>WHHAAAAAAAAAAAA MUH BIG BAD MEANIE COOPOORASHIUNZ!!!!!!1!!11!!!

>>133388866
Without netneutrality you could not browse 4chan

grow up retard

>>133389018
Somehow I browsed it two years ago. How'd that happen?

File: IMG_0294.jpg (69KB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 1200x800px

>>133388866
Sick digits of truth btw

>>133388866
>>133389140
>>133389207
shills/10

sage

>>133389018
nonsense

>>133388866
Neocon reddit-tard logic
>someone shoots up a school
>another person shoots up a church
>it keeps happening
Heh, those are isolated incidents. We don't need gun control. Stop trying to steal my guns!
>some ISP has some spat with Netflix which gets resolved quickly
REEEEEEEEEEEE
WE NEED THE GOVERNMENT TO TAKE OVER THE INTERNET

GIVE GOVERNMENT UNLIMITED POWER OVER WHAT CAN AND CAN'T BE POSTED ONLINE AND WHICH SITES CAN EXIST

FUCK CORPORATIONS, FUCK RIGHTS

WTF I LOVE GLOBALISM NOW

>>133388866
Kill yourself u fuck

Fuck corporation. Thank god these even bigger corporations told me to support net neutrality!

>>133389688
>I advocate for a totalitarian regime but I don't want the government to control the internet

NOTHING TO HIDE NOTHING TO FEAR

IF YOUR TOO POOR TO PAY FOR WHAT YOU USE CUT YOUR CONSUMPTION OR GET YOUR FUCKING PRIORITIES STRAIGHT


I HOPE THIS SHIT PASSES

>>133389876
Fuck corporations
Love the government though which is just a huge corporation that doesn't have any larger entity to answer to

>>133389925
>I strawman on the internet to push for the government takeover of the internet so in the future I can no longer strawman someone on /pol/

>>133389018
No other country has net neutrality. I don't see how it's a problem.

File: 1496793403677.png (52KB, 600x456px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 600x456px

SAGE

File: 1491411300526.jpg (86KB, 750x1020px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 750x1020px

>>133389207
Thanks anon
>>133389262
REEEE IF DON'T WANT BIG GOVERNMENT TO REGULATE THE INTERNET THEN YOU'RE A SHILL REEEEE
>>133389688
Actually, It's the ass-blasted libtards who are shilling for (((net-neutrality))).

>>133390190
I couldn't give less of a fuck about what liberals believe. Of course they support net neutrality. They support it just because Obama, Hillary and John Oliver told them they need to support it.
What I care about is all these faggots pretending to be on the right supporting net neutrality and giving people shit for not supporting it.
These absolute morons come here and they give US shit, talking about how WE are the ones who will get hurt by not supporting net neutrality, and how 4chan can get shut down if there is no net neutrality.

These people are completely insane. This is straight up Orwellian newspeak levels of insanity.
These people are completely fucking insane.

>>133388866
If Trump does it then it's alright. He wouldn't hurt freedom of speech.

>>133388866
The funniest thing, I spent weeks making threads about this when the legislation was being voted on and no one cared.
The ship has sailed. The fat lady sang. Your time to complain passed months ago. Corporations have donated millions of dollars to insure this passes.
You should of done something months ago, it's pointless now.

>>133388866
Nice try Comcast but even I a Trump supporter realize that net neutrality is the right way to go. I just voted forTrump because deporting the spics is more important then having good internet.

>>133388866
>billionaires need more money

lol

>>133388866
>this is an issue
It will make no difference.
The Jews will still have full control, if not more.
Stop getting involved in petty issues.

>>133390190
>big government
Don't forget to clean the tractor.

>>133388866
>glrumptfh babies shilling for big corporations/ISPs to jew them now
what a masochistic race of people

>>133390522
>These people are completely insane. This is straight up Orwellian newspeak levels of insanity.
These people are completely fucking insane.
You're preaching to the choir anon.

>>133388866
Folks if you don't believe shills exist on 4chan then here you go. Anyone who doesn't support net nutrality on either side is either a shill or an uniformed idiot

>>133389018
without corporations you wouldn't be able to either, fucknugget

>>133391621
Kill yourself, retard.
Go live in North Korea for a while, see how great their internet is.

>>133390158
Yes they do. I know for a fact the EU does

>>133391157
>>133391621
>someone shoots up a school
>another person shoots up a church
>it keeps happening
Heh, those are isolated incidents. We don't need gun control. Stop trying to steal my guns!
>some ISP has some spat with Netflix which gets resolved quickly
REEEEEEEEEEEE
WE NEED THE GOVERNMENT TO TAKE OVER THE INTERNET

GIVE GOVERNMENT UNLIMITED POWER OVER WHAT CAN AND CAN'T BE POSTED ONLINE AND WHICH SITES CAN EXIST

FUCK CORPORATIONS, FUCK RIGHTS

WTF I LOVE GLOBALISM NOW

>>133391621
>Folks if you don't believe shills exist on 4chan then here you go.

They have been caught before pulling this shit

https://www.theverge.com/2017/5/10/15610744/anti-net-neutrality-fake-comments-identities

Of course 4chan is anonymous so it makes sense that they would be here

>>133392088

https://archive.is/UNjsM

>>133391797
North Korea doesn't have net neutrality. Also who do you work for? Because you need to tell your company that they should wait untill after American business hours to shill so it isn't so obvious. You're just some 9-5 kike puppet trying to rally us conservatives against net neutrality. It's not going to work, because conservatives on here actually know how the internet works.

File: 816.jpg (102KB, 680x952px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 680x952px

>>133391454
>Flag
Checks out
>>133391576
>killary babies shilling for big government and over dramatize minor incident that went back to normal.
what a masochistic race of people

>>133390158
Brazil does

We even have an internet constitution ahead of al other countries.

Step gaem up USA

File: CuKixuOWYAAkaZU.jpg (167KB, 824x630px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 824x630px

>>133392278
Please read>>133391998

>>133392414
I've no dog in your no-sided game faggito and net neutrality has no connection to big gubmint, it just keeps private companies like comcast from garnering any power over you.

>>133392088
More people need to realize this this is some of the most obvious shilling I've ever seen.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS THREAD.

>>133388866
Nice try corporate tard. Not paying you jews extra money.

>>133388866
Whoever agrees to this are jews.

File: Screenshot 2017-07-12 at 20.24.58.png (42KB, 958x237px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 958x237px

>>133392676
https://www.dailydot.com/layer8/fcc-title-ii-public-comment-pro-trump-bots/

the thread is already page 1. Might as well make people aware

>>133392915
The sad part is some anons refuse to believe that there could ever be shills on 4chan. Hopefully this thread will wake them up.

File: 1499819532357.jpg (21KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 400x400px

>>133388866
>A literal "no u" response
Liberal intellectualism
>>133392437
>BR IS SO PROGRASIFF HUEHUE
Progressively descending into chaos over your own elected officials being an actual goddamn commie, you fucking blind and retarded chimp. YOU VOTED IN AN ACTUAL COMMUNIST, THINKING IT'D BE COOL AND NOW PEOPLE ARE UPSET BECAUSE HE SAID HE'S GOING TO TRY COMMUNISM NOW. HUGE SURPRISE.

