Explain to me why net neutrality is bad. I don't see how

>>133471812
The internet was fine in 2015 before the government used a late 1800s law about railroads to regulate it.

I don't get why people on plebbit are freaking out

>>133471812
It's not bad. Only retarded anclaps and paid shills think it's bad.

File: 1484365040466.jpg (473KB, 2144x1308px) Image search: [Google]

473KB, 2144x1308px

>Net Neutrality is good because it says Neutral
>Affordable Care Act is good because it says Affordable
>t. leftist

if the ISPs wanted to, they could charge you more money across the board right now. This is not their goal. Their goal is to charge places like netflix money to reflect the gigantic amount of your pipe that they suck up, something they cannot do currently.

>>133472449
This.

You aren't going to see a price increase, but places like Google, Facebook or Netflix that use unfathomable amounts of data at their network headquarters will be charged.

At the moment you're subsidising all these megacorps with your monthly internet bill, and they're trying to convince you that it's fair.

>>133471812

It doesn't matter to anyone but USA

Foreign governments aren't bound to the 1st, so there's no point if you're a foreigner.

File: team neutrality.png (793KB, 1829x535px) Image search: [Google]

793KB, 1829x535px

Whatever "net neutrality" is we need the opposite of it

>>133472740

I know that. In fact Brazil has alredy stated laws protecting net neutrality in the recent years.

My concern is basically this >>133472920 though.

I'm surprised there aren't many shills around at this time

>>133471812

Need to read the package.

>>133471812
Who do you trust more not to fuck up your freedoms: government or big business?

Thats the simplified version of this issue.

>>133472276
This.