This is what I've found:
I am being monintored by a number of people working for (((think tanks))) and the national secuirty apparachek
What especially seems to trigger the kikes (based on traffic that I can monitor) are quotes from Dostoevsky, Gogol, Tolstoy, the former greatness of Russian Lit, Ezra Pound, and whenever I write something myself that goes into tradition or Eastern Orthodox Christianity or something.
Really odd. I wonder what I could do to make them take me out?
>>133805322
>i am being monitored
whaaaaaaa, crazy shiiieet brah. Take a load of your mind and have a refreshing Monster Energy Zero Ultra
>make public statements
>are monitored
there are looking for ways to shame your company/friends companies to extract money from share price change
>>133806988
>Those digits
(nervous) heh--
Yeah, but I don't have money, and they can't pin anything on me legitimately. I leave it hazy like Peterson.
what have you been posting
>>133807760
Extremely redpilled yet subtle quotes by Ezra Pound, Soltzy, Dostoevsky, Chekhov on the jews etc.
>>133805322
>>133807946
example quotes please
>>133805322
What's the point in that? If you want people to become redpilled with random quotes then I'd suggest Facebook. Are you employed? Linkedin is for professional networking.
Interdasting...
>>133808078
yes please.
Also this seems like an interesting experiment!
>>133805322
Don't poke the wasps.
Make a bunch of shitposting linkedin accounts
>>133808078
so much this
>>133805322
pls how did you get so many contax thnx :)
>>133814977
>>133808078
https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/54319/canto-xlv
http://www.eldritchpress.org/ac/gentfriend.htm
>>133815771
You just ask.
>>133811178
I made contacts with hundreds of generals and high level officers in the US military. I plan on redpilling who actually matters.
Taking risks is fine but taking foolish risks is better.
Use linkedIn to climb the corporate ladder/whatever social hierarchy you are in, and redpill irl those under you. It's much easier.
Also remember that redpill it's just a word. The true process of redpilling is more like making cracks in someone's beliefs and then start hammering with a wedge until everything breaks down.
How stable is your job? How important is your position?
The only thing I can think of is to always keep plausible deniability on those quotes, if you really need to keep that up. Good luck
>>133820062
meant to say taking calculated risks srry
>>133820062
Yeah my name is a bit fuzzy and I've fuzzed it further. I'm taking semi precautions, but I'm sort of curious also how they'd murder me. My job is somewhat important, but the contacts I have are on the highest levels. Naval commanders. Airmen. Senators. Powerful Lobbyists. Congressmen.
>>133820448
Sort of curious? I'm not sure that is the best mindset...
I don't have much experience in these kind of games, but from what I've seen here in Italy they can, among others:
-Promote you and remove you. They basically thank you for your hard work and put you in charge in some minor branch somewhere inconsequential
-wing clipping. They don't call you anymore for important jobs or projects.
-The first crysis that happens they blame you. Very obvious i guess.
You should wait for some other smart anons, maybe they can give you some ideas. Anyway I think lobbyists and politician are already kinda redpilled, they have access to so much information. Don't they just happen to have a personal agenda to follow?
btw pic attached is what I was thinking when I wrote about plausible deniability.
>>133805322
Nice. LinkedIn is ripe for the red pill, and those targets actually have money and influence to do something potentially.
Just keep well within the line so that mods/admins really have to think hard about banning you.