In all honesty how would his idelogy be described as? It's

>>133439530
not retarded

>>133439530
Someone needs to make a new party because the two we have right now are too extreme.

>>133439530
National Capitalist. But not the anit-Semitic type.

>>133439530
Molynism

>>133439530
He's changed to now being a Jew apologist. Someone got to him.

>>133439530
Jewish

>>133439530
Libertarian Nationalist, bordering on AnCap (he seems to want a small government with little power and few regulations) and doesn't advocate for an ethno-state but does comment on the reality of some races being better at forming communities of moral and independent citizens.

>>133439530
paleoconservative

>>133439530
Lookatthesefunnybengarrison comicseventhoughtheyreallthesamehehehexDDDism

>>133439530
He's a gradualist Hoppean ancap.

>>133440585
This.

>>133439530
just look at his face and eyes -- he's a fucking sperg

figuring out the best niche at the present moment and milking it

>>133441165
Looks like a poor man's joss whedon.

>>133439530
Decent people try not to give it a name. Others call it alt-right, nazi, facist, etc.

Anarcho capatalism

>>133439530

He doesn't seem to understand the idea of cause and effect. He will simply look to ideas of the past and claim they offer some deeper insight or are objectively correct, forgetting the reasons why things in the past are no longer used.

He is very aggressive towards any criticism to the point of being offensive.

The "not an argument" meme demonstrates the guys inability to defeat opposing opinions. How people don't see this annoys me. Him having an abrupt answer to a diverging opinion does not mean they are wrong, it means he is ignorant.

His policies are poorly thought through, he does not seem to realize that his ideas were used in the distant past. Just because they worked (the fact we are here now is proof it works) does not mean it is the best system. With any system someone always wins and will take charge, it's an unavoidable.

He often uses tactics used by SJWs to cement his followers. He takes points to their furthest possible extremes, treats it a logical conclusion, and claims he is the one being moderate.

>>133439530

>In all honesty how would his idelogy be described as? It's an interesting fusion of pro-free markets and anti-coercion, but also being supportive of tough immigration standards and the necessity for good cultural values.

And the lands this new, glorious civic national, monocultural and libertarian civilisation will naturally just-so-happen to be the lands of the White race, and OF COURSE, "petty" racial and ethnic nationalism will have to be stopped.

(((WHAT WERE THE CHANCES)))

Stefan (((Molyneux))) is a hypocrite of the highest order. Preaches that Christian western values is what is needed to save the world, yet is actually an atheist jew. You can't preach good moral values if your entire belief system only allows for moral relativism to begin with.