The notion that Europeans are somehow bearing a disproportionate

>>134040707

Fuck up you filthy shitskin

Yeah but putting poop in the toilet is fine just not on your kitchen

>>134040938
Geeze...

>>134040707
ocean of piss, etc

do those countries have gibs?

I cant find Saudi Arabia in the list! I thought you break it you buy it?

europe shouldn't bear any of the brunt.

>>134040707
Define brunt.

The idea that placing Muslims in Muslims countries is somehow less destructive than placing Muslims in European countries is pretty dumb famalam.

>>134041323
*more destructive

>>134040707
So if you want Europe to look like any of those fine countries, like Chad, keep inviting them in

>>134040707
*5. Poland (1,000,000)
Only they have Ukrainian refugees

>>134040707
USA: 35,000,000 Mexicans alone

>>134040707
Yeah - their literal neighbors and the ones who should be taking the brunt of the economic opportunism.
(Because that's what it is)

File: 1481174299697.jpg (6KB, 248x247px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 248x247px

>>134040707
>i trust the source of these numbers

>>134040707
You have no idea how bad things really are.
The majority of the white population exist in Europe and America. Other ethnic populations far exceeds whites. If you start importing millions of non-white people to Europe and America, and their birth rate is higher than the native population, white people will inevitably be replaced. Interracial breeding with whites and non-whites will contribute to this replacement. Eventually whites will become minority or possibly bred out and become extinct. It doesn't matter if 80% of refugees were still living in their own countries, that's 20% in the millions which will still add to the problem of white displacement.

How is this so hard to understand?

Please kill yourself OP

>>134040707
When those countries start taking in non-Muslim migrants in significant numbers, then you can tell lecture White people.

Pls pls kill yourself

>>134040707

European countries are civilized, so of course they're going to be far more adversely affected by migrants than countries which are already shitholes

The notion that Europeans have somehow a moral duty to bear any brunt of the refugee crisis is empirically and measurably false.

The first role of a government is to protect its people. Rapefugees come with a non-zero absolute increase in violent crime (per capita doesn't matter, because they are not citizens and a just government must protect their own citizens before anyone else).

Rapefugees also have higher reproduction rates, which is dangerous to native people who are already minority groups on the world scale.

Africa is now free of evil colonialists so current Africans live in much better conditions than their parents who were kept down by whitey. Refugee apologists need to chill, they're just fine where they are.

>>134040707
Jordan's the only halfway moral country in the middle-east. Too bad they've been taking refugees in for two decades and are starting to hit a breaking point where they physically can't care for them anymore.

They've got nice taste in tanks though. Leo 1's with modified turrets.

Those countries are taking in other Niggers or Muslims who are like them. So it's Not the same as what is going on in Europe. I Would gladly take in White women refugees from Ukraine