I'm looking for a good source of objective news. For the

>>133404521
nothing wrong wit that

You can't. It's literally impossible. You have to check a variety of sources.

OANN
RT
Slate
PBS
NPR
Stormfront

>>133404521
>getting all my news from inforwars
Wewlad
Personally i read mostly Gotnews cause Chuck is gonna save us all
Social Matter is also enjoyable, altho its more op-ed than news.

File: globalists.jpg (46KB, 852x478px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 852x478px

>>133404867
This.


My daily news looks like this
>WSJ
>Politico
>BBC News
>NPR
>Reuters
And for keks and entertainment (and information about the pedophile armies that run the planet) Inforwars.

>>133404876
nothing wrong about it tho

>>133404521

> Hi I'm getting my news from the best source, but I want to downgrade.

May I suggest trying Breitbart, later the New york times and slowly work your way down to CNN.

>>133404867
>>133405162
Where do politicians get their news from?

No such thing as objective news, they all have agendas and biases. Pick a side.

>>133404521
Despite being a living meme, AJ/Infowars is more of an authentic news source than 90% of what's out there. At least they don't pretend to be unbiased.

>>133405395
If I had news company I wouldn't let any biases.
I'm radical centrist™.

>>133405363
The paper and briefings. No joke though, watch C-SPAN, they always say either "i was briefed" or "I read it in the paper just like you".

Every news organization has an agenda, every journalist an opinion. They would be biased even if they tried to report objectively. Get your news from multiple sources, focus on the facts, make up your own mind.

>>133405597
You would probably still do it unconsciously. The way you word certain things, put emphasis on certain facts, maybe repeat words, unwittingly withhold facts.. there are plenty of ways it could still be biased.