This woman will be the first to join the Army's elite 75th

>>133401189
You'll have your answer in nine months.

>>133401189
If they can complete the same requirements, yes. Even more so for special forces which is about bonding with insurgents to create an asymmetrical force in your favor. A woman's innate abilities would do well there with the added level of skill required to become a special forces member.

>>133401563
You're an idiot.

>>133401440
fpbp

File: 1476852354241.gif (959KB, 299x199px) Image search: [Google]

959KB, 299x199px

>>133401781
I'm also a vet whose served with women (some of whom were in special operations, not forces, with me) that were head and shoulders above some faggot on the internet, so suck my dick.

File: 1454765741949.png (2MB, 1713x1790px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1713x1790px

>>133401189
Nope.
But who the fuck honestly gives a shit at this point? Our military deserves to suffer, they brought this on themselves.

>>133402378
Did they have any negative effects on group cohesion though? That's the main reason I wouldn't want women in the military even if they met the requirements

File: warwojak.jpg (136KB, 746x982px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 746x982px

>>133401189
>Should women serve in the army? Why and why not?
No, only when defending your country from foreign invaders as a last resort
It's not even because they are weaker and cry when under pressure, even a crippled man in a wheelchair can kill somebody with a rifle.

You don't send women into wars for the same reason you don't send resource gatherers out to fight on RTS games. Not only they are weaker/slower than regular soldiers, but they also are needed to produce more soldiers.
If you start killing the enemy's women, you are killing the unborn enemy soldiers that might be a problem in the next 2 decades. Plus, if you capture the enemy women you can WOLOLO them into producing more soldiers to YOU, which is even worse for the enemy.

Even a 14 year old boy can outperform a woman in combat, but we don't send them either because the reason why you are fighting the war is to protect your women and children not some kike's interests
A country that sends it's own women to die is a country without a future

>>133402378
Stolen valor

>>133402378
>special operations, not forces, with me
sure m8

>>133401563
>If they can complete the same requirements, yes

They fucking can't though. Literally every attempt to put women in combat arms has required them to lower the standards.

>>133402716
No different than any other person. SOCOM/AFSOC, weeds people out pretty quickly. In Big Blue/Big Green the same ratio of dicks and cunts, exist. There are more males in the military so you notice the dicks who completely fuck up unit morale more, however.

US Marine here. Out Company Gunny pretty much summed it up when he once said, "I have met many women in my career that were amazing leaders and amazing Marines, however, in hand to hand combat, I would kill every one of them.

Case closed. War is about killing, not your feelings.

>>133403839
Alright sounds fine to me then. I trust someone who's actually experienced it than someone trying to extrapolate based on their perception of women.
>>133403046 's Argument is decent though, but this would only matter if you had a real big war where you had to draft a good chunk of your population.

>>133404354
See >>133403739

The whole question of "if they can meet the requirements" sounds reasonable and makes sense until you find out that none of them fucking can. All of this shit is political and isn't about finding the best people for the job.

>>133401189
women do fine when faced when combat. it is everything that leads up to combat that destroys and erodes their body and makes them less suited for a combat-oriented role.

File: 1499889453741.gif (3MB, 132x216px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 132x216px

>>133401189
No. Simple fact is that man can do everything better in army. Maby field cafeteria maiden or field-brothel moral booster max.
Inb4 some Semite posts IDF pig disgustings.

>>133401189
Nah, brah.

There were like 8-10 girls in my company, 6 of them broke down crying every now and then in basic training.

It was pretty awkward.

>>133401189
you post as if the woman in your picture is joining the rangers. For anyone who thought that: this is just some random bimbo. The article does not show a pic of the woman or even give her name

File: Casta_painting_all.jpg (430KB, 1419x2000px) Image search: [Google]

430KB, 1419x2000px

>>133401189

>10/10 roastie will service our elitest troops's every whim

God bless America

>>133402716
> do they have negative effects on unit cohesion?
Know how I know you never served? You use faggot ass middle management talk like that. Shut the fuck up, you have no right to speak.

>>133401189
>Should women serve in the army? Why and why not?

No. Because they're women.

