http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art icle-4700260/Porn-sites-

>>133970784
How the fuck would they even do that?
It's impossible to prove that shit online unless they're gathering SS numbers or some shit.

Britbongs pls explain this shit

>>133971119
their brilliant idea is that all porn sites should ask for credit card info, since only 18+yo can get credit cards.

>>133970784
We aren't but the government have loads of cash to spend on the police and they don't really have any better use for it so they are coming up with these things just to get rid of it.

>>133971503
Well I'm sure this won't lead to rampant abuse at all.
good thing credit card theft isn't a thing that exists.

But I thought Western governments wanted their people to be degenerate.

>>133971849
These are the conservatives. They don't. It's leftists wanting people to be degenerate, conservatives want people to behave like in Downtown Abbey.

>>133971849
less porn -> more white men interacting with woman -> more situations that can be called rape -> white men can be painted as more evil -> more woman switch to refugees

File: 1460380278296.jpg (130KB, 766x864px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 766x864px

>>133970784
>Why are Britbongs are more concerned about porn, rather than dealing with known terrorists in UK?
how will your population care about real problems like terrorism and child sex gangs when you keep directing their attention to non-issues like porn

>>133971980
These are "big C" conservatives, they would qualify as democrats in America, they're banning porn probably because it fits May's feminist agenda.

Not that I disagree with it, porn is ruining young men.