Why do you still support Trump when he panders to the corporate

>>133448515
Ron Paul opposes net neutrality

>>133448515
I don't give a shit what the rich do. All I want is lower tax and jews to fuck off. Bernie is a jew so he needs to fuck off.

>>133448515
>ron paul
>supporting net neutrality

>>133448515
BECAUSE

I'M TIRED of paying for everyone else's medicaid by them taking a percent of my trading profits.

I'M TIRED of giving people pell grants, when they should get a fucking job or two to go to school, why should people graduate in four years anyway? If you're not smart enough to make enough fucking money to survive in America you're fucking retarded.

I'M TIRED of fly over states getting fucking good stamps.

I DONT GIVE A FUCK about coal miners or any other idiot, I want them to stop taking my fucking money.

>>133448985
>>133448825
Okay maybe not on that specific issue on net neutrality but you get the idea.

>>133449285
How do you even fuck up this badly? In one sentence you claim to support net neutrality and then you say you support Ron Paul.

You don't deserve to live.

>>133449358
Maybe because I'm not a one issue person, anon. I still support Ron Paul.

File: 1.png (50KB, 1880x342px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 1880x342px

We're not going to oppose net neutrality just because sanders was in favor of it, idiot shills. Not everyone here is a fucking ideologue.

Literally a new anti-net neutrality thread every fucking time I refresh the front page.

Has anyone taken a look at the fucking catalog, it's insane how much they're spamming this shit.

>>133448515
Ron paul refused to endorse Romney when he was cheated.

Commie Sanders fully endorsed, and campaigned after being cheated. Even though Jill Stein shared 95 percent similar positions.

Fuck off comparing them. Paul has principles, Sanders is a cukk for the establishment.

File: 1493788560480.jpg (16KB, 287x395px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 287x395px

>>133448515
>Sanders
>trustworthy
>Jewish

>>133449478
>I still support Ron Paul.

Then you're against net neutrality. Cool. I'm glad we settled that little disagreement.

You can leave now.

Bernie Sanders is a piece of shit. He owns three houses and has the nerve to talk down to small business owners who barely make six figures and then has the nerve to tell them they should provide health insurance to their employees. Bernie has no understanding of economics, and therefore shouldn't be taken seriously. Everything that comes out of his mouth is pure lunacy

File: lib-cucks.jpg (194KB, 2200x1260px) Image search: [Google]

194KB, 2200x1260px

>>133448899

Your views are (pic related)

Libertarians are useful idiots for big business.

>>133448515
Sanders himself wasnt even planning on winning you idiot. He was there to make a profit, while being controlled opposition to Clinton.

>>133448515
Because much of /pol/ doesn't really give a crap about economic issues, they just want to feel like they're winning the culture war.

Plus net neutrality is a shit idea to begin with, don't give the internet to the state.

>>133448515
>lobbyist groups who control NN aren't already corporate fucks

>>133449832
>>133449832
>He was there to make a profit, while being controlled opposition to Clinton.
LOL, no. If he was controlled opposition he would have done less well. He did well enough to actually hurt Clinton.

File: 1499278296695 (1).jpg (51KB, 960x852px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 960x852px

>>133448515
>muh commie Bernie

Kill yourself, Reddit.

>>133449639
>...
Doing good work there leaf

>>133449740
Not really. In the grand scale of things and rather than choosing the shill Romney I would still have voted for ron paul.
No person is perfect anon

>>133448899
The corporate fucks are trying to take advantage of you AGAIN AND STILL you continue to support Drumpf.

File: 1461727274472.jpg (127KB, 909x926px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 909x926px

>>133449963
>He did well enough to actually hurt Clinton

>>133448515
Sanders is a socialist, and while they love to blow rainbows out of their asses about protecting the little man, it always means government control, equality in poverty, and the super rich sitting pretty.

>>133449963
>hurt Clinton

he lost.Just like he was supposed to all along.

>>133450065
>I would still have voted for ron paul.

And he would have eliminated net neutrality, just like Trump.

What is the problem here mate? I don't understand. Are you retarded?