>>133405450
Nobody thinks that. fuck off.

>>133403046
>>133402599
And what about the stronger women who drove tanks in wwii and fought off whole battalion by themselves. Not all women are weak. And why would a solider if trained break formation to save someone. I doubt anyone from this era would save a women.

There's already CST females grinding shit out on the daily.
This shouldn't be a surprise. Good lock getting them through PJ/CCT pipeline tho.

>>133406152
Go back to kissing the ground vets walk on burger.

File: InttiTöttö.jpg (129KB, 612x612px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 612x612px

>>133403739
>>133404188
>>133404354
>They fucking can't though. Literally every attempt to put women in combat arms has required them to lower the standards.

Is there any official evidence about lowering the standards for women? I'm sure plenty of anecdotal evidence exists, but that's always shrugged off as unreliable. Feel free to share a story or two if you have personal experiences about it.

The Finnish army has some sort of PT tests that where they grade you according to push-ups, pull-ups, cooper and the like. They used to be the same for women and men, but at some point they changed it so that women get points more easily. Not sure if it that has that much significance, since it was just the basic PT test for everybody.

Apart from lower physical strength and stamina women also break down more easily. Heard a lot of stories from NCO and officer school where a lot of women simply quit, because their body is breaking down more easily and they don't have the time to heal up. Also heard how the other conscripts had to sometimes carry the gear of the women and sometimes even the women themselves.

File: 1497737166767.jpg (59KB, 720x536px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 720x536px

Yeah, put 'em in. More blood on the PC crowd's hands.

File: ss+(2017-07-13+at+09.35.39).png (21KB, 647x158px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 647x158px

Females have worse pain tolerence.
Females heal wounds slower.
Females have 60-40% less upper body strength.
Females have 30-25% less lower body strength.
Females convert less food into muscle and more into fat.
Females have less lung volume.

There are a top % that can reach the average of the male soldier, but due to biological differences it is greatly reduced. More soldiers for the grinder is nice, but this has nothing to do with that because:

>>133407017
Just take a look at NZ and AUS army.
Physical standards are lower across the board.
Even for NZ's special "club" as they call it.

This will get people killed.
http://www.defencecareers.mil.nz/army/joining-up/fitness-requirements
Feel free to take a look.
If it wasn't about political correctness and diversity then the standards wouldn't be lowered.

>>133401189
No they are completely useless. I have served as a conscript for 1,5 years in Greek army and met literally more than a hundred. Basically they are useless and in universities, if you subtract the made up fields like social gender studies etc.

>>133401563
>>>133401189 (OP)
>If they can complete the same requirements, yes. Even more so for special forces which is about bonding with insurgents to create an asymmetrical force in your favor. A woman's innate abilities would do well there with the added level of skill required to become a special forces member.
Come fight for ZOG, I'll succ ur dick

>>133407632
Yaaaay
Women get to cause the deaths of their fellow soldiers with their incompetence in the UK as well soon!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3521538/Army-fitness-tests-written-make-sure-female-soldiers-qualify-line-duty.html
I love diversity.

>>133401189
She can throw her boobs at them. Ban assault tits
>women
>oh em gee he has like a 42 inch cock
>4.5" asian
Here have a grenade

File: 1475953960026.jpg (168KB, 1350x879px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 1350x879px

>>133406643
Practically no women were tankers in WWII. Heavy equipment is a bitch to work on. Taking off a tanks undercarriage in the field is a difficult task even for a crew of 5 men.
There were women snipers and things like Night Witches though.

>>133401189
Sure. Our fighting men deserve some slampig to reduce their stress. I am for free fuck toy women for our soldiers.
Thanks, for volunteering, sluts!

>>133402378
>t. reddit bullshit artist

>>133403046
You are afraid of strong women

>>133406643
>And what about the stronger women who drove tanks in wwii and fought off whole battalion by themselves
How about this strong woman that can hold off battalions be back home raising strong children with her superior genes instead?
You have a hammer, a screwdriver, a wrench and a 10/10 porcelain knife. You need to use one of them to kill somebody.
The knife is great at it's job, but it is the only tool you have to cut meat. Why would you risk breaking your precious knife and ability to cut perfect stakes when you can just use the hammer?
Women can have children, men cannot. Women are precious and should be protected, men are expendable.