File: fcc-bot-pic-hero.jpg (52KB, 770x552px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 770x552px

>>133392915

File: fullsizeoutput_97.jpg (222KB, 958x960px) Image search: [Google]

222KB, 958x960px

>>133392088
>>133392136
>>133392676
>>133392721
>>133392897
>M-MUH EBIL COOPOORASHIUNZ
Good job commie-tards, free helicopter rides for you all.

>>133388866
Agreed, the Democratic party is about to undergo a reform. Zuckerberg 2020.

File: very impressive.png (146KB, 890x750px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 890x750px

>>133392915
>"""bots"""
>>133393271
>Because it's only ever bots when the opposition does it
>Shills for Hillzone Act 2 for a solid year
>No complaint
>People stand up to defend Trump when the media loses their shit over TWO SCOOPS
>Must be bots!
>This level of denial and delusion

>>133389018
Underage pls go, you used to be able to upload all sorts off crazy shit to the internet before the FCC got involved.

>>133392278
Surely calling people shills is going to convince them to start supporting government take over of the internet.
Do you have any fucking clue how insane you sound to someone when you accuse them of working for ''DA EVIL CORPORATIONS?''
We know for a fact that CTR posted on /pol/. If anything it would make more sense to accuse pro-net neutrality low IQ faggots of being paid shills.

Do you think we're this dumb?

Will less regulation break up monopolies isps already have?

If so get the gov out of it.

>>133391960
The EU used 'net neutrality' to block 4chan in France during the last election when a leak happened, classifying it as a media blackout.

>yfw americuckposting comes to an end because americans are so obsessed with giving (Them) new ways to profit and control information
Im genuinely curious as to what /Pol/ will be like without americans

>>133393604
It was bots spamming the FCC you complete retard, thats a fact. I'm not talking about Hillary or anything else, its not relevant

>>133388866
>same faggots want breitbart and 4chan shut down

Maybe we wouldn't need net neutrality if it weren't for the enormous regulatory barriers to startup ISPs and the frivolous lawsuits large ISPs are allowed to shove down the throats of anyone that dares to try and compete with them in "their" territories.

>>133393757
Thats not true, that was a rumour spread by rightwing sites.

That should have been obvious by the fact there were French people posting here saying it wasn't true

File: IMG_2556.jpg (185KB, 861x900px) Image search: [Google]

185KB, 861x900px

>>133388866
The digits know.

>>133391960
The EU absolutely does not have net neutrality. We've always had a pay for quality model.
Sorry to burst your bubble, retarded EU shill, but this net neutrality bullshit is an American leftard kind of shit only. The rest of the world just doesn't give a fuck.

File: 1482685299914.jpg (14KB, 187x306px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 187x306px

Wanting to string up transnational parasites is the only thing I agree with lefties on desu. People who scoff at anyone who complains about corporate greed just to virtue signal how anti-left they are need to cough up that bluepill.

File: IMG_2842.jpg (33KB, 260x194px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 260x194px

>>133393906

>>133394005
Liar

http://berec.europa.eu/eng/document_register/subject_matter/berec/press_releases/6163-press-release-berec-publishes-guidelines-on-net-neutrality

>the absolute state of /pol/ users who blindly defend everything Trump does even if it hurts their own lives

File: 1497288510914s.jpg (3KB, 125x125px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 125x125px

Kek I counted at least 5 people in this thread who are possible shills. (((You))) guys really don't want net nutrality do you? Call me a commie all (((you))) want but I voted Trump and will be doing so in 2020

File: IMG_2571.jpg (220KB, 633x989px) Image search: [Google]

220KB, 633x989px

>>133393807

>>133388866

why don't they protest to remove corporations from society, we have the ability to do that and it was done before, most anons would go for that

>>133394121
>yeah, I'll show those parasites, hehe, all I have to do is give unlimited power to international parasites who control the governments so they can censor me and give favors to the ISPs that agree with their politics hehe

British intellectuals

>>133394300

I don't know enough about net neutrality to argue m9, I was just talking about OP's 'waah muh cuprationz' shitposting.

>>133393756
Oh sweet summer child
It will do nothing but let isps come together and agree on ways to fuck over the consumer for more profit, theres nothing you can do about it because all providers have agreed to do the same so theres no alternative
Its going to be the opposite of competition

>>133391029
should've or should have*

File: fullsizeoutput_98.jpg (69KB, 630x359px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 630x359px

>>133393827
Finally someone said it.
>>133394268
See pic related

>>133394263
The people who are against net neutrality are the same people who went against Trump when he dropped bombs on Syria because of his kike daughter.
You're fucking brainwashed.
The Trump supporters who still support net neutrality are the reddit fags who live in an echochamber. This is the only thing they disagree on with Trump because of mob mentality.

>>133394295
Because the government that
>>133394268
>>133394121
>>133393807
Trust so much created those corporations through regional monopoly creating regulations.

>>133394268
Good goy. Is the gold paint on the shekels making you retarded or are you really this obvious?

>>133394425
That is the problem, no one has a fucking clue, that is why net neutrality is getting shoved down our throats and /pol/ has gone from anti-NN to pro just because of some dumb reddit shit and terrible left wing 4chan admins.

>>133389018
Net neutrality specifically has not existed in Australia. We have ISPs doing deals with content providers all the time.
I have been using 4chan since the .net days.

Kill yourself, subhuman Brazilian .

>>133389018
4chan existed in 2003. The very term, Net Neutrality, is younger than 4chan, having been made in 2005.

>>133388866
>/pol/ is in favor of giving (((privately owned))) telecoms more power over the information you see and hear.

The government is no saint but you can rest fucking assured that if the (((telecoms))) get control over internet traffic you can say goodbye to shit like Stormfront and Mtgox ever getting even one hit ever again.

(((They))) will commercialize the shit out of it and make you pay more for a limited forum to exercise your rights to free speech.

Keep supporting the (((Privately owned))) telecoms, watch how fast you lose all the shit you love about the interwebs.

>>133394441
Why because you say so?

>>133394913
Exactly, they want the internet to end up like cable. If something wouldn't be shown on TV then its not going to be allowed online

>>133394913
>being against private property
>implying you are not a commie

Return from whence you came, /leftypol/

>>133394959
No, because that is what their lobbiyist have been pushing for for the last 15 years. It's not like they have been very secretive about it.

/g/ here
net neutrality isnt perfect even a little bit, but its better than letting the isp do what it wants. believe me, you dont want that. or dont believe me. whatever, lol

>>133388866
You're on 4chan, how can you not be for net-neutrality?

>>133394632

Yeah, I should really know so I'll read up on it. I always just assume that when it comes to tech and communications stuff there's so much money involved there's no point even worrying about it- if Microsoft or Apple decide to do something who the fuck's going to stop them? Even most governments would just get out of the way.

