population had civilization much earlier. Mesopotamia (which isn't Mediterranean) had civilization early than them.

>>134150753
Whites aren't even the first pastoral nomads you retard. That'd be either Arabs or central Asians.

/pol/ should stop with racial discussions, you look retarded in face of evidence and logic.

>>134149909
>If Africa is the cradle of human beings, then how come the middle east is the cradle of civilization?
Fertile regions led to the earliest massive settlements. Egypt (which is African and Middle Eastern) has the nile river. You can't built pyramids with small or dispersed population.

>Supposedly there have been people in Africa the longest, shouldn't they have the oldest civilizations?
They do. East Africa has some of the oldest civilizations.

File: 6657654.jpg (56KB, 839x720px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 839x720px

>>134152200
>This is stupid. Scandinavians only had civilization until much later.

So? What does that have got to do with anything? I wasn't claiming that having a civilization by itself is a sign of some supreme intelligence, it depends on what kind of a civilization you have. Smarter people organize their society better, as a general rule.

File: image.jpg (197KB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]

197KB, 1200x800px

The one and only reason that Africa got behind was because zebras are unable to be tamed.

t. anthropology professor

>>134149065
Europeans have only surpassed the other races in the last 300-400 years before this they were always behind the middle east or chinese

>>134149310
Europe is far easier to live in than most of Asia

>>134149065
Luck and trade.

>>134149983
Christianity removed sexual selection you idiot. Everyone gets a partner in this system.

>>134153329
This. Asia was demolished and depopulated by the Mongol and tamerlane invasions. Then the silk road died. If it wasn't for this the entirety of Asia would probably still be more advanced than Europe as it has been for several thousand years already. Ancient Greece was a backwater compared to what already existed in the highly urbanised middle east for thousands of years already. Ancient Rome was equals to Persia and China except Rome was built on the back of slavery and looting Europe.

File: chingchong.png (128KB, 581x443px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 581x443px

>>134153662
The silk road was always a meme. Even when it was the most active the trade by sea routes was far more consequential.

File: 1492812299643.png (2MB, 1176x854px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1176x854px

>>134152910

>>134153662
WE

>>134157272
>muh anecdot
He is right tb-h, zebras are unable to be tamed...

File: vegetationeuropeiceage.jpg (182KB, 1159x876px) Image search: [Google]

182KB, 1159x876px

>>134149684
Inuits have "only" inhabited the arctic for 6000 years.
Whites are descendants of Cro-Magnons, who lived in ice age Europe for 60,000.

File: 8-4.jpg (651KB, 1425x900px) Image search: [Google]

651KB, 1425x900px

>>134149684
Also I know fuck all about Inuits other than when they arrived in in Alaska.
Just putting things into scale for you.