> And why would a solider if trained break formation to save someone. I doubt anyone from this era would save a women.
If you had to choose one: having your 10/10 handsome brother be kidnapped by niggers or your 10/10 sister with big tits, which one would you choose?
If a gang of thugs came up and slapped your male friend in the face, you might just let them get away with it, but if they slap your female friend on the ass, you HAVE to at least try to defend her her, or you can't call yourself a man
How can a soldier call himself a man if he doesn't break formation when he knows the girl who he has a bit of a crush on is about to get captured and raped to death by shitskins?
A male soldier MAY be tortured when captured, he may even die. A female soldier WILL get raped, might die or on the worse case scenario can be sold as a sexslave.
If you doubt anybody would refuse to save a woman, especially a soldier who puts his life on the line everyday, it means you are a gigantic cuck

File: 14c.jpg (27KB, 600x733px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 600x733px

>>133402378

>>133408421
And that's not even considering the damage to morale this will do, I mean, It's not like, ever in history, Women in the military, have like, destroyed troop morale, like ever. Right?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women%27s_Battalion
oh
Women deserve spaces free of men! But Men deserve no spaces, everything, where they can be alone with their bros, will be infested by females in the name of equality..

>>133402378

Women are a joke dude for anything beyond housekeeping, sex puppetry and baby birthing.

>>133401189
is she going to provide "stress and tenseness relief" for the rest of the squad or what?

>>133401563
That's not the mission of the Ranger Regiment.

Women do have their place, and that's in intel and working undercover (SF dude and woman acting like gf and bf and taking lots of pictures).

Women should not have a role in actual fighting, though. Especially with Direct Action-oriented units like the 75th Ranger Regiment. Those guys have to carry a ridiculous amount of equipment and ammo.

>>133402716
There are more male fuck-ups than female fuck-ups, but the latter causes a disproportionate amount of trouble for the unit as a whole. Lance Corporal Schmuckatelie gets a DUI, gets Nj 'd, busted down and put on restriction. Lance Corporal Schmuckette gets a DUI, accuses 3 dudes of rape, loses shit before a CMR, and somehow gets a meritorious promotion and/or moved to a new unit(if she wants).

>>133408932
You're quite worked up about this. You in the tiny bird military?

File: 1498581503859.png (423KB, 1057x611px) Image search: [Google]

423KB, 1057x611px

>>133401440
He's right you know

>>133402599
>how is our 24/7 news cycle going to cover a raped captured, raped, mutilated woman?

well I guess germany and sweden are female combat ready, then

>>133402378
>Hurr durr, I'm a vet. I worked as a chef. I-I got PTSD when a pot boiled over. HURR DURR Women can do anything a man can do!

>>133409450
Part of me wishes.
Although part of me does not.
But it's not up to me, I have medical conditions so unless those go away I can't join.
Don't even get government fucking gibs for my condition, but Maori nig nogs get gibs for fucking nothing all the time.
All I do is make knives out of wood and grumble on /pol/ at this point. Fucking kill me.

Any trained soldier could kill this woman in 10 seconds.

>>133408889
There are tons of women nowadays there's some 7 billion people in the world why do you want to have more kids in a already overpopulated world.
I mean you probably think trans men on hormones shouldn't be in the army either.
Prove to me one soldier that died because they broke ranks to save a woman or do her job for her.
>protip you can't

>>133409854
Especially once she fractures her pelvis after rucking all over creation wearing 150lbs of "high speed" bullshit.

She's an officer though and because officers are fucking useless having her in a ranger regiment will be fine. The rest of the people around her are going to be relatively squared away so if they have to drag a shit sandwich around for a bit nobody will care.

File: 0412171740.jpg (875KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

875KB, 2560x1440px

>>133401189
No.

If a female wants to be elite military, let her.

But do not change or lower requirements. If she can't perform exactly the same as men physically and mentally, she has no business being military.

>>133408932

>Although the women performed well in combat and suffered few casualties their example was not enough to inspire the mass of war-weary soldiers to continue fighting.

