Did you see the new Zizek, /pol/?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_kNvse5v9k
He destroys the "migrant conspiracy" completely, claiming that everyone who thinks any of the population replacement was planned is retarded, and praises his best friend Alain Badiou for adopting two African kids.
Also, he's very sad about Hillary not winning.
And he sees the new fusion of capitalism and communism (worst of both) as a natural historical fact that we must live with. He also repeats the lies about cops killing black people in America all the time.
What the hell happened to him, seriously?
>>134076343
>What the hell happened to him, seriously?
He was always a communist shithead and even dumber than Noam Chomsky?
>>134076343
>a slimy shuddering communist piece of shit is retarded
He was never good. He thinks every killing in the French Revolution was justified because the Jacobins said so.
>>134076454
>>134076783
He used to be pretty reasonable on lots of common sense issues though, he only turned into a full-on globalist shill recently. Maybe it's finally time to settle the debt, so to speak.
>>134076343
Fuck this retard communist dipshit.
>>134076343
He's a marxist fraud, why are you surprised?
He should stick to comedy and his "philosophy" and stop being an embarrassment to our nation and country
>>134076942
hes probably a rape baby of yours hence retarded
>>134076343
It's not a conspiracy though. Conspiracies are hidden from public view. The replacement of European people is very public and has been for years. The reasons for it have just all been lies.
>>134076343
Zizek is an interesting case. While I find his political views pathetic and misguided, he has a sharp mind for philosophy and wrote at least one extremely good book (Tarrying with the Negative). It's been sad to see his slow decline over the past 15 years or so, with books increasingly just re-hashing old concepts and silly public appearances like this one becoming prioritized as his "stardom" got to his head.
>>134076343
Okay but it's factual that the population replacement was planned though. We have Jews talking about it going back decades.
This is not debatable. It is a fact that this was an intentional act to undermine national unity. Simply saying it isn't true isn't an argument. The facts are not on his side here. It's very funny that he accuses Chomsky of being "empirically wrong" about great crimes in history when he is now making an empirically false statement.