>>133450065
Maybe if you quit referring to the God Emperor as Drumpf, maybe we would take you seriously.

>>133448515
>Trusting politicians to do what they say during the campaign

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>133448515
>Sanders
Literally who?

>>133449541
Yeah they're spamming constantly

>>133448515

All of my clients are 1%ers.

I like when they have money to pay me with. Maybe I'll leave you a tip next time I'm at McDonalds.

>>133448985
>>133449358
>>133449541
>>133449575
>>133449614
>>133449639
>>133449667
>>133449702
>>133449740
>>133449911
Based Canucks that actually understand the bullshit of Net Neutrality better than liberal nothing burgers

>>133450198
>Are you retarded?
He is a Democrat, so yes.

>sanders wanted to keep the "corporate fucks" who made the Internet what it is, out of it
Yup, sounds like a communist bag of shit.

>>133450134
>>133450174
Yes, he lost. But he dragged Clinton down a bit, maybe by enough of a margin that it allowed Trump to get elected. Sanders' populism and anti-rich rhetoric made Clinton's careful calculation and friendship with wealthy entities stand out in contrast.

>>133450198
>only one issue determines your entire choice
Then there would be no candidate for you to choose from, stupid leaf.

Except maybe if he/she changes his stance every 5 seconds, in that case yeah I now know why you voted for Drumpf or Hillary.

Op is mad cause no refunds policy

File: 1499896383715m.jpg (116KB, 1024x630px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 1024x630px

>>133448515
Why not convert already

>>133448515
>Implying Sanders was a real candidate to begin with
You got scammed faggot. Bernie was never a real option.

>>133449812
>as if the enemy was ever all rich people

>>133448515
>waahhh 1%, occupy wallstreet!
>pic is a 1%er who is corrupt as fuck, does bank fraud, and sells his soul to hillary for a few bucks.

truly, wtf? your team doesn't stand a chance

Reminder that Sanders was only candidate to tell AIPAC to fuck off

“If we are going to go forward, it cannot be that the United States just takes the side of Israel.”
https://shadowproof.com/2016/03/22/bernie-sanders-declines-pander-israel-lobby-aipac-speech/

>>133448515
I swear if I have to see this idiots fugly face one more time. Libtards couldn't have at least picked someone to go full dickhard over who didn't give cancer to anyone who looked at him?

File: 8_compressed.png (3MB, 951x3535px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 951x3535px

>>133450324
Just look at this shit

They're spamming like crazy right now.

>>133449285
That specific issue is the reason you posted this. This is why I oppose you, Bernie Sanders, and all leftists. Your inability to grasp the importance of specificity makes you unfit to run a hotdog stand. You are far more than unfit to run a hotdog stand. You are that much less fit to run a civilization.

>>133448515

>Sanders was the /pol/ "Ron Paul" candidate and you blew it. Fuck you cucks.

>Who stabbed him in the back again?
>Who planned to fuck him over from the very start?
>Who threatened him into obedience?

Tell me again anon, was it the Liberals or the Republicans?

File: Tumblr_nrawepF7XG1smho41o1_1280.jpg (175KB, 1024x682px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 1024x682px

Repent my child, and thou shalt be saved

>>133450760
It was either that or remain in obscurity. It was a gamble to get attention. He's been saying the same shit for years and years but nobody gave a shit since he was an independent until he challenge Hillary. Quite sad. The DNC is not going to back him in 2020, he'll just go back into obscurity.

>>133448515
Why would you support Sanders? All he ever does is pander to an unfounded sense of entitlement.

Everything he suggests is increasing government power to steal from others to give to the people in charge.

>>133448515
>trump panders to poor rednecks
>trump panders to the 1%
so which is it

>>133448515
sure. i'll trust him
with Jews you win!

File: jill.stein.bernie.jpg (316KB, 1008x978px) Image search: [Google]

316KB, 1008x978px

bernie is being investigated for misuse of campaign funds

no refunds sweetie ;)

>>133448899
>don't tread on me (jews excluded)
Fuck you.