Wikipedia never fails to make me laugh

>>133409814
Oh man, I'm like the American version of you. Except I can't make wood knives.

Best wishes NZ-bro.

>>133410117
>7 billion people in the world why do you want to have more kids in a already overpopulated world.
In 3rd world shitholes, not in Europe or America.
>I mean you probably think trans men on hormones shouldn't be in the army either.
They shouldn't, they have as much business serving as does someone with diabetes.

File: dead soldier 1.jpg (683KB, 800x1135px) Image search: [Google]

683KB, 800x1135px

>born too late to fight barbarians
>born too early to fight ayylmaos
>born just in time to wage wholesale war in a time of such delusion that they shoehorn women onto the front lines

At this point I say bring on WWIII boys, gonna fuck me plenty of dying aryan girls as their guts hang out and they scream for daddy.

>Biologically imposible to have as much strength as men
>Men instinctvely try to protect women at all cost
>If they get ever captured they will be raped to death, you are giving free women to sex starved muslims, great idea

Theres no shortage of jarheads for the front lines, whats the point.

>>133406152
You are a *literal* welfare whore; if you rubbed two of your five neurons together, you'd realize that the US military doesn't protect us from legitimate threats, only Israeli interests.

>>133401189
Love the rubber look, just not inside the titties.

>>133401189
if she passed the exact same tests and training as the guys i dont see a problem unless she fucks up in the field, if she passed because of reduced expectations for women (amount of weight able to carry and all that shit) and got in for PC and propaganda points then there is an issue. time will tell and i hope it is the former rather than the latter.

>>133410433
I hope our super volcano erupts and wipes this shitty mini-continent off the face of the Earth.

>>133410402
Fuck, just read that article again, section I was referencing has been removed, fucking Jews, it's got a lot more "wymynz was perfect soldiers" than it used to.
Eh, was a section on how male soldiers hated the female ones for not letting them retreat that I was referring to.

>>133401189
I would definitely like to spend the night in her foxhole, if you know what I mean.

>>133408774
no woman is stronger than the 12 children she can bear

File: jew.jpg (38KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 600x600px

>>133410117
> OY VEY WORLD IS OVER POPULATED
> GOTTA HAVE LESS CHILDREN TO STOP GLOBAL WARMING
> WE MUST IMPORT MORE REFUGEES
Found the shill

Trannies shouldn't be allowed either because it makes you look weak by association
Which army do you think ISIS fears most? The russians with their squat vodka drinking lunatics or modern day america's, full of women and pansies with artificial vaginas?

>>133406473
I did. I thought it was a good idea to have a prostitute along so we don't need to outsource that shit.

Bring back comfort women.

>>133404894
Women are shit at everything they do. The very idea of a female soldier is laughable. I bet you have a pegging fetish.

>>133401189
Woman are inferior in combat. It is just the nature of gender. Woman play supportive roles.

>>133403046
That's where you're wrong kiddo, I beat the greeks on a game of age of empires by spamming workers at them.

>>133411746
Wow that is disgusting.

>>133411131
lmao

>Elite Female Ranger raped and killed in battle. Feminists shocked: Where were the men?

>>133402378

gay!

>>133401189
Name one thing women have involved themselves in that has not been ruined or made worse by their involvement.

Besides porn/sex related tasks

>>133412271
Raping her, duh.

>>133411042
No. No. No. You dont understand this unit. Terrible idea. She will been relegated to a desk. Period. If she ends up on a mission she'll guard the vehicles with a few privates. Guaranteed.

>>133403839
>SOCOM/AFSOC
>AFSOC
>special operations, not forces
lmao, you were supply for TACPs and PJs? Get the fuck out of here.

>>133412631
>guard the vehicles with a few privates
A few privates' privates?

Squid here. Women are insufferable on ships and get special treatment. 300 guys cooped up on a boat will do anything to get close to a woman. Plus they're miserable to work with. All Navy women end up disgusting as well. i have no idea what would inspire a woman to join the military.

>>133412760
Itll be a fucking train wreck but kept in-house.

