>be me >white anon >first major biology lesson in hs/college

>>134087109
Race is another word for Sub-Species. We didn't descend from modern day Africans, but share a common ancestor and mixed with Neanderthal which was a race of man.

>>134088083
And where would that common ancestor have lived, pray-tell?

>>134088304
Europeans were never modern day Africans who lost their pigment after leaving Africa. The story is more complicated than you are imagining it.

File: Both Modern.jpg (1MB, 1771x1030px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1771x1030px

>>134089335
I understand that, but by definition, if we came from Africa, and our ancestors looked almost indistinguishable from the ancestors of modern Africans, that would, in turn, make us Africans, yes?

>>134089584
No, that would make us all human. Europeans mixed with the Neanderthal race, but we don't consider Neanderthals to be Africans.

File: nigger.jpg (51KB, 974x669px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 974x669px

>>134087109
>believing the evojew
>you're just a meaningless monkey ,goy
>you're an insignificant gnat in a vast and incomprehensible (((universe)))
>You better believe what mister nigger says on (tv) or everyone will think you're not cool

>american education the thread

no wonder you love niggers so much you really are retarded aren't you?

>>134089881
You are so retarded, Europeans have less than 2% Neanderthall admixture, literally making zerl difference at all in the gene pool

File: Screenshot 2017-07-18 at 1.38.02 PM.png (270KB, 484x447px) Image search: [Google]

270KB, 484x447px

>>134087109
its because you whitebois came from an evil nubian wizard who created you to harm the black race and then you went and fucked the neanderthals in europe like the subhuman white monkeys you all are

>>134090139
Explain how your fact contradicts any of my statements and how it makes me retarded.

File: great-ape-mitochondrial-genome-scaledtocanines (1).png (12KB, 770x1998px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 770x1998px

>>134090416
Yeah, no.

>>134090139
It's actually around 4%
Also http://archive.is/5hztc
Basically, nomads aren't from anywhere specific, and we spent 95% of our prehistory just roaming around.
So, no, it's fucking complicated, a ton of shit can happen in thousands/millions of years and we just have kind of an idea about it.

> have a degree in biological anthropology
> specialised in human evolution
> read this thread

Fuck me lads did Andrew anglin teach you biology?

>>134091048
that's just what the white men say so they don't have to face the truth that they are nothing more than subhuman pawns for the african kings

File: European Migrations From Middle East and Steppe _77640634_europe_ancient_farmers_20140917-01.jpg (29KB, 624x380px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 624x380px

>>134091434
If we all originated in Africa why are the non-African races of today so wildly different from Africans? It does kind of seem like aliens dropped different races on the earth from above. Does video related have something to do with it?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vehd7eDlS7o

>>134090139
and chimps are 98% human. that 2% makes a huge different.

>>134092044
This is not an example of "natural selection". Those selected to breed were the genetically flawed and to suggest that behavior was the only flaw would be presumptuous. The "cascade effect" described can be explained as when a defect occurs, there are actually several defects which have occurred. These foxes are not evolved as they do not have an advantage over other foxes other than humans breeding them in a controlled environment.

File: 53041-homo_neanderthalensis.png (202KB, 356x292px) Image search: [Google]

202KB, 356x292px

>>134092044
>what is phenotype
>what is interbreeding

>>134087109
This is because you are stupid.

sage

>>134090139
Read the 10,000 Year Explosion, you stupid fucking goy.

>>134093242
No different than cucked serfs breeding based on religion and social codes.

>>134091583
>lives in first world world that is created by european civilisations
>says they are subhumans when your kind still lives in mud huts like monkies
really makes me think

>>134093315
Interbreeding with what? If they all came out of Africa, why don't Africans look like Asians or Europeans?

>>134094239
Are you suggesting breeding based on religion and social codes didn't take place amongst modern day Africans?

>Scientists analyzing 7.2 million-year-old fossils uncovered in modern-day Greece and Bulgaria suggest a new hypothesis about the origins of humankind, placing it in the Eastern Mediterranean and not -- as customarily assumed -- in Africa, and earlier than currently accepted. The researchers conclude that Graecopithecus freybergi represents the first pre-humans to exist following the split from the last chimpanzee-human common ancestor.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/05/170523083548.htm

>>134094464
I'm asking why Europeans and Asians are nothing like Africans. I would say it came form artificial selection from walled cities, like that trut fox breeding the domesticated foxes. Africans have no such walls and strict social codes.