>>133393808
>That's a fact!
>I said fact, so it's true!
>No one could have the same name! No way!
>No way they'd all be sharing the same viral article! Impossible!
>Hillary isn't relevant!
Fact denying alt-thinker. Hillary bots ran rampant for a solid year and if you were around that long, you would have seen it. It was madness and we dealt with it, rather than bitching about it everywhere like leddit-tier walking waste bins do. It's only irrelevant to you because you don't care anymore. That's how it is to be a knee-jerk reactionary liberal faggot. You only care about those starving niggers until you forget because you have the memory of a FUCKING GOLDFISH, you retarded cuck! THEY DIE EVERY DAY, NOT JUST THE DAY YOU HEARD ABOUT IT.

So you want to talk about moral outrage, you self-serving piece of shit? Where's the moral outrage over Seth Rich or the Russian conspiracy being a total lie? Seth Rich was murdered trying to spread the news, the way you liberals so romanticize Snowden as a hero. How is Seth Rich different? Because he went against H E R. You're biased and full of shit, as we've seen evidence of for months now. We've been trying to get through to you faggots but you're SO sure of yourselves with this RUSSIA shit, yet NOTHING FUCKING COMES OF IT. Your own FAKE NEWS admits it's a total fabrication! Leftists, you are all JOKES. It was under 5% of the nation that actually listened to the news, let alone believed it. That was in 2016. How many people do you think believe it now after so much physical evidence and infallible proof has been unearthed showing liberal media outright lying to the people and creating actual FAKE NEWS? One thing is certain, the election WAS rigged. Hillary never should have gotten so close to winning the election. Even without counting the 3+ million illegals that were allowed to vote in California without IDs, this says nothing for the Soros-owned rigged voting machines in dozens of states across the country.

>>133394740
australia is known for having terrible internet you fucking wallaby

>>133394913
More reddit space bullshit fear mongering. The only places on earth where you can't access Stormfront or 4chan have the internet controlled by the government.
In Germany you can't access certain sites or youtube videos. Companies don't do that.
Every single time you retarded reddit faggots push an agenda you do it trough fear mongering.
>woah, all this nationalism will lead to Hitler 2.0
>woah, if you vote Trump he will start nuclear war
>if you don't ban guns your kids will die!!!
Give it a fucking rest.

>Doesn't want the Internet to be taken over by corporations
>Wants the Internet to be taken over by the government
What a bunch of queers.

>>133395174
>/g/ here
>implying that gives you any more credibility than anyone here

It may be dealing with a technology but the heart of the issue is economics and corporate law.

>>133395108
I'm against private ownership when it's a detriment to the public. This is the case for things like police and fire depts, sanitation, primary education, ect. The internet is a place of freedom and the free exchange of ideals. I'm not in support of anything that would threaten that, and killing NN does.

It will allow private, unelected, (((busienssmen))) to determine the content that you, your family, and everyone you know has access to. Content will be removed, quarantined, or usurped to serve the (((private))) business interests.

You think this will make you free? This will give (((them))) more power over you than ever before.

>>133394959
Holy shit my dude, how can you be so ignorant of the world around you. Why are you so eager to empower rich jews? Its like a competition with you people, who can be the goodest goy

>>133395279
Jesus christ

I don't like Hillary. I'm not FUCKING TALKING ABOUT HILLARY or Seth Rich or any of that shit.

Bots were being used to post anti-net neutrality comments on the FCCs website, how about you read the fucking article linked you retard

>>133395300
>In Germany you can't access certain sites or youtube videos. Companies don't do that.
Wrong, you fucking retard.

>>133394425
To break it down. On February 26, 2015 the FCC grabbed the internet by the pussy in an effort to supposedly regulate traffic throttling. This traffic throttling problem arose because government regulations created regional monopolies, similar to how government regulation created regional monopolies for water and power utilities. This regulation makes it near impossible for new telecommunication companies to enter the scene in any big manner, so a few large companies control the market and often leave consumers with one, maybe two choices. This lack of competition, of course, makes it so that even if the ISP acts counter to the consumer's will, they have little choice, but to keep paying the large company because no competitors are able to rise and give an alternative.

The FCC power grab was an attemt at fixing this government regulation created problem by further regulation of the government.

So thanks to preexisting government regulation, you are left with these choices:
>keep net neutrality and let the government keep control of the internet
>get rid of net neutrality and let the government-created corporate monopolies control the internet
>get rid of net neutrality and the government regulations creating regional monopolies and let the free market control the internet

Personally, with a choice between a free market solution, an oligarchy of companies and the government, i choose this.
Free market>Corporate oligarchy>government monopoly

>>133395204
>How could you be against forced equality at the hands of the government
>Sweden

What are you doing on 4chan?
You're late for your daily raping by muslims,

File: xStalins-Willing-Executioners.jpg.pagespeed.ic.iUtdRpnWrM.jpg (155KB, 602x356px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 602x356px

>>133394913
I can fucking smell your commie bullshit

>>133395300
Not surprised the Nazi is also a fucking retard.

The net is open because the USA is by far, the largest market. Our stance on NN keeps the internet open and free for everyone, even those in other nations.

You support the (((Telecoms))) probably because you're some filthy kike with comcast stock. Go fuck yourself.

I have seen 0 arguments for or against net neutrality this entire thread.

>>133395057
What the faggot said

>>133389018
You wouldn't pay for access to a network with neutral sites on it?

If you wouldn't prefer an alternative service with less regulation, this shit was inevitable anyway.

>muh evil big cumporations
>writes on his macbook while drinking starbucks™ soy double sweetened latte maccuchino

>>133395566
Kill yourself, retard
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_censorship_in_Germany

>An example of content censored by law is the removal of web sites from Google search results that deny the holocaust, which is a felony under German law

File: DODO DODO INTERNET THAT FLIES NINE NINTY PER MONTH CONNECT YOURSELF WITH DODO.png (31KB, 300x135px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 300x135px

>>133395298
>Ancient meme is still true because I say so
>literal joke ISPs provide these speeds

>>133395437
lol ok
jesus
as long as we have morons like this fighting for what decision to make, we will continue to lose more and more

>>133388866
>the internet is ours
No it isn't. You wouldn't have the internet without companies.

Also this whole neutrality issue isn't companies vs. the people. It's giant companies (Google, Facebook) vs. other giant companies (Verizon, AT&T)

>>133395723
thats cause youre on the wrong board. go to /g/

>>133388866

So the choice is either Big Brother or Big Biz.....

I trust neither but would have to go with government in the hope that one day you guys get a good government.

>>133395718
>using nazi as an insult
>using echoes to try and fit in
Your shilling is blatant and obvious. Kill yourself immediately.

>>133395602
Pretty much anytime a person argues in favor of a "free market" solution you can be sure they are fucking dopes.

Some of us took a class past Econ 101 and understand that "free market" is just a code word for "let the monopolies get even bigger".