If a woman wants to be a soldier, she should have her face scarred, tits removed and cooch surgically sealed to remove all value in the sex trade.

File: 1485530006586.jpg (222KB, 960x640px) Image search: [Google]

222KB, 960x640px

mandatory

File: 1489100614190.webm (873KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

873KB, 500x500px

>>133401189

With the growing prominence and importance of technology in warfare I don't see why not. The more willing soldiers for the draft the better.

discord gg/WbDVqFr

>>133413412
This unit does not need women. There is no net benefit. If there was it would have happened years ago. Terrible idea.

>>133413412
>sandmonkey in charge of common sense
increased technology = increased weight the average grunt has to carry

women are so weak that their hips literally break under the pressure of marching with standard infantry packs

File: 1488920746426.webm (783KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

783KB, 480x360px

>>133413382
>>133401189

>>133413204
>that pouch set up
>that weapon handling
Well you can tell she never carries anything heavy shoots or crawls.

File: princesspoints35346646.png (249KB, 1400x680px) Image search: [Google]

249KB, 1400x680px

>>133401189

>Should women serve in the army? Why and why not?

Yes. It's HER TURN.

#Feministsforthefrontlines

#draftwomen

#whyshouldboysgetallthefun

Jokes aside my National Socialist brothers:

I think that everyone should be trained to fight in our societies. There is no dishonour in a woman knowing how to defend herself and even you when the time is right.
It's simply a matter of fact that young healthy men will naturally make up the strongest and most elite sections of most of our armed forces.
We should not take the piss out of nature and insist on statistical cosmetics.

For unit composition, real psychological dynamics should be considered carefully.
This should be obvious.

Any and all communist whinings will be ignored.

>>133406152

I don't have to be an expert to see that women are too stupid to get over the most simple obstacles, let alone fight in tense situations.

Here is a video about women in the Bundeswehr.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q-NG1AnljKE

>>133413382

Powerful footage on multiple levels.

>>133401563
>>133403739
As long as a woman can complete the same requirements men have, then it's fine. The fact that they can't and that they have special lower standards for women just shows how the left wants to make our armed forces weaker.

>>133402378
>white knighting on an anonymous image board

>>133402378
>I'm also a vet

ITT: Stolen Valor

>>133402378
Being a fobbit weather man does not count. Nor does being secret squirrel.

>>133401189
finally a woman i'd rape and kill that would totally be worth the challenge.

>>133411878

Stop playing on easy scrub.

>>133415127
>Nor does being secret squirrel.
Some of us actually do stuff.

>t. SST

>>133402378
>>head and shoulders above some faggot
>Eating out an army slag
Why??

>>133415523
Bullshit. Prove it.

>>133415523
yeah you chuckle fucks always break the god damn coffee machine so i guess that counts for something.

>>133414453
>unfunny jokes
>"my National Socialist brothers"
>Reddit spacing

Fuck off, OK?

>>133415676
>>133415680
We're the guys that get attached to grunt units and literally tell them how many more mortar rounds are incoming on the patrol that we are also on because of SIGINT magic.

>>133402378
>https://www.armytimes.com/articles/this-woman-will-be-the-first-to-join-the-armys-elite-75th-ranger-regiment
this speaks volumes about the american infantry

File: 21121141242understand.jpg (35KB, 498x386px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 498x386px

>>133416012

Don't post on reddit.
Don't have a problem with reddit.
Have a problem with faggots though...

>>133401563
(Insert some sort of sexist comment about girls being weak and stupid because I said so) I'm also a fat basement dwelling neckbeard posting frogs on the most degenerate website on the net yelling cuck when I see something I dont agree with and browse on /pol/ all day looking for reasons to hate jews, left wing ideology and pretend I am a nazi.

>>133401189
field mattresses have a mixed effect on morale

>>133416186
bullshit i doubt you even know how to perform a soft armor test coupled with proper exhaust fume checking. All you know how to do is sit around while a e-3 does all the work while you sip a coffee fuck around on a laptop then parrot whatever bullshit he spouts out for us to later look at at and promptly ignore because fuck you butter bar.

