Do you think that Donnie Trump Jr. will be bottom or top bitch in prison? Or will he get his own cell because he's the President son (assuming his dad lasts that long)?
>>133798356
What crime did he commit?
>>133798356
If he ever goes to prison it all depends how he handles himself.
Situation 1.
>Don walks in and smacks the fuck out of the biggest nigger he sees, because don knows that niggers cant help but find that submissive genetic trait in the face of such white pride
Situation 2
>Don goes to prison and goes gay for the stay
>>133798418
18 U.S.C. § 201
Election defrauding and conspiracy to commit espionage.
>>133798356
Mind Rape Media (MRM) is trying to Mind Rape America into a shallow grave
don't even accept an inch of the Russia Freak conspiracy theory
>>133798356
he'll be neither because he wont go to jail :^)
>>133799433
Someone clearly doesn't know what espionage or opposition research means
>>133798418
>What crime did he commit?
Not being a registered Democrat.
Because this is the shit they do all the time.
Donnie dindu nuffin
Donnie good boy
>>133799433
Lol 2/10. Practice your bullshit more on cuckit sweetie
>>133798356
rich people dont go to prison moron
>>133799848
Can you explain to me how this isn't a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 201? Someone is going to go to jail in the Trump family.
>>133799889
so execution it is, then? Just like the Rosenbergs.
>>133798356
His father can just pardon him.
>tfw he'd just get pardoned by POTUS Trump
lmao
>>133798356
Liberals used to be funny but now they're turning into pure cringe.
>>133798418
He didn't recognize OPs gender.
>>133800346
Do you know what precedent is? Do you know how law works?
>>133800346
Nobody in the Trump family was a public official or a witness at the time. 18 USC 201 does not apply.
>>133800516
>Liberals
Really should change their name.
>Not liberal at all.
>Fascists
>Radical Communists
>The most hate filled violent party ever known to American politics
>Also bigoted
>Liars
Maybe just call their party "Satan's Spawn"
>>133800191
...which would be Trumps, as they thought that colluding with a foreign government is not a clear violation of Federal law and a felony.
>>133800238
You're wrong. The Dems turnt down Soviet aid to bring down Nixon in the past during elections:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/07/13/donald-trump-is-wrong-when-democrats-were-offered-secret-help-by-the-soviets-they-refused/?utm_term=.46b6960e881e
>>133800904
Archive shills https://archive.is/grEll
>>133798356
He didn't break any law. Even if he did, he'd just plead guilty and Trump would pardon him.
Why is the left not funny?
Their memes are awful and don't make any sense.
>>133800904
Tell us, when is the arrest happening?
>>133801003
>Be Donnie.
>Get convicted of a crime.
>Oh wait my dad is the president!
>Get pardoned.
Wow fucking liberals I swear.
Why does he and his kids look like spics?
>>133800904
Collusion is only a illegal if an actual law was broken. In this case, no laws were broken.
Also, talking to Russians is not a felony.
Care to cite the statute?
>>133800904
>washingtonpost.
Who reads that propaganda filled rag?
Besides you liberal dimwits.
Nixon?
You fuckers owe Nixon an apology after giving us Bil Clinton, Hillary and King Nigger.
Talk about corruption.
>>133800948
Fuck off.
>>133798356
I think you're a bottom now, anon. Go fucking dream about DT Jr and wish you could get it
>>133800904
LOL brock finally got you your cheat sheets! (((Nice))) try faggots. Tick fucking tock.
"When The Left Longed For Russian Political Interference To stop Ronald Reagan in 1984, Ted Kennedy reached out to the Soviet Union"
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2006/oct/27/20061027-084248-4386r/
http://www.thedailybeast.com/when-the-left-longed-for-russian-political-interference
GWU Law Prof. Jonathan Turley on Trump Jr. Meeting A Russian: "For The Love Of God... This Is Not Treason... No Crime Was Committed!"
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/07/11/gwu_law_prof_jonathan_turley_on_trump_jr_meeting_a_russia_for_the_love_of_god_this_is_not_treason.html
>>133800821
>"Whoever . . . being a public official or person SELECTED to be a public official, DIRECTLY or INDIRECTLY, . . . agrees to receive or accept anything of value . . . for any other person or entity, in return for . . . being influenced to commit or aid in committing, or to COLLUDE IN, or allow, any fraud, or make opportunity for the commission of ANY fraud, on the United States . . . shall be fined under this title or not more than three times the monetary equivalent of the thing of value, whichever is greater, or imprisoned for not more than fifteen years, or both, and may be disqualified from holding any office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States."
Hammerschmidt, which was applied specifically to 18 USC 371 and defined "defraud" (i.e., commit fraud).:
>To conspire to defraud the United States means primarily to cheat the Government out of property or money, but it also means to interfere with or obstruct one of its lawful governmental functions by deceit, craft or trickery, or at least by means that are dishonest. It is not necessary that the Government shall be subjected to property or pecuniary loss by the fraud, but only that its legitimate official action and purpose shall be defeated by misrepresentation, chicane or the overreaching of those charged with carrying out the governmental intention.
also 42 U.S.C. Section 1985(3): which says:
>If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire... or more persons conspire to prevent by force, intimidation, or threat, any citizen who is lawfully entitled to vote, from giving his support or advocacy in a legal manner, toward or in favor of the election of any lawfully qualified person as an elector for President or Vice President, or as a Member of Congress of the United States; or to injure any citizen in person or property on account of such support or advocacy
>>133801524
Umm no, sweetie. Tick fucking tock.
"When The Left Longed For Russian Political Interference To stop Ronald Reagan in 1984, Ted Kennedy reached out to the Soviet Union"
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2006/oct/27/20061027-084248-4386r/
http://www.thedailybeast.com/when-the-left-longed-for-russian-political-interference
GWU Law Prof. Jonathan Turley on Trump Jr. Meeting A Russian: "For The Love Of God... This Is Not Treason... No Crime Was Committed!"
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/07/11/gwu_law_prof_jonathan_turley_on_trump_jr_meeting_a_russia_for_the_love_of_god_this_is_not_treason.html
>>133801524
Did Don Jr. practice journalism without a license? Because getting dirt on people is basically journalism.
Nobody was preventing people from voting.
None of that applies.
>>133801672
>2 rubles have been deposited In your account.
Fuck off shill.
>>133801149
see >>133801524
They committed conspiracy to commit election defraudment
>>133801511
your second link article is right. It isn't treason. But it is another Federal crime that can get applied here.
>>133802026
Election defraudment? Like the media outlets were doing when they dished dirt on Trump prior to the election? Funny.
>>133801954
colluding with a foreign government in support of your candidate to get information they obtained to discredit your opponent is a crime. Said government was under Federal sanctions, and our recent Congress (run by Republicans themselves) have still upheld those sanctions.
>>133802310
Please cite the statute which says this.
>>133798356
He's a Trump. He'll have two bottoms, obviously. But for real. Don jr. ain't going to prison.
>>133800948
We are not worthy. Shine on you crazy archiving diamond.
>>133802310
you idiotic niggers tried to set him up with a fucking Democrat flunkie and a fucking American
Don Jr. is the target of your bullshit because you tried and failed to get dirt on daddy
also your posting style hasn't changed since i called you out yesterday
>>133803102
i wasn't shit-posting yesterday, but I'm glad someone else is doing my job for me.
>>133802026
Defraudment only applies if the information is ficticious. If the information is valid then it's just information.
Otherwise that implies that it's okay to elect someone who's a massive criminal as long as you don't get the information about it. Otherwise it's defraudment.
>>133803720
>Defraudment
>implying a liberal can understand what is honest or dishonest.