File: shame cube.png (100KB, 193x253px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 193x253px

>>133395843
>australians think this is good internet

>>133395718
>reddit spacing
>hates ''nazis''
>pro-Net neutrality
>hates ''nazis'', but overuses echoes for no reason trying to fit in with the ''nazis''
This is some next level shilling

>>133395602

Nice, thanks. So what are the arguments against your third choice there, just ditching the whole problem? I suppose it's all wrapped up in national security and law enforcement right, like "we can't just let them use it without being watched"?

>>133388866
>grow up and get a different picture other than Goku and a powerpuff girl
>has a cartoon drawing of """himself""" (heavily idealized)
What did he mean by this?

>>133395995
>implying Nazis aren't fucking morons who should be shot on sight.

They lost, you know that right? We won. I'm an American, I hate Nazi's like I'm supposed to. When did you decide to take the side of the fucking losers?

>>133391621
That's funny because all I see from pro NN posts is mindless rhetoric, shitty strawmans and purposeful misdirection; all indicitive of shilling.

>>133396228
Talking point straight from twitter commies.

>>133396000
Feel free to post yours and how much you pay for it.

>>133396057
You can hate kikes without being a loser Nazi faggot. I'm liberal as fuck, and I hate kikes. I'm just not so stupid as to join a group of fucking losers like the Nazi party.

Keep thinking the world fits into your little boxes. You'll grow out of it one day.

>>133396000
Mate compared to the shite we get over in Britain his internet's pretty fucking good.
Stop being a twat.

File: 1465067042481.jpg (56KB, 500x385px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 500x385px

>having net neutrality somehow means the government has total control of the internet

>>133396287
>has no arguments in support of his shitty jew idea of killing NN
>hurr ur a commie.

Even if I was a communist that doesn't make me wrong about this. You're the fucking shill, no one with a brain in their heads can use a site like 4ch and be in favor of killing the very thing that keeps it from censorship.

>>133396444
Of course you're a fucking liberal, you retarded net neutrality pushing reddit using faggot.
Knowing you faggots you probably use ''kike'' the same way you use ''nigger''
>not all blacks are niggers and some whites are niggers XDDD
>nigger is a behavior not a race haha :DD
You probably think greedy evil capitalists are ''kikes''

>>133394867
The bill was only passed last year by Obama during the elections.

>>133396510
It's par for the course really, right wing dopes will believe anything they are told.

NN is the exact oppostie, without it control of information will be handed off to the (((telecoms))) to decide what we can and cannot talk about

>>133396510

>putting the internet underTitle II and regulating as a public utility somehow doesn't actually put the internet under the thumb of those regulating bodies

hilarious

>>133389140
The net is already neutral you stupid fucking cunt, we're trying to keep it that way
>>>/leddit/

>>133396207
I'm glad someone finally pointed out the hypocrisy

>>133389018
this is the argument my brother gave to me. He said without net neutrality that the companies could block whatever they wanted and make you pay more for premium.

he also tried to convince me that there was no inherent difference in the races, there's nothing wrong with having mixed kids, and white genocide isn't real.

>>133396838
The bill was passed last year by Obama during the elections.

>>133396703
You know two things Cletus, jack and shit, and jack just left town.

As I said, you will grow out of this phase you're in. Until then keep fighting the strawmen who haunt your imagination. Fucking loser.

>>133388866

>the internet is ours!

We are fully reliant on corporations to keep the network running though

>>133396643
Yes, the people who benefit the most from 4chan and free speech are the ones who are the threat to 4chan, not the people who hate 4chan and want it shut down who support net neutrality.
Makes perfect sense.

Trump just hates 4chan and free speech, that is why he is retweeting 4chan memes.
Hillary loves 4chan, so she supports net neutrality so 4chan can help her get elected in 2020.
>this is what insane liberals actually believe

>>133396838

only since last year, yet somehow the hackers known as 4chan lasted well over a decade before

>>133395531
Bots were used by Hillary. Fact.
I'm telling you why no one believes you now. Fact.
>Expects me to believe bots were used to spam comments at the FCC
Meet me half way then. Consider Hillary used bots to spam propaganda all over social media and I'll consider there are bots spamming the FCC.

>>133397000
Nice reddit wit, you sub-human faggot.

>>133396834
Then where is the regulation?
The only thing being regulated is illegal stuff like CP or drug markets, is there a problem with that? You ancap retard
I would understand if they were undermining free speech but that is not the case, so tell me, what is so wrong about not giving american ISPs total control of the internet

>>133396444
>hate kikes
>support homo- and trans-sexual propoganda
>????????

>>133397002
And they are reliant on our subscription dollars to stay in business. It's a free exchange, now they want to give the (((telecoms))) more leverage, how do you think that will work out for the typical consumer? Spoiler: you will get fucking price gouged for an inferior service.

>>133396228
>like I'm supposed to
At least you admit to being a mindless fucking subhuman.

>>133395723
Please see
>>133395602
The arguments for net neutrality will usually be blatantly marxist (informed) or will be reddit tier propaganda. The arguments against will either be anti-obama reactionary propaganda, blatantly free market, or blatantly anti-government control.

So why am i against net neutrality? Because it is a false solution to a problem the government created. We wouldn't have these few enormous companies that create regional monopolies (even in major metropolitan areas like LA or NY, theres only 2-3 choices for ISP while everywhere else often has only 1) if the government hadn't created a mountain of regulations. Now that those large corporations are taking advantage of the monopoly they were given by the government, the government wants to solve it by further regulation. Of course this begins pushing towards an ultimate monopoly of ISPs, the government. If you honestly believe that government control of the internet is a good thing, i respect that. You are a marxist/statist though.

File: deathoftheinternet.png (472KB, 2500x5562px) Image search: [Google]

472KB, 2500x5562px

>>133397101
>Meet me half way then. Consider Hillary used bots to spam propaganda

Yeah sure, probably

>>133397092
The internet is a different place now

File: 1498363095600.jpg (141KB, 614x1024px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 614x1024px

>>133396228
>like I'm supposed to

>>133388866
what is net neutrality and why should I support it?

>>133390522
You clearly don't understand what net neutrality is. Net neutrality is what we already have. No one gets their traffic artificially damaged by bullshit cable tv-style packages shilled by ISPs. Opposing net neutrality means you want to give ISPs (and the government) the power to throttle connections and demand more money. Opposing net neutrality means you're in favor of the internet equivalent of toll booths.

>hurr I want to pay ISPs more than they're already gouging me for so I can have basic internet access

Fuck off shariablue/jidf, /pol/ already settled the net neutrality debate years ago.

>>133388866
>I can't make my own opinions so I'm just going to support everything that liberals hate
If you don't support net neutrality you are an absolute retard.

>>133397148
I can tell that calling you nazi fucks out on being the degenerate loser trash that you are got under your skin.

Truth hurts I guess? Maybe you should look inward for your self-worth, rather than rely on the approval of your social group.

File: uuuhhh.png (72KB, 1074x58px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 1074x58px

>>133388866
You OP are just confused, libs aren't the ones complaining.