>>134091583

> african kings

Says the guy from the most widely enslaved race on the planet.

>>134094593
Interesting, the oldest gold stash was in Varna. Very high tech patterning(use of 1.618 perfect ratio) seen in the craftworks.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=260MszIJif4

>>134094667
It came from 1. a high infant/child mortality rate and 2. an over-abundance of food.

Thus, negros are completely R-selected in their behavior. Think of them as a step up from bonobos.

>>134094667
I see what you're saying. People are capable of controlled breeding outside of natural selection, but 5,000 years ago, most Europeans lived just as Africans did.

>>134094667
>why Europeans and Asians are nothing like Africans
They are all separate subspecies evolved from a proto-species and Europeans and Asians mixed with other subspecies of the Proto-Species outside of Africa.

File: moustier1.png (123KB, 296x333px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 296x333px

>>134094306
Neanderthals and denisovans.

>>134095792
t. retardation

Yamnaya tribesmen hunting mammoths and freezing to death en masse in Siberia is very different from Mogumbo chewing bananas all day.

>may 23 2017
http://nypost.com/2017/05/23/this-fossilized-tooth-might-prove-humans-came-from-europe-not-africa/

>>134089335
This.
The "ALL LIFE STARTED IN AFRICA" meme was so misleading

they were more like fucking chimps than zulus

File: Updated HO Family Tree.jpg (2MB, 3000x2974px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3000x2974px

>>134094593
You realize that would place Africans as Europeans as well, yes? This applies to everything after the split (Toumaï, Orrorin, Ardi, Abel, Lucy, Twiggy, Turkana Boy, Heidelberg Man, Modern Man).

>>134098800
WE WUZ EUROPEANS N SHIT

File: 1500098457497.jpg (72KB, 746x853px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 746x853px

>>134099079
Your logic, not mine

>>134088083
DO you think the neanderthals used to shitpost in caves when their race was dying out??

>>134099548
I was meming, the new evidence just shows that the 'everyone is from Africa' hypothesis could be wrong. This doesn't mean that humans 100% originated in Europe as there could still be an uncovered fossil somewhere else in the world.

File: AfroAdam.jpg (216KB, 576x718px) Image search: [Google]

216KB, 576x718px

>>134100276
Not really, considering that shit is as old as Toumaï. Modern man did originate in Africa, though it was most likely a pan-African (all over Africa) origin as opposed to one portion as was originally thought.

>>134099559
I love the shitposting from Pompeii. I guess it's in our genes

>>134100648
"The lower jaw, nicknamed 'El Graeco' by the scientists, has additional dental root features, suggesting that the species Graecopithecus freybergi might belong to the pre-human lineage. "We were surprised by our results, as pre-humans were previously known only from sub-Saharan Africa," said Jochen Fuss, a Tübingen PhD student who conducted this part of the study.

Furthermore, Graecopithecus is several hundred thousand years older than the oldest potential pre-human from Africa, the six to seven million year old Sahelanthropus from Chad. The research team dated the sedimentary sequence of the Graecopithecus fossil sites in Greece and Bulgaria with physical methods and got a nearly synchronous age for both fossils -- 7.24 and 7.175 million years before present."

File: Greek Chimp.jpg (157KB, 547x302px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 547x302px

>>134101366
I meant modern man, as in homo sapiens, not a 7 mya ape at the base of our collective family tree. Here's the actual study:
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0177127&fullSite
>Furthermore, it shows features that point to a possible phylogenetic affinity with hominins. G. freybergi uniquely shares p4 partial root fusion and a possible canine root reduction with this tribe and therefore, provides intriguing evidence of what could be the oldest known hominin.

It doesn't imply direct relation, but it points to hominins being more widespread than previously thought. However, I do think they kay be jumping the gun in claiming it's a direct ancestor, same goes for sahelanthropus, orrorin, anoiapithecus, and even oreopithecus. Let's also not forget the whole ramapithecus kerfuffle.

File: bushman-hunter-tsumkwe-namibia-e07b1g.jpg (68KB, 640x472px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 640x472px

>>134087109
Bushmen are closest to our common ancestors. Nigger hair, but paler skin and flatter face.

>>134087109

Caucasids, Mongoloids. Negroids. Seperate.

>>134098800
It would prove that race mixing with african apes has always been wrong.

>>134102464
Also, there's this.
https://evolutionistx.wordpress.com/2017/07/05/no-graecopithecus-does-not-prove-humans-evolved-in-europe/