[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Why are mods such fucking commies? Are people actually falling

This is a red board which means that it's strictly for adults (Not Safe For Work content only). If you see any illegal content, please report it.

Thread replies: 28
Thread images: 5

File: Screenshot (7).png (99KB, 715x403px) Image search: [Google]
Screenshot (7).png
99KB, 715x403px
Why are mods such fucking commies?

Are people actually falling for the kike trick that is net "neutrality?"
>>
reminder that net neutrality has been around for less than five years. the entire idea of net neutrality was hamfisted into place by obama and liberals are shaking in their boots now that republicans and the fcc are getting rid of it.

it's corporate welfare that passes the cost of internet usage down to the customer. there's a reason companies with large bandwidth usage like google, Facebook, netflix, and r*ddit are the ones shilling for it, because they don't have to pay a fair amount of money for their operations. as a result, cable companies raise the rates of the average joe customer to subsidize them.

the only argument FOR net neutrality is a strawman or slippery slope which claims that if the government doesn't protect us from the ISP boogeyman, they'll move to a pay-per-view model (which doesn't even exist in cable tv now) and charge per website. or you'll pay $1000 to visit 4chan. or you'll pay 50+ for each website genre. the internet existed for 20+ years without this regulation and none of these fallacies took place.

now tell us how great net neutrality is without a fallacy
>>
>>133430728
>reminder that net neutrality has been around for less than five years

No, it hasn't, you lying sack of shit. Net neutrality was more or less the default. The Title II bullshit a few years ago was put into place because companies were getting uppity like niggers and people realized something needed to be done.
>>
>>133430728
>being this new

Net neutrality has been around in some form since the birth of the internet. It was only recently that it was written into law.

Also 4chan has been campaigning since its inception against every one of these attempts to change the way the internet works to profit the ISPs. This shit happens every 2-3 years and you newfags don't even realize how stupid you are
>>
>>133430728
>they'll move to a pay-per-view model (which doesn't even exist in cable tv now)

This is a lie. You can order individual channels and packages right now. In fact it's the only way to get some sports.
>>
>>133431344
>that's right goyim, just look who's supporting (((net neutrality)))
>>
File: Screenshot (9).png (160KB, 1003x564px) Image search: [Google]
Screenshot (9).png
160KB, 1003x564px
>>133431596
>>
>>133431596
Look who's against it. Kikes on both sides idiot.
>>
Redpill on net neutrality: Republicans and others are dead right that Title II from 1930s was not meant to regulate ISPs and is ill-equipped to do so. Pass a new law and don't let the ISPs write all of it.
>>
WTF I want ISPs to be able to censor 4chan now
>>
File: MSO.png (59KB, 800x200px) Image search: [Google]
MSO.png
59KB, 800x200px
>>133431666
>meanwhile on the other side...
>>
>>133430728
>>133431596
Why are you against this? Why would you want to pay more for your internet? We are living in a world that has net neutrality RIGHT NOW. Notice anything bad happening? No. Because IT'S NOT A BAD THING YOU FAGGOTS

>inb4 good goy

I just don't want to pay extra for access to the internet for christ sake!
>>
>>133430728
>3 people with the ancap flag invariably pop up to shill in every net neutrality thread
really makes you think
>>
File: goy.gif (7KB, 501x372px) Image search: [Google]
goy.gif
7KB, 501x372px
>>133430625
>>
>>133430625
All the mods are leftovers from when moot ran 4chan.
Moot only let his personal friends be mods.
Moot is a massive faggot.
Put it together.
Also you're unironically fucking retarded if you actually think net neutrality is a "kike trick" and aren't just shilling. American ISPs provide 1/3rd of the speeds they should at 2x the price. They throttle, impose caps, and will charge you when they fuck up and break something. They're already railing you in the asshole killing net neutrality just means you have to pay them extra for it.
But the mods are still faggots.
>>
>>133431670
>>133431851
>>133431938
>I need daddy gubmint to protect muh porn or the ebil corporations are gonna take it away

If you don't like it then too fucking bad, kikes are able to spread their filth through net neutrality. Internet regulation is just what the jews want.
>>
>>133432493
careful with that edge there
>>
Anyone who is using the internet enough to find 4chan is in the power-user category. Unless of course you're already too poor to buy the upper-tier internet that the (((((ISPs))))) lock the second-class citizens out of, as punishment for not wageslaving hard enough. This isn't even a partisan issue but all the T_D fags who found /pol/ this year blindly support it without using their critical thinking skills.
>>
>ITT shills trying to convince /pol/ that net neutrality is a Jewish plot or some shit so they'll all fight against it
>>
>>133432493
You're a fucking moron. Do you wear a helmet by chance?
>>
>>133430625
You must be one of those new edgy "im the new republicans" kind of faggot...
>>
>>133432942
Kikes don't want it. With NN, "the little guy" has a chance to get his website on your screen. Without it, kikes decide what's cheap for you to watch. It's fucking simple.
>>
>>133432493
>Jews control everything but wont abuse the ability to censor sites they don't like
ok
>>
>>133432942
No, net neutrality is actually government interference in the free market. Anti net neutrality is for giving the power to the businesses. Either way we'll get fucked somehow kek.
>>
>>133433257
>flag
>wants more government

>>133433468
You mean like the government already does?
>>
>>133430728
>1 POST BY THIS ID

HE'S BEEN COPYPASTAING THIS IN EVERY THREAD AND THEN DITCHING FOR THE NEXT.
>>
Only ISPs CEOS want NET NEUTRALITY GONE !
>>
File: Smell the globe faggot.png (1MB, 1093x947px) Image search: [Google]
Smell the globe faggot.png
1MB, 1093x947px
>>133433987
Yep, this guy is a shill.

I like you Faggy-Anon.
Thread posts: 28
Thread images: 5


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.