>>133396135
There aren't any arguments beyond "have you taken a class beyond econ 101, govt control is the only way."
>>133395996
The reason it isn't argued against is because it would mean a rollback of even more government regulation that the one in question. In other words, thinking past the current crisis to an actual solution.

>>133397380
It's the thing stopping american ISP companies regulating the bandwidth websites have among other things
If there was no NN, nothing would stop them from demanding money for faster download rates for example

Why not just call it net equality since libshits love equality so much?
ALL PACKETS MATTER

>>133397326
Thanks. That's all I wanted.

>/pol/ hates money grubbing Jews, but loves money grubbing corporations owned by Jews

>>133397187
I'm in favor of freedom, it's not the job of anyone to tell freaks how to live their lives, within reason of course.

Those wedge issues that you allow yourselves to be brainwashed by do not concern me in the least. I'm enlightened by the fact that it is matters of power and money where (((they))) need to be fought. Social issues are for soccer moms and baby boomer old farts.

>>133397516
I couldn't give less of a shit what some sub-human reddit spacing faggot who says shit like ''You know two things Cletus, jack and shit, and jack just left town'' trying to use some weird cringy word-play on figures of speech that no one uses. I don't consider you human.
People don't talk like this.

Why i 4chan being so contrarian on this issue?
Why do you want isp's to be able to fuck your ass

>>133397737
Hey faggot, this >>133397269 is all I needed to see you for what you really are.

File: 1478677802981.png (75KB, 1229x417px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 1229x417px

>>133397787
4chan has changed

>>133397269
I'm an American, we are the winners. The Nazis were the losers. They lost. You can go wave the loser flag around if you want, just know you sound like a fucking New York Nets fan, biggest losers in the league crying about the winners beating their asses.

File: 1472143835608.jpg (89KB, 499x562px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 499x562px

Americans truly are shills for their corporate masters.

Fucking retarded nation.

>>133396282
If they did anything beyond that, they would have to actually defend their position, which is government control of the internet. Best Korea, China, and Iran are then poster children.

>>133397735

Kek, I've thought this before

>fucking lefties whining about 'muh greed'
>fucking kikes shafting the world out of greed

I swear half the 'activists' in the world would get on fine if they agreed on a word between 'jew' and 'capitalist'

Does anyone else not know where they stand on NN? I feel like I'm getting jewed on every side. ISPs are against it, but all the other mega corps like Google, Amazon, Netflix, etc are for it, along with all their propagandists like Jon Oliver. Really seems like nothing more than a Jewish power struggle so I guess I'm against it just because I like less government regulation.

File: 1485455653794.jpg (4KB, 125x119px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 125x119px

>>133393622
was that why the internet was so insane around 2000-2004?

>>133397782
More tears, keep up the phoney tough guy talk. I'm laughing my ass off for real.

>Wahh this subhuman hurt my feels

>>133397880
The vast majority of people on /pol/ support net neutrality now, retard.
The faggots with their Kekistan flags and reddit spacing are the ones who support net neutrality.
The old AnCap/NatSoc /pol/ would never support net neutrality. Just because something has a neutral sounding name doesn't mean you should support it.

>>133397185

Nothing much has happened because only was established less than a year ago, and we're just about to remove those FCC power. That doesn't mean the government wouldn't do absolutely everything in their ability to control the internet in whatever way they need to. It's amazingly naive to think otherwise.

>>133394005
>We've always had a pay for quality model.
this is how it should be
emergency services and phone calls > king of thrones on netflix

>>133391576
>>>/leftypol/

>>133389688
>WE NEED THE GOVERNMENT TO TAKE OVER THE INTERNET
That's the opposite of net neutrality you fucking moron.

>>133388866
I'm going to be laughing so hard at you chucklefucks when this shit passes and every ISP on earth bans 4chan for hate speech.

But that's alright because "muh liberal tears" and "daddy Trump supports it so I do too!". You guys are pathetic. Keep sucking Comcast's dick you retards.

File: oy vey.gif (15KB, 200x225px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 200x225px

>>133388866
> Corporations are the good guys
> The Trump-owned government is the bad guy

>>133398104
You are wrong. 4chan was also mainly against SOPA. The people posting here have changed

>>133398222
And when Trump isn't in power and we get another Obama?

>>133398028
NN is basically this

If you started up a alternative to Youtube with no NN then Google could just pay to limit connections to your server under NN this cannot happen.

With NN out the window you are effectively destroying small business on the internet.

>>133398028
>guess I'm against it just because I like less government regulation.

Exactly.
At the core of the argument, it's forced equality at the hands of the government. Throughout history you can see how that has been abused and it never ends up well.

>>133398200
The opposite of net neutrality is the government taking over the internet?
More regulations and more government involvement leads to less government and less involvement?
Got to love this newspeak.
War is peace.
Freedom is slavery.
Ignorance is strength.
Listen and believe.

File: 1499804339655.jpg (110KB, 1097x802px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 1097x802px

cuz they live a parasite life

justice would be them starving until they work productively

File: really tilts my almonds.jpg (90KB, 499x525px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 499x525px

>>133398117
But why are corporations better, what makes you think they will make of the internet a better place?
Is the status quo right now not good enough for you?
American ISPs are clearly fucked up in their ethics, so why would anyone want to give them more power, this is mindboggling to me
>>133398028
And I wonder who would be more damaged in the end, the website that is basically on life support right now or the multimillionaire companies

>>133398317
No shit /pol/ was against SOPA, you absolute retard.
What in the fuck is your problem? This is the point. Old /pol/ opposed SOPA, the new reddit infested /pol/ loves net neutrality and would probably support SOPA too if it didn't have history of being opposed by 4chan.
We don't want government to police the internet, period.

>>133398207
offshore banks never block off shady customers as long as they are customers.

File: 1499696774553.gif (773KB, 260x221px) Image search: [Google]

773KB, 260x221px

The fact people are marketing their protest of the removal of this bill as if it will change the internet for the worse as if the bill has always been in place shows that the right thing to do is remove the bill.

It's purposefully misleading to do so as it is a bill that was only recently put in place not even a full year ago. The side that is in the right does not need to mislead, lie, or cheat. It is the tactics of those who are wrong and know it.

>>133398317
>Being against the government control of the internet through cracking down on internet piracy
>Being against governmental control of the internet through enforcing equality of service

In what way exactly are they contradictory?

>>133398222
>ISPs have power
>Don't like it? Choose a different ISP

>Government has the power
>Don't like it? Too bad you fucking retard it's in the legislation. Watch what you say because the government knows exactly what you're saying online. Don't expect the next administration to change anything.

>>133398652
so you want Comcast and AT&T to police the internet?

Are you a fucking idiot by any chance? You must be being paid to be this stupid.

>>133398789
> choose a different ISP
> America

Most of america has access to one ISP and one ISP only.

>>133398652
>SOPA AND PIPA are the same as NN
What the fuck is this fucking logic, I bet you are for the TPP too then

>>133398317
You need to go back to /b/

So we have two choices here. We can either have the current internet, the one that's free and open to all, and everyone who gets on the internet gets access to the whole internet. That's net neutrality.

