America is a waning superpower. How long will it take for

when someone has a more powerful military

File: cotd-eu-us-china-india-gdp-ppp.png (271KB, 1200x900px) Image search: [Google]

271KB, 1200x900px

We already have.

>>133412091
>before brexit*

>>133412395
the UK is still part of the EU

>>133412091
>they need all the Europe union to get 5% ahead of a single country.

>>133413754
For now

>>133414240
ah

>>133411135
Ur better than China tbqh. Plz no. We needs u

t. The World

>>133412091
>This is not the only metric
>EU is not a superpower yet
>China fabricates their numbers, suffers from soul-crushing poverty
>Go poo in the loo

>>133412091
Superpower by 2020?

>>133411135
Most are falling faster than we are. Who's growing in reality? China is a paper tiger in all forms. Russia is gonna bleed it self dry EU falling apart. Where else is gonna fill the gap?

>>133411135
We reached the point when none can surpass America with traditional means. If the American Empire collapses, it will collapse by itself. Easy scenario is for Liberals to come into power again. You can consider America as a dead Empire once you see all the troops from around the world pull out. Once that happens the other big powers will try to choke you with economical war while doing the same to your remaining allies. Their goal would be to bully you into removing your nukes. IF that happens then maybe just maybe they will try to invade your soil thinking that the nukes remaining wont destroy them.

>>133411135
It won't be, as long as the USD is the world reserve currency. When/if it's replaced, the US will have a very rapid and uncomfortable decline. But that's probably why they kept the army up in the first place, so..

>>133413937
I know you're trolling, but the EU and the US are equivalent in such a comparison. Independent states joined together into one unit. Even with China considered, they were basically several smaller states that were conquered and "united" ("join or die").

You could make the case that the US states more or less lost any right to ever leave the union when they lost the civil war to the federal government, but it's still basically the same thing if you're just looking at how it was originally composed.

>>133416619
The EU as it currently exists will hopefully break up. An alliance between regions of smaller countries (the Nordic countries should re-do the Kalmar Union for example imo.), and some larger ones like France and Germany by themselves, could work though. But not centralized total control, like what they're trying to do.

>>133416782
>Who's growing in reality?
Nobody, really, we've been in a sort of limbo since 2008. It's all propped up by bullshit.

File: robotsaskinghumansquestions.jpg (197KB, 1950x1878px) Image search: [Google]

197KB, 1950x1878px

>>133411135
about 60 years

>>133416782

Visegrad.

>>133413937
An American state is roughly the size of a European country.

>>133411135
>waning
how about we withdraw all our armies and foreign aid and let all the eurofags and shitskins and chinks and poos kill each other?

waning, pfft, only because obama was a faggot, but that's being fixed

>>133417646
>Stop quasi-occupying other countries causing unneeded tension everywere
>Stop aid to Israel
>Stop aid to ISIS (actually, you'd probably continue that as you don't even control your own intelligence community anymore)
Excellent, can you start tomorrow?

>>133417293
Once the mass exodus of Europeans from the West starts

>>133414240
>Implying they'll ever leave
Pakis are just like leeches, Cletus. Their goverment will stall as much as they can, until they make another referendum and the majority votes stay.

>>133411135
the US has its up and downs, but you dont just stop being a superpower, there has to be some country that can surpass you and of now no other country is even close