>>133401189
Who the fuck would respect a female LT lmao

>>133406152
Go cry about it on rebbit

>>133416186
No dude. Proof like i posted.

>>133416294
Not really. There is no reason they shouldn't lower a woman's standards. Everyone should have a chance.

everybody in this thread is fucking retarded. also american vets can suck my dick, subhuman dumb cunts.

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/2394531-marine-corps-force-integration-plan-summary.html

this is the result of a study conducted by the US vagine corp, which """"surprisingly"""" found out that male only squads performed considerably better than mixed squads more than two thirds of the situations.

feminists btfo, egalitarianist cucks btfo too. kill yourself y'all

>>133401189
Source?

>>133406643
>And what about the stronger women who drove tanks in wwii and fought off whole battalion by themselves.
Fiction pushed to be passed off as reality. It sound believable because said woman has a huge technological advantage, in an armored fucking tank against infantry. Or are you proving a point that the only way a woman can fight in a war is if she has a huge advantage over her opponents?

>>133416812
Why shouldn't she be. She's a ranking co

>>133416809
>because fuck you butter bar.
I was enlisted fuckstick.

>>133416888
What proof did you post?

>>133417227
Oh Canada you never trust anyone over the rank of top in the military.

>>133417113
Why is it all of sudden a
>huge advantage
When a woman uses there intelligence in war to fight.
The tank woman was a Russian I think it's real.

>>133401189
Inb4 she is sidelined from an injury during training

>>133407311
A fucking leaf

>>133417557
>Here take this tank and run over/shell silly boys armed with machine guns. Don't worry the bullets can't penetrate the armor
>Fuck man we need to take out that tank and can't get close. We need to distract that tank with 80% of our squad and send a few to circle around and try to bomb it.
>No can do sarge, they're covered by enemy soldiers
>Meanwhile slut in tank cheered on being so brave and stronk

File: 1499879381702.jpg (148KB, 717x987px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 717x987px

>>133417557
>When a woman uses there intelligence in war to fight.

>>133401189
If "she" passed the physicals, "she" probably has quite the penis.

>>133416812

Men are disturbingly pussified by women. They have a natural weakness for it.
Look at how hard it is to contain those fucking female e-celeb threads.
Pretty girl + says something you like = undying loyalty white knights.

The challenge is not so much about getting women into leadership positions, as the silly feminists believe, the real challenge is keeping women AWAY from leadership positions.
They are ALL TOO GOOD at getting into power.

In the most warped and fucking twisted way, women are more alpha than men. Men derive pride from what they have to offer, women have automatic pride and just assume themselves to be superior in status, importance and view rest of the population as enemies and servants.

>>133416962
You realize theres other physiological issues at play right?

The base line requirements are just that, the lowest level requirements. It's designed so that men get stronger and stronger each day on the course while the women begin to deteriorate

>>133418215
Are you saying RASP is designed for you to get stronger in the course each day?

>>133418098
True.

>>133418606
I never went through it, but if it's like any other course in the military, you're a bit fucked up at the end?

>>133418215
>Your saying op's pic shows a woman deteriorating calling bullshit
>maybe women deteriorate in your own mind.
>>133418098
Not true its only beta males giving them attention. And women don't see people as enemies or servents jesus dude get laid once and awhile.

>>133418098

>Comparing virgin neets suffering from the great thirst with grunts and NCO's
You are certainly stupid or a really bad shill.

>They are ALL TOO GOOD at getting into power.
And I guess that means you are the latter.

>>133418769
Only if the master Sargent found the golf cart keys and is "motivating" the rear of the pack.

>>133406643
You mean all 1000 of them on the planet? Like the soviet snipers, or the French insurgents?

File: clannad_bully.gif (249KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

249KB, 480x360px

>>133416790
Omg, I'm like, like my name is Stacy....and bull Nye taught me that men and women are same like, like omg, like gender is totes just a social construct, like female veterans are not actually raped by jihadis, they're actually gathering intel by sucking dicks. OMG sorry, I offended ahmed, well I'll just suck muhummads cock so that I can atone for my implicit racism.
Pic related.

>>133406643

>Thinking Soviet Propaganda is real.