Or, we can say fuck that, overturn net neutrality, and allow ISPs like Comcast to determine what we can and cannot see. Your Jewish masters in charge of the major media and telecom companies? Yeah, they'll decide what websites are and aren't appropriate for you the consumer.

Apparently we have to let Jewish owned corporations rape us in the ass and censor the internet to fit their agenda because not letting them do that is "MUH GUMMINT REGULASHUNS!!!"

>>133398797
Why the fuck would Comcast care what you post on 4chan, you retarded faggot, and what do you think would happen with their business if they started fucking with their customers?
You're a fucking idiot. Kill yourself.
Enjoy getting fucked in the ass by Theresa May while fantasizing about net neutrality. Maybe you can suggest her to pass a net neutrality bill, I am sure she would love it.

>>133398898
Maybe the ISP killing regulations like this are contributing towards a state ISP

>>133398644

because
>>133398789
even with the power disparity near monopoly big ISPs have, you stand a better chance against them, than the absolute monopoly of the US federal government.

>>133398898
Please read
>>133395602
The solution isnt the monopoly of government, its the removal of net neutrality AND the regulations creating corporate monopolies

>>133398766
>>133398766

>>133399063
>>133399063
Shut the fuck up

File: 5461961.png (23KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 400x400px

You need to reevaluate your beliefs if you support the destruction of net-neutrality.

It will only hurt you and everyone you know.

If that's not something to fight against then you need to question why you support the things you do.

File: comcast_ceo.png (55KB, 632x311px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 632x311px

>>133399116
>Why the fuck would Comcast care what you post on 4chan, you retarded faggot

Yeah, why would the Jewish media-mogul that runs Comcast care what the goyim are posting on their far-right imageboards? We can trust him not to push any kind of a political agenda, right?

He seems really trustworthy, right???

File: 1423338877460.jpg (6KB, 294x200px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 294x200px

>>133399117
> ISP killing regulations like this
Now I know you are an absolute idiot

>>133399116
the UK has net neutrality.

>>133398766

this, the shitty arguments and purposeful misdirection is incredibly indicitive that NN is being push by special interests that are not honest with their stated intent.

>>133399063
Net neutrality wasnt put into effect until February 26, 2015. Was 4chan banned before that date? You need to actually research the issue, not just spout bullshit reddit talking points.

>>133399185
I understand this but as >>133399251
says we need more than just removing NN, we need both and as it is, removing NN without dismantling the monopolies would just fucking destroy the internet as it is right now, what are you going to do without being able to talk about this stuff this freely?
Is the death of 4chan worth the incredibly small chance that the monopolies will get somehow dismantled ?

>>133399423
Hello Shareblue.

>>133399423
Empty rhetoric, zero arguments, emotional appeal, generic meme to try to fit in.
Best goy.

>>133399423
How?
Cut the bullshit talking points and actually give an argument for your side.

>>133388866
sage

>>133388866
Do we have some template for this congress thing?

I'm not an americuck, but would like to do something

File: LHP-ReptilianJEW2.png (291KB, 499x583px) Image search: [Google]

291KB, 499x583px

>>133389018
ITT SHILLS USING ADVANCE SOCIAL ENGINEERING and MEMETIC WARFARE to label anyone opposed to (((BIG CORPORATIONS))) CONTROL OVER THE INTERNET as THE COMMUNIST

BEWARE

File: Don_aec10f_5997424.jpg (21KB, 900x474px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 900x474px

>>133397735
>>133397976
I'm actually a libertarian but you can still spout your commie crap.

>>133399462

and people there also get arrested for speaking out against immigration on Twitter, is that you great example you want to use?

File: 1375160189033.gif (993KB, 312x176px) Image search: [Google]

993KB, 312x176px

>>133399734
what the fuck has NN got to do with that?

are you an idiot?

>>133399531
The monopolies were in place before February 26, 2015. Going back to the ISP monopolies would not "destroy the internet" it would go back to February 25, 2015. Was the internet destroyed before February 26, 2015?

Cut the bullshit reddit tier talking points and propose an actual argument

>>133399432
Now flip that around, you absolute retard.
Why does the far left and the biggest kikes alive want net neutrality to protect far-right imageboards?
Obama seems really trustworthy, surely he just wants to protect the site that keeps calling him a Kenyan half-kike, making fun of him and spreading proof of him being born in Kenya.

>>133388866
Net neutrality is actually detrimental for international growth as far as I'm concerned. Freedom to search intelligent databases for information helps people to grow businesses within their own infrastructures. I've not read net neutrality/ don't care to. But there are a lot of folks with 130+ IQ with basic and complex understandings of science, math, biology, chemistry, physics, etc.. that are benefiting YOU and the rest of the public by finding interesting articles on the internet for free, and then monetizing it.
Faggot.

>>133399531

break up the major Telecommunications corporations. Trump has breifly mentioned doing something to that effect.

>>133399726
of course the civil nationalist loves these things
Your buddy Soros should be able to import as many shitskins and fund as many riots as he afford, right?

File: 1499809260261.jpg (79KB, 777x656px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 777x656px

>without net neutrality, corporations will be able to charge more money for faster download speeds!

...isn't that the point? bandwidth isn't an unlimited resource.

>>133399478
exactly
>but now 4chan is full of nazis REEEE THE CORPORATIONS WILL BAN IT

>>133399617
Look them up you swine.

I'm not here to educate you. I was just stating my opinion.

>>133399432
Because 4chan didn't exist before 2015, right?
Australia doesn't have net neutrality, I'm posting here and have since 4chan.net
Socialists imposing more regulations only helps to maintain the current monopolies that exist. If anything, NN helps keep these jews in control.

>>133399534
>>133399576
Oh, I get it now.

Everyone you don't agree with is a shill.

>>133399878
>he stilll thinks Obama is the president

>>133399423
Net neutrality only counts against ISPs and still lets content proviers censor people for no reason ie google, youtube, twitter, etc

>>133392437
>Brazil does
Spreading lies in /pol/ I see.
Not only the bill that passed is weak as all shit, the government branch that regulates it is in bed with the big corps that run the show so it's was nothing but our retard government throwing their muscles due to the NSA controversy.

Finally, the bill did JACK SHIT when the corps wanted to fuck with net neutrality a year ago, it was the social media movements and backlash generated by the people going apeshit at the idea that made them post pone their shitty plans.

If you are going to talk net neutrality, don't use our shitty country as an example. ANATEL is the biggest fucked up joke in the world and you should feel bad for defending it.

>>133398151
>using VoIP for emergency calls
damn leafs

>>133399845
if you don't understand the distrust of government that is part of the discussion and how you example only fuels that then you are hopeless.

>>133399423
whether the commies or us conservatives win you useful idiots will be purged

>corporations will fuck over the internet
>governments will fuck over the internet
Those are the two sides of this issue. Neither side tells me why the other side might have a point.

