WE.
WUZ.
SPACE.
VIKANGZ.
hAHAHahah oh man you don't actually believe in the moon missions do you?
Gif related, it's what spacecucks believe.
>>133531848
i believe them. also within ten years we will have warp drive and will begin exploring the galaxy. i'm looking forward to breeding with a 10/10 vulcan q.t to make a human/vulcan master race hybrid. i believe justin trudeau should lead our one world government
>>133531848
>Not A Space Agency
>Never A Straight Answer
>National Academy of Space Actors
>Need Another Seven Astronauts
>Not Another Stupid Acronym
Fae News since 1958
>>133532418
If you can look at that video and see no problems then you have problems.
Sure we will have a Warp Drive.... just like all the private Space companies that have promised to put a man into space and their due dates for that have expired.. just like NASA has put dates to go back to the moon or Mars that always get canceled or pushed back again.
In 10 years they will be saying 10 years for a warp dirve.
>>133532714
>If you can look at that video and see no problems then you have problems.
You do know they had drones then, right?
>>133532714
please explain what is wrong
>>133532714
>If you can look at that video and see no problems then you have problems.
What exactly is wrong with the video exactly?
>>133532851
No shit. How do you think Russia was able to put a laser reflector on the moon without sending a manned mission? Drones arent exotic technology.
I don't see what Drones have to do with the faked moon landing missions.
>>133533182
It was a joke to explain the absurd camera movement. Take it easy. I know it's all fake.
entering the moon surface is forbidden by them thats why most of the footage was faked.
>>133533021
>>133533165
https://youtu.be/sj6a0Wrrh1g?t=171
Watch it for yourself.
It looks extremely fake. Not only the take off but the background seems fake. The takeoff seems like its pulled by a wire harness.
ALong with all the other proof of fake moon landings like moon rocks originating from anarctica. Never going back in 50 years for the meme excuse of already done. The test footage of the lander crashing right before the Apollo misisions and the lander looking really really chintzy. The intersecting shadows, and no dust on the footpads of the lander but dust footprints inches from the lander.
>>133533926
Why would you trust images from people who have already lied to you?
Who knows if that's real or not. You certainly don't.
>>133534500
there is aliens on the moon, they don't allow visitors. thats a fact.
>>133531848
lol who filmed that? did they leave him there?
SO how do you fucking morons explain the physics on the moon then?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDp1tiUsZw8
LET ME GUESS
Stanley Kubric changed the laws of physics to help fake a landing...
SpaceX and NASA gonna be offering trips around the moon at low orbits in the next couple years. Lets send all the non-believes...and leave them there.
>>133535249
its a remote camera, ya dingus
>>133534340
NASA Mooned America , book by ( Rene' )
I never could understand how 2 guys with huge suits and bacpacks could even fit in the tiny LEM.
Proportions all wrong. And why the fuck cant we pictures of the landing site. from earth or space based cameras , or Lunar orbiters ? Scam.
>>133536134
Because we do have pictures. Just because you're too lazy to look doesn't mean they don't exist.
>>133536713
most are faked
>>133534340
>"Yes I've been to the moon before so I know how a take off from there looks like", the post
>>133531848
Whats wrong with this video? Looks pretty realistic to me
>>133531848
>17% earth's gravity
>>133535518
lmao no replies
also the japenese found the exact point of the landing so it couldn't have been faked: http://global.jaxa.jp/press/2008/05/20080520_kaguya_e.html
>>133535557
oh really? can you prove it cletus?
>>133531848
If the moon landing was fake, Soviets would have called bullshit within a minute. Checkmate, cunt.
>>133532418
>10/10 vulcan q.t
Implying they won't breed with Klingon Chads. They say they like logical guys but in bed they just want to be dominated by the BKC.
REEEEEEEEEEE
>>133533926
>>133534735
NASA hoax ISS Actornaut Chris Cassidy accidentaly admits they are filming in the USA BUSTED
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jp9Y8I6v_Ds
Nasa admits humans can't pass through the dangerous Van Allen Belts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IDBBUwdyz4I
Then whose house is this on Phobos?
>>133539538
Absolutely this.
Also, what about the rocket that took off?
>>133532418
>within ten years we will have warp drive and will begin exploring the galaxy
Getting a man on Mars is NASA's goal for the next thirty years. What makes you think we can go from that to exploring the galaxy in only ten?
Man is frail...the thermosphere is as far as you'll go.
>>133539036
>>133535249
You're the reason people think we're niggers.
>>133539538
No.
>>133546129
What about it?
>>133548336
Total fuck up. Where did it go wrong? Can you figure it out?
>>133531848
They left the camera guy? How come he was already there before Neil got out of the craft? Wouldn't that make him the first man to walk on the moon?
>>133539538
makes sense to me
>>133549621
The camera on the lunar rover could be remotely controlled
It's so fucking fake that it makes the general public look 1000x more hapless than they already do.
>>133532675
Here here! Keep red pill ing. Repeat after me. The earth map is the United Nations Logo. Stop the madness and stop believing we live on a spinning
1000mph fkng ball?!!! Shits smaking you in your face its so obvious ly fake and Nassholes keep on laughing at you and taking your money! Nasa is just a arm of our govt defense dept. all fake propaganda.
Note; space shuttle has jet engines on the back of the plane. It is Not a glider but a jet plane faking reentry back to our fake ball. Go to you tube and watch. Everything is fake!!!! Wake up faggots!
>>133542908
NASA didn't admit anything there. It's just one guy taken somewhat out of context.
"Radiation was not an operational problem during the Apollo Program. Doses received by the crewmen of Apollo missions 7 to 15 were small because no major solar-particle events occurred during those missions. One small event was detected by a radiation sensor outside the Apollo 12 spacecraft, but no increase in radiation to the crewmen inside the spacecraft was detected." - NASA Technical Note, 1973 (TN D-7080)