>>133451154
He tells the poor rednecks what they want to hear but then does things that will benefit the 1%. Not that that's necessarily a bad thing. I'm planning to become part of the 1%.

>>133448515
Bernie and his cunt are going down, faggot. I can't wait for you summer niggers to go back to Oberlin.

File: some_people_just_want_to_watch_the_right_wing_world_to_BURN.png (100KB, 1253x401px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 1253x401px

>>133448899
>I don't give a shit what the rich do

>What's directly above the OP's post

I don't give a shit what those who are against Net Neutrality do. If it means /pol/ - and the Alt-Shite's precious 'Safe Space(s)' like it everywhere else - cease to exist, all I want is to watch the right-wing world BURN.

>>133451154
Rednecks who vote red in the southeast are gullible. Why do you think these red states are dirt poor compared to the rest of the US? Because they keep voting republican, which is against their interests

IT'S LITERALLY THIS SIMPLE:
BANDWIDTH IS A LIMITED RESOURCE

"OPEN INTERNET" PRETENDS IT ISN'T BY FORCING COMPANIES TO CHARGE THE SAME PRICE FOR ALL LEVELS OF BANDWIDTH CONSUMPTION (current title II classification bans traffic controlling)
>muh equality

THIS FUCKS OVER YOUR INTERNET
AMERICAN INTERNET SPEEDS ARE FUCKED BECAUSE OF THIS
OLIGOPOLY IS SUSTAINED BY THIS

STOP BEING LEFTISTS
STOP CRYING FOR BIG BROTHER GOVERNMENT TO SAVE YOU FROM RISK

The pursuit of happiness, people. You need to be able to get a booboo once in a while if you want to ride bikes like the pros.

>>133451591
>tfw remembering there are people who unironically believe the right have safe spaces

>>133451591
>>133452307
They don't have safe spaces, but /pol/ is too much of a satire that it starts to look like one. And the gullible idiots look at this site and start to believe the bullshit the alt right spews on the daily.

Of course Drumpf loves that.

File: laughing_jeremy_corbyn.jpg (331KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

331KB, 1920x1080px

>>133451553
>Bernie
>going down

Nige FaRAGE probably said the same about Jeremy Corbyn last month.

Theresa May Not is now a Dead Woman Walking, bleeding taxpayer's money to inferior subhuman fundie potato-brain homophobe terrorist-lovers in Northern Ireland purely to keep her politically alive for a few more months, UKRAP are dead: as is FaRAGE's 'Hard' Brexit, thus is effectively no 'Brexit' at all, and Jeremy CorWIN walks on water

A strange 'Going Down' for the left-wing, eh? The left-wing Labour is now ultra-credible, with a Money Tree that are the subhuman Donald Fart-esque '1%' in the tax havens a Labour government can bleed, and your 'Emprah' is fucked by the Watergate-esque 'Smoking Gun Tapes' that are those e-mails.

As Corbyn is now ultra-credible, therefore Sanders is.

'Going Down'? Yeah. Wiggy's credibility, along with all you inferior subhuman Alt-Shitists.

>>133452046
You're only half right.
Republicans raise taxes for war/veterans/protectionism, Democrats raise taxes for welfare/education/environmentalism.

The difference is the republicans at least try to hide it by saying they're the small government party. You're kind don't even pretend to be sensible.

File: IMG_2169.png (572KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

572KB, 1280x720px

> a commie is the libertarian candidate

>>133452486
>inferior subhuman fundie potato-brain homophobe terrorist-lovers in Northern Ireland
Gesundheit

>>133448515
God you sounds like you're 16

>Sanders wanted to...
>Sanders wanted to...
>Obama wants to..
>Ron wants to...


We all had our first hopeful political crush.

>>133449541
>>133449575
>>133449614
>>133449667
>>133449702
>>133450324

Market:
>If exist a big demand will have a supply to that because someone want make money

NN:
>A cabinet with 10 corporativists in it because they want big companies to be partners of the state and the rest die

People who choose the second are too dumb and therefore impotent, so they need a master to protect them, like a herder and his sheep. You was just born like a cattle and will always be one, its the nature of things, the parasites are grateful and they'll make your equality when you die.