>>133400036
Hillary isn't the president either, kike. She will never be the president and Warren is going to lose. Net neutrality is going away and never coming back.
Kill yourself, kike.

File: a1b5982aefc5ce2983f468db650e9390.jpg (128KB, 636x931px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 636x931px

>>133399683
>>133399947
Yea keep sucking that commie cock and back up your Anti-fa buddies.

>>133399967
>i cant argue my point
>i know, ill pretend that all the arguements out there aren't blatantly marxist
>"go look them up"
Its retards like you and your double speak that made me initially read up on net neutrality. Im now against it.

>>133399977
LUL if Australia is your example of how things without net neutrality....

Wait, do you actually think Australia doesn't have the worst, most exploitatious internet pricing schemes in the entire developed world?

>>133399462
wtf I love the government controlling the free market now

Oh boy I sure do love net neutrality (or as I like to call it; net equality). It surely promotes competition among businesses because it means that they all have to offer the same ""unfiltered"" access. It will surely lead to faster internet because it gives businesses the incentive to innovate.

Oh wait I live in New Zealand and we have access to gigabit internet here lmao

>>133399873
The internet was not the same 2 years ago as it is now, right now SJW pushing against companies on social media has proved how much it would hurt sites like this if we didn't had NN in effect right now

>>133400302
Have you heard of South Africa?

File: 1471200112983.jpg (79KB, 926x960px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 926x960px

>the americans here that are currently opposed to net neutrality will come crying to /pol/ once it passes

>>133400192
Keep dreaming of le epic final showdown you fag

>>133399462
and your crook toothed ass can get arrested for online posts....good points though

>>133400236
If a corporation screws over its customer, it potentially loses a customer
If a government screws over a citizen, a citizen gets screwed over.

File: Internet that flies.png (31KB, 300x135px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 300x135px

>>133400302
>Australia has shit internet meme from over a decade ago
$9 a month

>>133394740
Australia is a nanny state worse than my country. Fuck off.

>>133400241
My argument is that we shouldn't hand control of the internet over to the Jews, and your retort is "THAT MAKES YOU A JEW!!!!"?

How does that even make sense?

>>133400121
So you distrust the government that much that you would allow ultra fucking jews to control the internet?

You would literally turn the internet into ebay, giving companies the power to literally control the traffic.

You would be effectively destroying small business over the internet, American start ups will have to leave the country.

>>133400341
>Oh boy I sure do love net neutrality (or as I like to call it; net equality). It surely promotes competition among businesses because it means that they all have to offer the same ""unfiltered"" access. It will surely lead to faster internet because it gives businesses the incentive to innovate.

And without NN then businesses can just pay to have other businesses traffic cut who then in turn can pay to have another businesses traffic cut and it goes in roundabouts and the only people who suffer are the consumers.

American ISP's don't innovate and they sure aren't going to innovate any more if they're getting free money.

>>133400362
>Going to /pol/ without Net Neutrality
??????

>>133400266
No, faggot. I'm not going to list off pro-net-neutrality facts.

Go to Reddit if you want to see that kind of discussion.

If you looked up the "facts" and you're now against net-neutrality, then what am I supposed to do about it?

>>133400347
I cant tell if you actually believe that bullshit or not?
Do you not understand what net neutrality is? Please read:
>>133395602

Reminder that anyone who defends repealing net neutrality is a kike shill who deserves to be castrated in front of their children.

You package includes CNN, Facebook and Whatsapp. To visit other sites please upgrade to the Gold package for just 39.99. To visit 4chan and the 18+ sitesplease upgrade to the Gold+ package for 59.99


Most people won't upgrade, this will kill many smaller sites who won't ba able to make personal deals with ISPs.

>>133400542
>Australia is a nanny state
>Breaking up a telecom monopoly and opening the ISP game up to the free market

>>133400362
Net neutrality has been in place since february 26, 2015. It isnt going to be passed, it has passed.

>>133388866
You realize 4chan would be behind a paywall without net neutrality right???

>>133400236
People being worried that government might censor them is a legitimate concern because that is something that actually happens. Internet is heavily censored all over the world by governments.
People being worried about corporations fucking over customers banning sites and raising prices is not only ridiculous but nothing compared to what a government can do.

File: 1499236177334.jpg (72KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 1024x1024px

>>133399952
>bandwidth isn't an unlimited resource.

>>133400631
>your ISP suddenly gets a leftist political motive
>figures that 4chan is very anti-left
>slows your connection to 4chan to a fucking snail-speed unless you pay extra 40 dollars a month

Enjoy.

>>133400796
Right, I meant once it gets abolished.

File: IMG_2550.jpg (151KB, 800x820px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 800x820px

>>133400660
The redditor shows his face

>>133396988
Is this really the extent of american education?

The bill was passed because companies were only just starting to make a move to charge more for certain services. Until that time net neutrality was an unspoken rule amongst ISP's and service providers.

Anyone against net neutrality should be permabanned.

>>133400855
>cancel service
>change internet provider
Meanwhile with net neutrality
>government decides to censor everything they don't like
>no alternatives
>kill yourself

>>133400400
and you still havent made one actual point about net neutrality share blue

File: IMG_2564.png (90KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 225x225px

>>133400702

>>133389207
did she die?

>>133400855
>What is free market?

File: ss+(2016-08-20+at+10.21.28).jpg (135KB, 1053x663px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 1053x663px

>>133401077
>Americans
>having any choice with their internet service providers
I AM LAUGHING

>>133400985
We visited 4chan before February 26, 2015...

>>133400855
BAKE THE CAKE BIGOT

>>133401088

>i changed my flag so no one will know what country I'm from

coward

>>133400998
It must be fun to just throw out complete bullshit meme talk.

>>133401077
This.

>>133400809
Was it before February 26, 2015? No? I guess your argument is bullshit. How about thinking beyond the plebbit talking points and doing some critical thinking for yourself?

>>133400617

haha again with the doomsday rhetoric. we have had the internet doing fine before 2015 and we have a better chance of dealing with kike run corporations without NN, then just regulating them as a public utility by the kike run US government. You advocate for an increase in corportism under the guise of "Net Neutrality" even when you don't know the specifics of the law is that we have on the books now.

>>133401077
Censure of the State is better than the censure of corporations. You can protest against state, but against corporations no way. Just look at the censure in the Facebook. You can't protest it and there are no alternatives.

>>133400660
then at least start by listing some anti-net-neutrality facts you fucking retard

>>133401077
> Find out there's only one internet provider in your city

>>133400812
See Iran, Best Korea, China

>>133394005
You have no idea what net neutrality actually means.

>>133400812
But net neutrality didn't give the government the power to censor the internet. It just stated that no one is allowed to control and censor the internet, the government included.

Your argument is like opposing the 2nd amendment because it's just "government regulation". Yeah, technically, but it's a government regulation that's limiting the government's own authority. Same thing with net neutrality, it kept anyone from taking over the internet.

But hey, I'm a massive Jewish shill because I don't think control of the internet should be handed over to the 3 Jewish billionaire CEOs who own 95% of the telecoms in the US, right?

