Why do liberals rely so much on emotions when arguing? And why do they always resort to ad hominem attacks and labeling their opponents various "-ists?"
Because they lack the intelligence to formulate logical arguments.
>>134133935
Liberalism relies on feel-good ideas of "equality", "fairness", and "morality". That's not to say that the right-wing isn't in favor of our own ideas of equality and morality, but these are based in logical foundations, rather than what feels right at the time. Hence why the same reasoning we used in 1776 is still used today, truths and logic do not change, only emotions do.
To much Yogic philosophy: imagine things into being, with the power of intention. So the fact that the leftists ideas are wrong is irrelevant to them, because they mind wash themselves into thinking if they can create their own reality, regardless of natural laws.
I really hate these tactics and this approach.
Leftist policies are bad in and of themselves. Its not how they're argued or how they're propagated that needs to be pointed out and targeted.
because they're stupid.
>>134133935
Read the rules for radicals, your average libtard doesn't know it, but they have been conditioned to follow those, and once a dog whistle is blown they attack with activists.
>>134133935
Because that is how you win in politics. At least in democracy. You'll notice the left have been winning for like 300 years
>>134136348
Not a leftist. Stating facts
>>134136492
Still a fucking leaf. Fuck off to /v/ and make posts about how you want to see more black transexual people represented in games.