File: please_tread_on_me.png (123KB, 595x397px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 595x397px

>>133452307

File: carol losers.png (60KB, 413x189px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 413x189px

>>133452509
>hide the fact
And you like being lied to?

>>133453180
Fuck you, anon. I am 23 and currently in law school. I am better than you by default (well probably I'll never know)

>>133448515
>you blew it
>YOU

democrats didn't nominate him, they nominated hillary.
they only people to blame are the democrats.
SAGE

File: paxo-sage-and-onion.jpg (21KB, 381x500px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 381x500px

>>133453420
>SAGE

...and Onion.

>>133453420
You blew it by voting for the corporate cocksucker trump.

Literally a indefensible man.

>>133448515
Net neutrality psyop being pushed on /pol/ ay carumba!

>>133453307
I'm not a republican, so I'm not being lied to.
I'm just appreciating the difference in the parties' goals.
It's based on those goals that I can forgive the rednecks their gullibility.

You on the other hand, have no space to talk about it when you wear a donkey pin on your lapel, which represents a blatantly incorrect worldview from the outset.

>>133448515
get the fuck out bitch

>>133453964
Better to wear a donkey pin that represents the taxpayer money going to the people, rather than stupid shit like corporate pockets, like some people right now (note: he is potus)

>>133453919
>You blew it by voting
>voting
half of eligible voters did not vote in the 2016 presidential election
dumbass.
SAGE

>>133454280
And you still voted to the indefensible man. How stupid do you have to be to vote for a man who keeps saying to reign in wall street while actually being part of that group he is trying to rein in?

>>133454361
>still voted
>>133454280
>half of eligible voters did not vote in the 2016 presidential election
>dumbass.
SAGE

File: 1386564287807.png (268KB, 385x526px) Image search: [Google]

268KB, 385x526px

>>133452603
>both wanted the fuck over the jews destroying this country
seems good enough for me.

File: CZX3yHaWYAA49Bg.jpg (60KB, 600x305px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 600x305px

cuck for Sanders was never a popular campaign message and it never will be

saged

>>133455147
>saged
>saw thread bumped to page 1
why do you lie?

i wouldnt have minded if sanders won. but the dnc screwed him out of it and shows just how partisan the whole thing was. the rnc tried to get rid of trump too but he was just to powerful.

at least sanders would have been different. he's a fucking socialist but it was different than obama as a message. hillary represented the establishment, obama, which is why she lost.

dems were stupid to not capitalize on bernie's popularity, even though they disagree with him on basically everything.

File: S&O.jpg (21KB, 209x301px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 209x301px

>>133454455
>>133455357
>SAGE

...and Onion.

>>133455549
I agree. He wanted to save the middle class with universal healthcare, a step-by-step increase in minimum wage, cutting of the terrible free trade deals that hurt this country, and a tax plan that taxed the top 1% a hell of a lot more.

File: 1495901215193.jpg (144KB, 750x741px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 750x741px

No refunds.

>>133455549
you might be retarded

File: cianiggersintown.jpg (244KB, 750x684px) Image search: [Google]

244KB, 750x684px

>>133455357
I forgot to type in sage

>>133455777
i'm for universal health care. cost is the problem which no one wants to address. it does not cost 10 grand for a hospital room overnight. that pill that saves your life does not cost several hundred dollars. the cost of health care is inflated beyond belief and even the republicans in power wont address it. health care coverage isnt the problem, a pill costing several hundred dollars (muh research in the 80s!) is.

>>133455972
if dems had run bernie, he would have won.

File: Donald trump.jpg (79KB, 598x314px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 598x314px

>>133450586

Banks and usury.

Net Neutrality.

Every incident of industrial pollution, ever.

Lobbyists.

Geez, grow the fuck up.

It's a dog eat dog world out there; and cucks like you are sucking off the biggest dogs you can get your cummy little mits on.

Because essentially - you're scum.