Fuck off, admit the fact that you're the one who's been brainwashed here. The Jews are salivating at the prospect of net neutrality being repealed.

>>133401125
Not a magic word

>>133388866
The only person whining here is you.
I'm not sure why you'd want to remove net neutrality, there's literally no benefit for consumers. Just seems like you're one of these edgy Ayn Rand kids.

File: AH-TurnOnTheGas.png (86KB, 480x320px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 480x320px

>>133400252
implying i'm mentally handicaped and unable to see past artificial construct of fake divide between (((oposition))) vs (((position))) and (((anti-fa))) vs (((right wing)))
implying i can't form my own opinions without falling into labeled political groups

you corporative kike shilling nerd virgins are cancers and will be dealth accordingly

>>133401261
faggot anon doesnt know where he is

>>133401311
>Don't like Facebook? Don't use it
>Don't like the government? Hope that the next administration will change anything

File: IMG_2566.png (398KB, 461x600px) Image search: [Google]

398KB, 461x600px

>>133401237
Im a burger. Still better than a leaf.
Just because you don't know the will of God doesn't mean i shouldn't Deus Vult.

>>133401368
Even if there are three, it does not matter if they are do it not for profit but for ((()))

>>133396819
As opposed to the government who would obviously never do that?

>>133401084
This isn't Reddit you nigger.

I'm not going to say "Ackchyually" and then start listing off pro-net-neutrality facts.

The facts are all out there. It'll take 5 seconds to find them. Why should I show you only a few pro-net-neutrality facts and then pretend like I'm helping you become more informed?

Read up on it and come to your own conclusion. Please.

>>133396988
>>133397092
There were net-neutrality-like rules in place before that, the poo-in-loo shill wants to get rid of everything

File: globalists unite.webm (1MB, 960x663px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 960x663px

>>133388866
>don't let the regulation put in place by globalist corporations be taken away by globalist corporations!

File: memes.png (687KB, 539x840px) Image search: [Google]

687KB, 539x840px

>>133401261
>corporate meme talk that defends net neutrality is better

>>133401015
How convenient companies were just starting to make a move as Obama was going out of office but still in long enough to do something about it, you kike.

>>133401261
I dunno you don't seem to be enjoying yourself

>>133401311
>protest company by changing service provider
>company loses money
vs
>protest government
>left wing counter-protesters attack you with bike locks calling you a fascist because you don't want the government to ban ''hate speech''
>left wing mayors tell police to stand down and/or protect the antifa black bloc as pro-free speech people get bloodied up and their cars burned

Really makes me think

>>133388866
> Let the gov. run it and it turns to shit
> Let corps. run it and it costs more but works

This is how things work.

>>133401533
Without internet neutrality you won't have any choice if the corporations decide to censor stuff. And there's no hope for the next administration, corporations are private entities.

>>133401125
Something that has never existed, cannot exist, and never will exist. Only exists in the minds of teenage libertarian neckbeards. It's like communism for leftists.

File: IMG_2549.jpg (188KB, 717x880px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 717x880px

>>133401261
You have shown yourself to be a hivemind redditor. Why waste my time posting anything to you besides memes?
>>133400660
Or did you forget this? You're a shill incapable of defending what you are shilling.

>>133401499
The 2nd Amendment isn't government regulation, nothing in the constitution is regulated by the government but by the people. The 2nd amendment guarantees itself because the intent was that the public would kill people trying to remove it. Our forefathers didn't count on the majority being manipulated into mindless fat lazy fucks.

>>133401499

no it didn't, it just puts the internet under Title II and under the thumb of the FCC

>>133401587
wow your vapid. so youll argue for 15 minutes over like half a dozen posts rather than say xyz in like 2-3 lines

no its not reddit so dont bitch when someone takes a jab and posts a meme on a fucking shit posting image board cunt

>>133401174
Between July 15 and September 15, 2014, the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) received 3.7 million comments to change the Internet to a telecommunications service, which would allow the FCC to uphold net neutrality.[84] On 26 February 2015, the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) ruled in favor of net neutrality by reclassifying broadband access as a telecommunications service and thus applying Title II (common carrier) of the Communications Act of 1934 as well as section 706 of the Telecommunications act of 1996
>which would allow the FCC to uphold net neutrality.
>uphold

>>133401077
You clearly don;t know how hierarchical topology structure of law works do you?
If the gov. wants access to an internet resource barred it will happen with or without net neutrality. This is where something handy like a VPN comes in although VPN providers also have to comply with the laws lest they also be shutdown and have their assets seized by the state.

>>133394867
just because something (NN in this case) doesn't have a name doesn't mean it didn't exist before.

>>133401755
There are three service providers in your block. All of them belong to the same (((group))). All censor the same stuff, just like FB and Youtube. They don't lose money because most people don't care and anyway there's no other choice. You can do nothing.

>>133401758
>ISP decides to censor something
>users mad
>other ISP sees opportunity
>"we dont censor like that other ISP - visit any site you like at one flat low price"

>>133401666
>the most democratizing power the world has ever known
>...said the conflict of interest participant who has helped shutter everyone into a handful of websites from millions

>>133401802
he really is a vapid cunt

>>133388866
Hold this L if you white

>>133389966
I sincerely hope you're fucking joking

>>133397972
>sign exclusivity agreement
>jewcast now has exclusive, government enforced control over the internet access of an entire city

>>133400252
reminder that it was the filthy Jew capitalists who stood side by side with the bolsheviks and allowed them to take over half of Europe

The only one who took a proper stand against them was the national socialists

Come on faggots, can non-americans help or not?

>>133402054
Woah, great argument. wtf I want government to control everything now

>>133401758
>the government can't affect the behavior of private corporations
>now support net neutrality so the government can affect the behavior of private corporations
wat?

>>133397277
it's this way because you need to pass the fucking cables you retard

You need ridiculous amount of money to pass internet cables and for the most part only old TV/telephone companies have the network in place.

>>133402230
>that flag

Seems like you do

>>133401077
Muh gubmint.
The government can do what they want with or without net neutrality, autist.

>>133402111
>*she
90% chance

>>133402059
It is not that easy to start ISP. Most users don't care. And they don't even know that it can be better. There are no new cellular networks in US despite the fact that in Europe cellular networks are much better. And there are no new facebooks despite their policy. I wonder why.

>>133401997
>wikipedia is a source of exact legal language
I cant tell if you are serious or trolling. Good job

>>133389018
you understimate the power of the jew

they will not agree, one of then WILL break the contract , offer "free" internet and rob all the other companies of their sales

>>133401542

>i'm a burger, my flag totally wouldn't be israeli you stupid goy

you'll burn one day

>>133401987
I'm trying to encourage people to read up on it themselves.

I don't believe in trying to brainwash people into believing what you believe, by showcasing a small portion of all the information available.

Go read up on it. Please.

It was the same a few years ago. The pro NN shills with the same talking points, so dishonest, same strawman and shitty arguments.