>>133455972
Why are you republicucks so mad that Bernie, you know, is changing the Democratic party with a grassroots movement that supports the working class? About raising minimum wage? Universal heathcare? Fucking over corporate greed? Tax reform that supports the poor and middle class?

>>133456335
And tax raises would happen to make up for the costs. Sure, that's a reasonable objection. But the fact of the matter is that people save more from healthcare in the long run compared to the tax increases.

The Dems are taking this shit one step at a time. Obamacare isn't perfect, but fuck nothing at first try with a complex system like healthcare is perfect.

>>133448515
sanders also wanted to increase my taxes to 100% and probably start masacring christians
Although i am not a christfag

>>133456554
White people don't know what it is to be poor

>>133456681
>sanders also wanted to increase my taxes to 100%
Don't lie. Sanders wanted to reform taxes to ensure it's actually progressive, that the fucking 1% give it's 50% wealth back to the people. It actually alleviates the middle and working class.

But of course for healthcare all will be taxed overall, but a lot of the burden is shouldered by the filthy rich.

>>133456554
im not even talking about raising taxes to give health care. im attacking the very problem which is the cost. a pill you need should not cost several hundred dollars. but these are private companies trying to make mega bucks.

right now you can travel to another country, have a vacation, and go see the dentist for a ton of work and spend less than you would in the US

the inflation of cost is the problem. they're getting blood from rocks at this point. no healthcare bill from either dems or republicans addresses this fact.

>>133448515
The government is worse than corporations, period. Your claims that Sanders or any member of government can make the ebil corporations go away by stealing their money and giving it to the government is so monumentally delusional as to boggle the mind.

No corporation has ever taken a dollar from me without my consent. The government steals more money from me and puts more of my money in the pockets if bankers than any amount of simply taxing people less would.

You know nothing. It's good that you got your teeth bashed out and were utterly humiliated by Right Wing Men.

>>133456880
There is no such thing as progressive taxes. They should all be abolished, you are a thief, and the "filthy rich" do not exist.

Good thing you lost, criminal.

>SANDERS WANTED TO PROTECT NET NEUTRALITY
That's a great argument for believing it's a bad thing for the average user.

>>133457268
>>133457088
>a gov't accountable to the people is worse than a corporation who only wants to profit
kill yourself pronto

>>133456900
Aren't they trying to address that? It's always pointed out as one of the flaws of Obamacare.

>>133458056
they didnt touch it as far as i can tell from the bills that they've been working on. even the dems were just going to throw more money at the problem. cost of basic care is the real issue and neither party wants to address it. it drives me nuts, basic care and going to the doctor is not a several thousand dollar deal.

You may not have agreed with everything he stood for, but you got to admit, Sanders was one of the few truly genuine candidates.
Trump would contradict himself within the same sentence, and Clinton would be churning out "pokemon go to the poles" level fake politician garbage. Sanders really does have what he feels is in the best interest for the common man at heart.

>SANDERS WANTED TO PROTECT NET NEUTRALITY, THE CORPORATE FUCKS TO STAY OUT OF OUR INTERNET

So he could make it even more of a sjw playground and tell me I'm a shitty person for being white. Fuck that old kike

>>133458600
I think people touched it with lowering costs to make medicine, other countries made exceptions to allow "generic medicine" more with copyright trademark shit, I forgot how that worked but America would benefit a lot from that maybe.

>>133458603
And he continues to go around the US preaching his message. He's like one of the few candidates that brought change to the system by just running.

>>133459499
the copyright stuff is a big part of the problem. they extend the life of the copyright so generics arent allowed. thats why we keep seeing people literally taking a vacation to mexico or so and getting all their treatment, for less. the cost is the problem.

i hate obama but trying to cover everyone with health care is probably the best thing he could do. its fucked up now but its now an entitlement rather than just a private thing from jobs. republicans aren't even trying to drive it back now despite voting 50+ times to repeal it. now that they could do that, they aren't.

File: 1497154734424.png (180KB, 500x405px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 500x405px

>voting for someone who supports the AWB